Comparable results using 2.0-mm vs. 3.5-mm screw augmentation in midshaft clavicle fractures: a 10-year experience.
Alignment
Clavicle
Cortical
Fracture
Osteosynthesis
Plate
Screw
Journal
European journal of medical research
ISSN: 2047-783X
Titre abrégé: Eur J Med Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9517857
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Feb 2021
02 Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
16
11
2020
accepted:
23
01
2021
entrez:
3
2
2021
pubmed:
4
2
2021
medline:
16
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Absence of cortical alignment in wedge-shaped and multifragmentary fractures (Fx) results in decreased fixation stability. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome using 2.0- vs. 3.5-mm screws for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in dislocated, wedge-shaped or fragmentary midshaft clavicle fractures. Patients suffering from AO/OTA 15 2.A-C midshaft clavicle fractures were operatively treated between 2008 and 2018. 2.0- or 3.5-mm cortical screws were used to restore anatomic alignment in dislocated, wedge-shaped and fragmentary clavicle fractures. Data of radiologic outcome were collected until fracture consolidation was identified. 80 consecutive patients with a mean age of 44.5 ± 16.3 years, who were operatively treated for dislocated midshaft clavicle fractures were enrolled. 40 patients were treated using 2.0-mm and 40 patients using routine 3.5-mm cortical screws, respectively. Time to fracture consolidation was 12.8 ± 7.8 months. No mal- or non-unions occurred during routine follow-up until 18 months postoperatively. Restoring anatomic alignment in wedge or fragmentary clavicle fractures can ultimately be addressed using cortical screw augmentation. Both groups showed comparable results with respect to fracture reduction, fixation and stability as well as time to consolidation of the fracture, while the 2.0-mm screw diameter was associated with easier handling of small Fx fragments.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33531034
doi: 10.1186/s40001-021-00487-w
pii: 10.1186/s40001-021-00487-w
pmc: PMC7851941
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
14Références
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017 Jun;137(6):749-754
pubmed: 28374093
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Jan;136(1):17-25
pubmed: 26538266
J Orthop Trauma. 2005 Aug;19(7):504-7
pubmed: 16056089
Bone Joint J. 2016 Jan;98-B(1):125-30
pubmed: 26733525
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Jul 3;95(13):1153-8
pubmed: 23824382
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Nov 2;98(21):1837-1842
pubmed: 27807117
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Nov 1;:
pubmed: 33130933
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Dec;26(12):2200-2205
pubmed: 29037534
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Jul;25(7):1195-203
pubmed: 27068381
Unfallchirurg. 2018 Dec;121(12):983-998
pubmed: 30483850
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Feb;475(2):532-539
pubmed: 27830484
Injury. 2018 Apr;49(4):753-765
pubmed: 29523350
Lancet. 2017 Feb 4;389(10068):502-503
pubmed: 28170330
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Jul;86(7):1359-65
pubmed: 15252081
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Sep;19(6):783-9
pubmed: 20713274
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998 May;80(3):476-84
pubmed: 9619941
J Hand Surg Am. 2017 Nov;42(11):875-882
pubmed: 28844775
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 Mar-Apr;18(2):204-9
pubmed: 19111476
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Mar 29;18(1):129
pubmed: 28356152
Injury. 2012 Jun;43(6):921-5
pubmed: 22405337
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997 Jul;79(4):537-9
pubmed: 9250733
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Sep 4;95(17):1576-84
pubmed: 24005198
J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Dec;29(12):533-7
pubmed: 26131565
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006 Mar-Apr;15(2):191-4
pubmed: 16517363