Dynamic PET image reconstruction utilizing intrinsic data-driven HYPR4D denoising kernel.


Journal

Medical physics
ISSN: 2473-4209
Titre abrégé: Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0425746

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2021
Historique:
revised: 16 10 2020
received: 11 05 2020
accepted: 28 01 2021
pubmed: 4 2 2021
medline: 25 5 2021
entrez: 3 2 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Reconstructed PET images are typically noisy, especially in dynamic imaging where the acquired data are divided into several short temporal frames. High noise in the reconstructed images translates to poor precision/reproducibility of image features. One important role of "denoising" is therefore to improve the precision of image features. However, typical denoising methods achieve noise reduction at the expense of accuracy. In this work, we present a novel four-dimensional (4D) denoised image reconstruction framework, which we validate using 4D simulations, experimental phantom, and clinical patient data, to achieve 4D noise reduction while preserving spatiotemporal patterns/minimizing error introduced by denoising. Our proposed 4D denoising operator/kernel is based on HighlY constrained backPRojection (HYPR), which is applied either after each update of OSEM reconstruction of dynamic 4D PET data or within the recently proposed kernelized reconstruction framework inspired by kernel methods in machine learning. Our HYPR4D kernel makes use of the spatiotemporal high frequency features extracted from a 4D composite, generated within the reconstruction, to preserve the spatiotemporal patterns and constrain the 4D noise increment of the image estimate. Results from simulations, experimental phantom, and patient data showed that the HYPR4D kernel with our proposed 4D composite outperformed other denoising methods, such as the standard OSEM with spatial filter, OSEM with 4D filter, and HYPR kernel method with the conventional 3D composite in conjunction with recently proposed High Temporal Resolution kernel (HYPRC3D-HTR), in terms of 4D noise reduction while preserving the spatiotemporal patterns or 4D resolution within the 4D image estimate. Consequently, the error in outcome measures obtained from the HYPR4D method was less dependent on the region size, contrast, and uniformity/functional patterns within the target structures compared to the other methods. For outcome measures that depend on spatiotemporal tracer uptake patterns such as the nondisplaceable Binding Potential (BP As compared to conventional methods, our proposed HYPR4D method can produce more robust and accurate image features without requiring any prior information.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33533050
doi: 10.1002/mp.14751
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2230-2244

Subventions

Organisme : Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
ID : 240670-13

Informations de copyright

© 2021 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Références

Politis M, Piccini P. Positron emission tomography imaging in neurological disorders. J Neurol. 2012;259:1769-1780.
Bomanji J, Costa DC, Ell P. Clinical role of positron emission tomography in oncology. Lancet Oncol. 2001;2:157-164.
Keng F. Clinical applications of positron emission tomography in cardiology: a review. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2004;33:175-182.
Cheng J-C, Matthews J, Sossi V, Anton-Rodriguez J, Salomon A, Boellaard R. Incorporating HYPR de-noising within iterative PET reconstruction (HYPR-OSEM). Phys Med Biol. 2017;62:6666-6687.
Bland J, Mehranian A, Belzunce MA, et al. MR-guided kernel EM reconstruction for reduced dose PET imaging. IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci. 2018;2:235-243.
Johnson KM, Velikina J, Wu Y, Kecskemeti S, Wieben O, Mistretta CA. Improved waveform fidelity using local HYPR reconstruction (HYPR LR). Magn Reson Med. 2008;59:456-462.
Christian BT, Vandehey NT, Floberg JM, Mistretta CA. Dynamic PET denoising with HYPR processing. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:1147-1154.
Hudson HM, Larkin RS. Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1994;13:601-609.
Wang G, Qi J. PET image reconstruction using kernel method. IEEE Trans Med Imag. 2015;34:61-71.
Floberg JM, Mistretta CA, Weichert JP, Hall LT, Holden JE, Christian BT. Improved kinetic analysis of dynamic PET data with optimized HYPR-LR. Med Phys. 2012;39:3319-3331.
Wang G. High temporal-resolution dynamic PET image reconstruction using a new spatiotemporal kernel method. IEEE TMI. 2019;38:664-674.
Rahmim A, Tang J, Zaidi H. Four-dimensional (4D) image reconstruction strategies in dynamic PET: beyond conventional independent frame reconstruction. Med Phys. 2009;36:3654-3670.
Reader AJ, Verhaeghe J. 4D image reconstruction for emission tomography. Phys Med Biol. 2014;59:R371.
Wang S, Kim S, Cosgrove KP, Morris ED. A framework for designing dynamic lp-ntPET studies to maximize the sensitivity to transient neurotransmitter responses to drugs: application to dopamine and smoking. NeuroImage. 2017;146:701-714.
De Jong HW, van Velden FH, Kloet RW, Buijs FL, Boellaard R, Lammertsma AA. Performance evaluation of the ECAT HRRT: an LSO-LYSO double layer high resolution, high sensitivity scanner. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52:1505-1526.
Spencer B, Qi J, Badawi RD, Wang G.Dynamic PET Image reconstruction for parametric imaging using the HYPR kernel method, Proc. SPIE Med. Imag., 2017.
Lu L, Karakatsanis NA, Tang J, Chen W, Rahmim A. 3.5D dynamic PET image reconstruction incorporating kinetics-based clusters. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57:5035-5055.
Wu Y, Carson R. Noise reduction in the simplified reference tissue model for neuroreceptor functional imaging. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2002;22:1440-1452.
Wang Z, Bovik A, Sheikh H, Simoncelli E. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2004;13(4):600-612.
Klyuzhin IS, Cheng J-C, Bevington C, Sossi V. Use of a Tracer-specific Deep Artificial Neural Net to Denoise Dynamic PET Images, IEEE TMI, p. early access, 2019.

Auteurs

Ju-Chieh Kevin Cheng (JK)

Pacific Parkinson's Research Centre, The University of British Columbia, 2215 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.
Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of British Columbia, 6224 Agricultural Road, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z1, Canada.

Connor Bevington (C)

Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of British Columbia, 6224 Agricultural Road, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z1, Canada.

Arman Rahmim (A)

Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of British Columbia, 6224 Agricultural Road, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z1, Canada.
Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.

Ivan Klyuzhin (I)

Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 2B5, Canada.

Julian Matthews (J)

Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, Wolfson Molecular Imaging Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M20 3LJ, UK.

Ronald Boellaard (R)

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, Netherlands.
Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 KC, Groningen, Netherlands.

Vesna Sossi (V)

Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of British Columbia, 6224 Agricultural Road, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z1, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH