Evidence for associations between Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure test and motor skill learning in older adults.
Cognitive aging
Physical rehabilitation
Visuospatial assessment
Journal
Acta psychologica
ISSN: 1873-6297
Titre abrégé: Acta Psychol (Amst)
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0370366
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
18
05
2020
revised:
21
12
2020
accepted:
16
01
2021
pubmed:
2
2
2021
medline:
3
3
2021
entrez:
1
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Age-related declines in motor learning may be related to poor visuospatial function. Thus, visuospatial testing could evaluate older adults' potential for motor learning, which has implications for geriatric motor rehabilitation. To this end, the purpose of this study was to identify which visuospatial test is most predictive of motor learning within older adults. Forty-five nondemented older adults completed six standardized visuospatial tests, followed by three weekly practice sessions on a functional upper-extremity motor task. Participants were re-tested 1 month later on the trained task and another untrained upper-extremity motor task to evaluate the durability and generalizability of motor learning, respectively. Principal component analysis first reduced the dimensions of the visuospatial battery to two principal components for inclusion in a mixed-effects model that assessed one-month follow-up performance as a function of baseline performance and the principal components. Of the two components, only one was related to one-month follow-up. Factor loadings and post hoc analyses suggested that of the six visuospatial tests, the Rey-Osterrieth test (visual construction and memory) was related to one-month follow-up of the trained and untrained tasks. Thus, it may be plausible that older adults' long-term motor learning capacity could be evaluated using the Rey-Osterrieth test, which would be feasible to administer prior to motor rehabilitation to indicate risk of non-responsiveness to therapy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33524606
pii: S0001-6918(21)00011-1
doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103261
pmc: PMC7920933
mid: NIHMS1668420
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
103261Subventions
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : F31 AG062057
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : K01 AG047926
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R03 AG056822
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Références
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Jun;101(6):3116-25
pubmed: 19357338
Asian J Occup Ther. 2016;11(1):19-25
pubmed: 28690399
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Oct;161:145-53
pubmed: 26398484
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2008 Nov-Dec;23(7-8):839-45
pubmed: 18849141
J Exp Psychol. 1963 Jul;66:6-11
pubmed: 13945480
Behav Brain Res. 2012 Mar 1;228(1):219-31
pubmed: 22142953
Neuroimage Clin. 2016 Apr 18;11:622-634
pubmed: 27182489
Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113
pubmed: 5146491
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020 Aug;32(8):1451-1458
pubmed: 31520336
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2020 Jul;63(4):359-361
pubmed: 31520785
Am J Hum Genet. 1999 Nov;65(5):1222-9
pubmed: 10521286
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Oct;90(10):1692-8
pubmed: 19801058
J Neurol Phys Ther. 2007 Mar;31(1):3-10
pubmed: 17419883
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2017 Feb;173:106-115
pubmed: 28039795
Exp Gerontol. 2019 Feb;116:14-19
pubmed: 30562555
Cereb Cortex. 2012 Feb;22(2):381-90
pubmed: 21666134
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005 Apr;15(2):161-7
pubmed: 15831397
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Jan;142(1):96-107
pubmed: 23261419
J Neurosci. 2007 Oct 31;27(44):11960-5
pubmed: 17978036
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Jun;134(2):206-14
pubmed: 20189547
Neuroreport. 2015 Dec 2;26(17):1077-82
pubmed: 26509549
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 01;10(12):e0143962
pubmed: 26625261
J Neurosci. 2010 Sep 1;30(35):11670-7
pubmed: 20810887
Neuroimage. 2014 Aug 1;96:158-66
pubmed: 24680712
Neurol Sci. 2002 Mar;22(6):443-7
pubmed: 11976975
Neuropsychology. 2000 Jul;14(3):415-26
pubmed: 10928745
Psychol Aging. 2012 Sep;27(3):550-9
pubmed: 22182364
J Mot Behav. 2012;44(5):313-27
pubmed: 22934682
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Nov;102(5):2744-54
pubmed: 19726728
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Jan;234(1):229-40
pubmed: 26438508
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(1):39-50
pubmed: 24805892
Biometrika. 1947;34(1-2):28-35
pubmed: 20287819
Neurosci Lett. 2018 Jan 18;664:139-143
pubmed: 29154858
Behav Brain Res. 2011 Nov 20;225(1):160-8
pubmed: 21784106
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 04;9(2):e87778
pubmed: 24505314
Gerontologist. 1970 Spring;10(1):20-30
pubmed: 5420677
Psychol Aging. 2019 Nov;34(7):954-977
pubmed: 31682146
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 May;92(5):792-8
pubmed: 21530727
J Neural Eng. 2016 Jun;13(3):036024
pubmed: 27172246
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jan;49(1):43-8
pubmed: 21029744
Psychol Aging. 2020 May;35(3):421-433
pubmed: 31613135
Biometrics. 1946 Dec;2(6):110-4
pubmed: 20287815
Microsc Res Tech. 2000 Oct 1;51(1):85-93
pubmed: 11002356
Cogn Neuropsychol. 1998 Jul 1;15(5):439-466
pubmed: 28657466
Nature. 1995 Aug 17;376(6541):587-90
pubmed: 7637806
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015 Aug;29(7):636-44
pubmed: 25416739
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013 Sep;27(7):602-12
pubmed: 23549521
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(9):851-62
pubmed: 21174250
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Sep;62:68-76
pubmed: 25062545
Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2010 Jan;38(1):3-9
pubmed: 20016293