CT imaging of extraglottic airway device-pictorial review.
Airway management
Extraglottic airway device
Misplacement
Resuscitation
Journal
Emergency radiology
ISSN: 1438-1435
Titre abrégé: Emerg Radiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9431227
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2021
Jun 2021
Historique:
received:
19
12
2020
accepted:
21
01
2021
pubmed:
4
2
2021
medline:
26
11
2021
entrez:
3
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Compared to intubation with a cuffed endotracheal tube, extraglottic airway devices (EGDs), such as laryngeal mask airways, are considered less definitive ventilation conduit devices and are therefore often exchanged via endotracheal intubation (ETI) prior to obtaining CT images. With more widespread use and growing comfort among providers, reports have now described use of EGDs for up to 24 h including cases for which clinicians obtained CT scans with an EGD in situ. The term EGD encompasses a wide variety of devices with more complex structure and CT appearance compared to ETI. All EGDs are typically placed without direct visualization and require less training and time for insertion compared to ETI. While blind insertion generally results in functional positioning, numerous studies have reported misplacements of EGDs identified by CT in the emergency department or post-mortem. A CT-based classification system has recently been suggested to categorize these misplacements in six dimensions: depth, size, rotation, device kinking, mechanical blockage of the ventilation opening(s), and injury from EGD placement. Identifying the type of EGD and its correct placement is critically important both to provide prompt feedback to clinicians and prevent inappropriate medicolegal problems. In this review, we introduce the main types of EGDs, demonstrate their appearance on CT images, and describe examples of misplacements.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33532932
doi: 10.1007/s10140-021-01909-2
pii: 10.1007/s10140-021-01909-2
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
665-673Références
Donatelli J, Gupta A, Santhosh R, Hazelton TR, Nallamshetty L, Macias A, Rojas CA (2015) To breathe or not to breathe: a review of artificial airway placement and related complications. Emerg Radiol 22(2):171–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-014-1271-8
doi: 10.1007/s10140-014-1271-8
pubmed: 25266155
Norii T, Makino Y, Unuma K, Hatch GM, Adolphi NL, Dallo S, Albright D, Sklar DP, Braude D. (2021) Extraglottic airway device misplacement: a novel classification system and findings in postmortem computed tomography. Ann Emerg Med 15:S0196-0644(20)31266-X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.10.005
Green DB, Root CW, Drexler IR, Legasto AC, St George J (2017) The King laryngeal tube: a mimic of esophageal intubation in the emergency department. Emerg Radiol 24(6):701–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-017-1529-z
doi: 10.1007/s10140-017-1529-z
pubmed: 28634749
Driver BE, Plummer D, Heegaard W, Reardon RF (2016) Tracheal malplacement of the King LT airway may be an important cause of prehospital device failure. J Emerg Med 51(6):e133–e135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.07.006
doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.07.006
pubmed: 27650719
White JM, Braude DA, Lorenzo G, Hart BL (2015) Radiographic evaluation of carotid artery compression in patients with extraglottic airway devices in place. Acad Emerg Med 22(5):636–638. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12647
doi: 10.1111/acem.12647
pubmed: 25903385
Braude D, Steuerwald M, Wray T, Galgon R (2019) Managing the out-of-hospital extraglottic airway device. Ann Emerg Med 74(3):416–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.03.002
doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.03.002
pubmed: 31060744
Braude D, Southard A, Bajema T, Sims E, Martinez J (2010) Rapid sequence airway using the LMA-Supreme as a primary airway for 9 h in a multi-system trauma patient. Resuscitation. 81(9):1217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.06.001
doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.06.001
pubmed: 20599313
Schweitzer W, Spycher I, Winklhofer S, Thali MJ, Ruder TD, Ampanozi G, Flach PM, Ross SG (2013) Assessment of laryngeal tube placement on post mortem computed tomography scans. J Forens Radiol Imag 1(3):119–123
doi: 10.1016/j.jofri.2013.04.001
Hernandez MR, Klock PA Jr, Ovassapian A (2012) Evolution of the extraglottic airway: a review of its history, applications, and practical tips for success. Anesth Analg 114(2):349–368. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e31823b6748
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31823b6748
pubmed: 22178627
Portereiko JV, Perez MM, Hojman H, Frankel HL, Rabinovici R (2006) Acute upper airway obstruction by an over-inflated Combitube esophageal obturator balloon. J Trauma 60(2):426–427. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000203539.79009.50
doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000203539.79009.50
pubmed: 16508511
Steenburg SD, Spitzer T, Rhodes A (2019) Post-mortem computed tomography improves completeness of the trauma registry: a single institution experience. Emerg Radiol 26(1):5–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-018-1637-4
doi: 10.1007/s10140-018-1637-4
pubmed: 30159814
Cook TM, Kelly FE (2015) Time to abandon the ‘vintage’ laryngeal mask airway and adopt second-generation supraglottic airway devices as first choice. Br J Anaesth 115(4):497–499. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aev156
doi: 10.1093/bja/aev156
pubmed: 25995266
Timmermann A, Bergner UA, Russo SG (2015) Laryngeal mask airway indications: new frontiers for second-generation supraglottic airways. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 28(6):717–726. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000000262
doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000262
pubmed: 26539790
Rabitsch W, Schellongowski P, Staudinger T, Hofbauer R, Dufek V, Eder B, Raab H, Thell R, Schuster E, Frass M (2003) Comparison of a conventional tracheal airway with the Combitube in an urban emergency medical services system run by physicians. Resuscitation. 57(1):27–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-9572(02)00435-5
doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(02)00435-5
pubmed: 12668296
Van Zundert AA, Kumar CM, Van Zundert TC (2016) Malpositioning of supraglottic airway devices: preventive and corrective strategies. Br J Anaesth 116(5):579–582. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aew104
doi: 10.1093/bja/aew104
pubmed: 27106958
Vannucci A, Rossi IT, Prifti K, Kallogjeri D, Rangrass G, DeCresce D, Brenner D, Lakshman N, Helsten DL, Cavallone LF (2018) Modifiable and nonmodifiable factors associated with perioperative failure of extraglottic airway devices. Anesth Analg 126(6):1959–1967. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002659
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002659
pubmed: 29256932
Vithalani VD, Vlk S, Davis SQ, Richmond NJ (2017) Unrecognized failed airway management using a supraglottic airway device. Resuscitation. 119:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.07.019
doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.07.019
pubmed: 28750882
Driver BE, Plummer D, Heegaard W, Reardon RF (2016) Tracheal malplacement of the King LT airway may be an important cause of prehospital device failure. J Emerg Med 51(6):e133–e135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.07.006
doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.07.006
pubmed: 27650719
Nagata S, Kim SH, Mizushima Y, Norii T (2018) Airway obstruction due to sticky rice cake (mochi): a case series and review of the literature. Int J Emerg Med 11(1):34. Published 2018 Aug 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-018-0194-7
doi: 10.1186/s12245-018-0194-7
pubmed: 31179924
pmcid: 6333428
Vézina MC, Trépanier CA, Nicole PC, Lessard MR (2007) Complications associated with the Esophageal-Tracheal Combitube in the pre-hospital setting. Can J Anaesth 54(2):124–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03022008
doi: 10.1007/bf03022008
pubmed: 17272251