Effects of a vibrational proprioceptive stimulation on recovery phase after maximal incremental cycle test.
global proprioceptive resonance
incremental test
recovery phase
Journal
European journal of translational myology
ISSN: 2037-7452
Titre abrégé: Eur J Transl Myol
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101576208
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 Dec 2020
31 Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
09
11
2020
accepted:
09
11
2020
entrez:
1
2
2021
pubmed:
2
2
2021
medline:
2
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Global Proprioceptive Resonance (GPR) is a recently developed approach conceived to solicit the various cutaneous mechanoreceptors, through application of mechanical multifocal vibration at low amplitude and at definite body sites, limiting the stimulation of the profound structures. This interventional study evaluated the effects of GPR on cardiorespiratory function during the post-exertional recovery period. A group of volunteers involved in Triathlon (a multisport discipline consisting of sequential swim, cycle, and run disciplines higly demanding in terms of metabolic engagment), underwent two maximal incremental exercise tests until exhaustion followed alternatively to (a) a 13 minutes section of GPR or (b) a standard low intensity exercise acute trend of the same duration. These effects of these two approaches were compared in terms of recovery of: heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) and venous lactate concentration (Lac). The physiological parameters (HR, RR, SpO2 and Lac) recorded in the pre-exertion session showed similar values between the 40 volunteers while several differences were recorded in the post-exertion phase. After 6 min of GPR recovery it was recorded a drop in RR below baseline (19.4±4.15 min-1 vs. 12.2± 0.4 min-1; p<0.001) coupled with an increase in peripheral oxygen saturation above the baseline (GPR: 99.0%±0.16% vs. 96.6%±0.77%, p<0.001). Moreover, the most striking result was the drop in lactate concentration measured after 13 min of GPR recovery: 84.5±3.5% in GPR vs 2.9±7.6% reduction in standard recovery (p<0.001). Notably no differences were recorded recovery of heart rate. GPR has promising effects on post-exercise recovery on RR, SpO2 and lactate level on young athletes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33520147
doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2020.9477
pmc: PMC7844409
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
9477Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
We confirm that we have read the Journal’s position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this report is consistent with those guidelines.
Références
Sports Med. 2013 Sep;43(9):851-63
pubmed: 23797729
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2015 Oct;55(10):1058-63
pubmed: 25920410
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003 Apr;89(2):171-6
pubmed: 12665981
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2011 Mar;31(2):139-44
pubmed: 21078065
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2009 Feb;105(3):421-8
pubmed: 19011891
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Mar;237(3):589-599
pubmed: 30604022
J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Dec;25(12):3495-500
pubmed: 22080321
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2014 Jun;54(3):271-8
pubmed: 24739289
Physiol Rev. 2006 Jan;86(1):89-154
pubmed: 16371596
Brain. 2002 Dec;125(Pt 12):2626-34
pubmed: 12429590
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2014 Sep;34(5):364-9
pubmed: 24237890
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008 Nov;104(5):903-8
pubmed: 18712407
Int J Mol Med. 2009 Oct;24(4):503-12
pubmed: 19724891
Clin Physiol. 2000 Mar;20(2):134-42
pubmed: 10735981
Br J Sports Med. 2005 Sep;39(9):585-9; discussion 589
pubmed: 16118292
Physiol Rev. 2012 Oct;92(4):1651-97
pubmed: 23073629
Med Sci Monit. 2007 Feb;13(2):CR71-6
pubmed: 17261985
Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2008 Nov;194(3):189-94
pubmed: 18462269
Br J Sports Med. 2010 Mar;44(4):284-8
pubmed: 18413339
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2015 Apr;10(3):388-95
pubmed: 25229836
Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2011;1(1):60-7
pubmed: 22254186
Int J Med Sci. 2007 May 31;4(3):159-63
pubmed: 17554399
Acta Physiol Hung. 2003;90(3):195-206
pubmed: 14594190
Int J Infect Dis. 2008 Sep;12(5):553-6
pubmed: 18511322
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2007 Jul;27(4):211-6
pubmed: 17564669