Pyeloplasty is a safe and effective surgical approach for low functioning kidneys with ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Minimally-invasive surgery
Pediatric robotic surgery
Pyeloplasty
Ureteropelvic junction obstruction
Urologic reconstruction
Journal
Journal of pediatric urology
ISSN: 1873-4898
Titre abrégé: J Pediatr Urol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101233150
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2021
04 2021
Historique:
received:
23
09
2020
revised:
10
12
2020
accepted:
17
12
2020
pubmed:
3
2
2021
medline:
22
6
2021
entrez:
2
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Indications for treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) include symptomatic obstruction, urinary tract infections, presence of an obstructive pattern on functional renal scan and/or worsening differential renal function (DRF). This paper aims to determine the relationship between preoperative DRF and surgical outcomes after pyeloplasty. We hypothesized that low preoperative DRF is not an independent predictor of pyeloplasty failure. A retrospective chart review was performed to identify all patients undergoing pyeloplasty for UPJO between 2008 and 2019. Patients were included only if they had at least one preoperative functional scan and a minimum of one renal ultrasound post-operatively. Patients were divided into three groups based on DRF for analysis: Group 1- 0-10%, Group 2 - >10-≤20%, Group 3 - >20%. Baseline, intraoperative and postoperative characteristics, including success and complications were compared. Additional sensitivity analyses were performed comparing patients with ≤20%, and >20% function, ≤30%, and >30% function as well as an analysis of patients undergoing only minimally invasive reconstruction. Three hundred and sixty-four patients met inclusion criteria. We identified 8 patients in Group 1, 24 patients in Group 2 and 332 patients in Group 3. Mean procedure time was longest for the ≤10% function group (237.9 vs 206.4 vs 189.1; p = 0.01). We found no difference in 30-day post-operative complications, overall success rate or the need for additional procedures among the three groups. For patients in Group 1, we noted variation in the post-procedure DRF with a range of -2.8 to +47% change. In this group, none of patients with low DRF underwent nephrectomy. Multivariate logistic regression did not identify renal function as a predictor of operative success OR 1.00 (95% CI: 0.97-1.03) (p-value: 0.88). The results of the present study suggest that low DRF alone is not associated with worse outcomes and shows no difference in the failure rate. The incidence and type of complications were not increased for the lower functioning groups. The main limitation of this study would be its retrospective nature and single-institution experience. Furthermore, post-operative functional studies were not available for all patients, limiting the ability to draw conclusions on the change in DRF after surgery. In a large cohort, preoperative DRF was not predictive of pyeloplasty success rate. DRF ≤10% was not associated with higher incidence of complications or failure rate. The DRF alone should not dictate the management options available for patients with UPJO.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33526368
pii: S1477-5131(20)30739-7
doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.12.018
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
233.e1-233.e7Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest None.