IOL Formula Constants: Strategies for Optimization and Defining Standards for Presenting Data.
Customized constants
Formula constant optimization
Lens power calculation formulae
Mean absolute prediction error
Non-linear optimization
Journal
Ophthalmic research
ISSN: 1423-0259
Titre abrégé: Ophthalmic Res
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 0267442
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
21
12
2020
accepted:
20
01
2021
pubmed:
3
2
2021
medline:
3
3
2022
entrez:
2
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study is to present strategies for optimization of lens power (IOLP) formula constants and to show options how to present the results adequately. A dataset of N = 1,601 preoperative biometric values, IOLP data and postoperative refraction data was split into a training set and a test set using a random sequence. Based on the training set, we calculated the formula constants for established lens calculation formulae with different methods. Based on the test set, we derived the formula prediction error (PE) as difference of the achieved refraction from the formula predicted refraction. For formulae with 1 constant, it is possible to back-calculate the individual constant for each case using formula inversion. However, this is not possible for formulae with >1 constant. In these cases, more advanced concepts such as non-linear optimization strategies are necessary to derive the formula constants. During cross-validation, measures such as the mean absolute or the root mean squared PE or the ratio of cases within mean absolute PE (MAE) limits could be used as quality measures. Different constant optimization concepts yield different results. To test the performance of optimized formula constants, a cross-validation strategy is mandatory. We recommend performance curves, where the ratio of cases within absolute PE limits is plotted against the MAE.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33530082
pii: 000514916
doi: 10.1159/000514916
pmc: PMC8743903
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1055-1067Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.
Références
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 Mar;45(3):351-354
pubmed: 30851808
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Mar;32(3):419-24
pubmed: 16631049
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990 Mar;16(2):217-25
pubmed: 2329481
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 08;11(7):e0158988
pubmed: 27391100
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019 Mar;45(3):284-292
pubmed: 30851805
Ophthalmologe. 2012 May;109(5):468-73
pubmed: 22581048
J Am Intraocul Implant Soc. 1980 Oct;6(4):370
pubmed: 7440385
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 May;40(5):764-73
pubmed: 24767910
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1988 Jan;14(1):17-24
pubmed: 3339543
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990 May;16(3):333-40
pubmed: 2355321
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990 May;16(3):341-6
pubmed: 2355322
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2020 Dec;237(12):1430-1437
pubmed: 33231277
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Jan;37(1):50-62
pubmed: 21183099
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Mar;41(3):548-56
pubmed: 25708208
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2017 Aug;234(8):975-978
pubmed: 28800656
Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007 Aug;85(5):472-85
pubmed: 17403024
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017 Jun;43(6):853
pubmed: 28732622
Ophthalmic Surg. 1981 Apr;12(4):269-72
pubmed: 7254770
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Sep;35(9):1575-81
pubmed: 19683155
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993 Nov;19(6):700-12
pubmed: 8271165
Ophthalmology. 2019 Sep;126(9):1334-1335
pubmed: 30980854
Int J Ophthalmol. 2019 Jun 18;12(6):943-948
pubmed: 31236350