Effectiveness and Economic Viability of Johne's Disease (Paratuberculosis) Control Practices in Dairy Herds.
Johne's disease
MAP
Markov chain
control practice
economic analysis
paratuberculosis
testing and culling
vaccination
Journal
Frontiers in veterinary science
ISSN: 2297-1769
Titre abrégé: Front Vet Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101666658
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
12
10
2020
accepted:
10
12
2020
entrez:
1
2
2021
pubmed:
2
2
2021
medline:
2
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Johne's disease (JD or paratuberculosis) control programs have been established in many dairy-producing regions. However, the effectiveness (reduction of within-herd prevalence) and the relative economic impact as measured by, for example, the ratio of benefits to costs (BCR) across a comprehensive selection of regions and potential control practices require further investigation. Within a Markovian framework using region-specific economic variables, it was estimated that vaccination was the most promising type of JD control practice modeled, with dual-effect vaccines (reducing shedding and providing protective immunity) having BCRs between 1.48 and 2.13 in Canada, with a break-even period of between 6.17 and 7.61 years. Dual-effect vaccines were also estimated to yield BCRs greater than one in almost all major dairy-producing regions, with greater ratios in regions characterized by above-average farm-gate prices and annual production per cow. Testing and culling was comparably effective to a dual-effect vaccine at test sensitivities >70% but would remain economically unviable in almost all regions modeled.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33521086
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.614727
pmc: PMC7843527
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
614727Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Rasmussen, Barkema and Hall.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 May;70(5):2989-3004
pubmed: 15128561
Prev Vet Med. 2003 Jul 30;60(1):69-90
pubmed: 12900150
Prev Vet Med. 1999 Jun 11;40(3-4):179-92
pubmed: 10423773
Aust Vet J. 2016 Jul;94(7):232-9
pubmed: 27349883
J Dairy Sci. 2016 Feb;99(2):1449-1460
pubmed: 26686704
Prev Vet Med. 2002 Jul 25;54(3):225-45
pubmed: 12114011
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Oct;92(10):4929-36
pubmed: 19762809
J Dairy Sci. 2021 Mar;104(3):3123-3143
pubmed: 33455766
Can Vet J. 2008 Jun;49(6):569-76
pubmed: 18624066
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Sep;92(9):4340-6
pubmed: 19700693
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Sep;98(9):6070-84
pubmed: 26117348
Prev Vet Med. 2007 Feb 16;78(2):97-117
pubmed: 17112610
Can Vet J. 2006 Sep;47(9):874-82
pubmed: 17017652
Prev Vet Med. 2017 Mar 1;138:17-27
pubmed: 28237232
Tijdschr Diergeneeskd. 1985 Apr 15;110(8):310-9
pubmed: 4040661
Front Vet Sci. 2016 Oct 10;3:90
pubmed: 27777933
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2009 Aug;49(2):217-21
pubmed: 19486288
Rev Sci Tech. 2001 Apr;20(1):133-50
pubmed: 11288509
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2005 Dec 15;227(12):1975-81
pubmed: 16379637
BMC Vet Res. 2019 Jun 13;15(1):198
pubmed: 31196162
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Aug;98(8):5019-39
pubmed: 26074241
Prev Vet Med. 2009 Aug 1;90(3-4):223-32
pubmed: 19464741