Pseudoprogression versus true progression in glioblastoma patients: A multiapproach literature review. Part 2 - Radiological features and metric markers.
Diffusion MRI
Glioblastoma
MRS
PET tracers
Perfusion MRI
Progression
Pseudoprogression
Journal
Critical reviews in oncology/hematology
ISSN: 1879-0461
Titre abrégé: Crit Rev Oncol Hematol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8916049
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
15
06
2020
revised:
10
01
2021
accepted:
16
01
2021
pubmed:
31
1
2021
medline:
9
3
2021
entrez:
30
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
After chemoradiotherapy for glioblastoma, pseudoprogression can occur and must be distinguished from true progression to correctly manage glioblastoma treatment and follow-up. Conventional treatment response assessment is evaluated via conventional MRI (contrast-enhanced T1-weighted and T2/FLAIR), which is unreliable. The emergence of advanced MRI techniques, MR spectroscopy, and PET tracers has improved pseudoprogression diagnostic accuracy. This review presents a literature review of the different imaging techniques and potential imaging biomarkers to differentiate pseudoprogression from true progression.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33515701
pii: S1040-8428(21)00018-4
doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103230
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
103230Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.