Assessing the impact of a motivational intervention to improve the working lives of maternity healthcare workers: a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of a feasibility study in Malawi.

Appreciative Inquiry Malawi Maternity care Patient satisfaction Staff working life

Journal

Pilot and feasibility studies
ISSN: 2055-5784
Titre abrégé: Pilot Feasibility Stud
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101676536

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 Jan 2021
Historique:
received: 02 01 2020
accepted: 12 01 2021
entrez: 30 1 2021
pubmed: 31 1 2021
medline: 31 1 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Globally too many mothers and babies die during childbirth; 98% of maternal deaths are avoidable. Skilled clinicians can reduce these deaths; however, there is a world-wide shortage of maternity healthcare workers. Malawi has enough to deliver 20% of its maternity care. A motivating work environment is important for healthcare worker retention. To inform a future trial, we aimed to assess the feasibility of implementing a motivational intervention (Appreciative Inquiry) to improve the working lives of maternity healthcare workers and patient satisfaction in Malawi. Three government hospitals participated over 1 year. Its effectiveness was assessed through: a monthly longitudinal survey of working life using psychometrically validated instruments (basic psychological needs, job satisfaction and work-related quality of life); a before and after questionnaire of patient satisfaction using a patient satisfaction tool validated in low-income settings with a maximum score of 80; and a qualitative template analysis encompassing ethnographic data, semi-structured interviews and focus groups with staff. The intervention was attended by all 145 eligible staff, who also participated in the longitudinal study. The general trend was an increase in the scores for each scale except for the basic psychological needs score in one site. Only one site demonstrated strong evidence for the intervention working in the work-related quality of life scales. Pre-intervention, 162 postnatal women completed the questionnaire; post-intervention, 191 postnatal women participated. Patient satisfaction rose in all three sites; referral hospital 4.41 rise (95% CI 1.89 to 6.95), district hospital 10.22 (95% CI 7.38 to 13.07) and community hospital 13.02 (95% CI 10.48 to 15.57). The qualitative data revealed that staff felt happier, that their skills (especially communication) had improved, behaviour had changed and systems had developed. We have shown that it is possible to implement Appreciative Inquiry in government facilities in Malawi, which has the potential to change the way staff work and improve patient satisfaction. The mixed methods approach revealed important findings including the importance of staff relationships. We have identified clear implementation elements that will be important to measure in a future trial such as implementation fidelity and inter-personal relationship factors.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Globally too many mothers and babies die during childbirth; 98% of maternal deaths are avoidable. Skilled clinicians can reduce these deaths; however, there is a world-wide shortage of maternity healthcare workers. Malawi has enough to deliver 20% of its maternity care. A motivating work environment is important for healthcare worker retention. To inform a future trial, we aimed to assess the feasibility of implementing a motivational intervention (Appreciative Inquiry) to improve the working lives of maternity healthcare workers and patient satisfaction in Malawi.
METHODS METHODS
Three government hospitals participated over 1 year. Its effectiveness was assessed through: a monthly longitudinal survey of working life using psychometrically validated instruments (basic psychological needs, job satisfaction and work-related quality of life); a before and after questionnaire of patient satisfaction using a patient satisfaction tool validated in low-income settings with a maximum score of 80; and a qualitative template analysis encompassing ethnographic data, semi-structured interviews and focus groups with staff.
RESULTS RESULTS
The intervention was attended by all 145 eligible staff, who also participated in the longitudinal study. The general trend was an increase in the scores for each scale except for the basic psychological needs score in one site. Only one site demonstrated strong evidence for the intervention working in the work-related quality of life scales. Pre-intervention, 162 postnatal women completed the questionnaire; post-intervention, 191 postnatal women participated. Patient satisfaction rose in all three sites; referral hospital 4.41 rise (95% CI 1.89 to 6.95), district hospital 10.22 (95% CI 7.38 to 13.07) and community hospital 13.02 (95% CI 10.48 to 15.57). The qualitative data revealed that staff felt happier, that their skills (especially communication) had improved, behaviour had changed and systems had developed.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
We have shown that it is possible to implement Appreciative Inquiry in government facilities in Malawi, which has the potential to change the way staff work and improve patient satisfaction. The mixed methods approach revealed important findings including the importance of staff relationships. We have identified clear implementation elements that will be important to measure in a future trial such as implementation fidelity and inter-personal relationship factors.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33514442
doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00774-7
pii: 10.1186/s40814-021-00774-7
pmc: PMC7844964
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

34

Références

Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Feb;4(2):e98-e108
pubmed: 26795602
Lancet. 2016 Oct 29;388(10056):2164-2175
pubmed: 27642022
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Jan;132(1):117-25
pubmed: 26653397
Evid Based Nurs. 2017 Jul;20(3):74-75
pubmed: 28615184
Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68-78
pubmed: 11392867
Qual Health Res. 2002 Mar;12(3):329-46
pubmed: 11918099
Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42
pubmed: 21513547
Reprod Health. 2012 Nov 16;9:30
pubmed: 23158672
Lancet. 2005 Sep 17-23;366(9490):1026-35
pubmed: 16168785
Lancet. 2005 Mar 5-11;365(9462):891-900
pubmed: 15752534
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Aug 17;18(1):336
pubmed: 30119654
Hum Resour Health. 2013 Aug 14;11:37
pubmed: 23945073
J Adv Nurs. 2007 Nov;60(3):325-33
pubmed: 17908128
JAMA. 2002 Oct 23-30;288(16):1987-93
pubmed: 12387650
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 30;9(1):e87378
pubmed: 24498089
Glob Health Action. 2013 Jan 24;6:19287
pubmed: 23364090
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Dec 04;8:247
pubmed: 19055827
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016 Oct 21;2:64
pubmed: 27965879
Hum Resour Health. 2019 Nov 15;17(1):85
pubmed: 31729996
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Jan 24;14:45
pubmed: 24456544
Stat Methods Med Res. 2014 Feb;23(1):42-59
pubmed: 22523185

Auteurs

Abi Merriel (A)

Institute for Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Zione Dembo (Z)

Parent and Child Health Initiative, Lilongwe, Malawi.

Julia Hussein (J)

Independent Maternal Health Consultant, Aberdeen, UK.

Michael Larkin (M)

Department of Psychology, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.

Allan Mchenga (A)

Parent and Child Health Initiative, Lilongwe, Malawi.

Aurelio Tobias (A)

Institute for Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.

Mark Lough (M)

Independent Psychotherapist and Organisational Consultant, Aberdeen, UK.

Address Malata (A)

Malawi University of Science and Technology, Thyolo, Malawi.

Charles Makwenda (C)

Parent and Child Health Initiative, Lilongwe, Malawi.

Arri Coomarasamy (A)

Institute for Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. a.coomarasamy@bham.ac.uk.

Classifications MeSH