Neoadjuvant therapy of BRCA1-driven ovarian cancer by combination of cisplatin, mitomycin C and doxorubicin.
BRCA1
Cisplatin
Doxorubicin
Mitomycin C
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Ovarian cancer
Journal
Hereditary cancer in clinical practice
ISSN: 1731-2302
Titre abrégé: Hered Cancer Clin Pract
Pays: Poland
ID NLM: 101231179
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Feb 2021
03 Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
15
01
2021
accepted:
27
01
2021
entrez:
4
2
2021
pubmed:
5
2
2021
medline:
5
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cisplatin, mitomycin C and anthracyclines demonstrate high activity in BRCA1-deficient tumors. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the triplet combination of these drugs in BRCA1-driven high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSOCs). Ten HGSOC patients with germ-line BRCA1 mutation received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) consisting of mitomycin C 10 mg/m None of the patients treated by the MAP scheme demonstrated complete pathologic response in ovaries, while 4 women showed absence of tumor cells in surgically excised omental specimens. When chemotherapy response scores (CRS) were considered, poor responsiveness (CRS 1) was not observed in the MAP group, but was common for the TCbP regimen (6/16 (38 %) for ovaries and 5/16 (31 %) for omentum; p = 0.05 and 0.12, respectively). Median treatment-free interval (TFI) was not reached in women treated by the MAP, but was 9.5 months for the TCbP scheme (p = 0.1). The rate of the recurrence within 1 year after the completion of the treatment was 4/10 (40 %) for the MAP and 10/13 (77 %) for the TCbP (p = 0.1). The attempt to intensify NACT by administering combination of 3 drugs did not result in high rate of complete pathologic responses. However, there was a trend towards higher efficacy of the MAP regimen versus conventional TCbP scheme with regard to CRS and clinical outcomes.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Cisplatin, mitomycin C and anthracyclines demonstrate high activity in BRCA1-deficient tumors. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the triplet combination of these drugs in BRCA1-driven high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSOCs).
METHODS
METHODS
Ten HGSOC patients with germ-line BRCA1 mutation received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) consisting of mitomycin C 10 mg/m
RESULTS
RESULTS
None of the patients treated by the MAP scheme demonstrated complete pathologic response in ovaries, while 4 women showed absence of tumor cells in surgically excised omental specimens. When chemotherapy response scores (CRS) were considered, poor responsiveness (CRS 1) was not observed in the MAP group, but was common for the TCbP regimen (6/16 (38 %) for ovaries and 5/16 (31 %) for omentum; p = 0.05 and 0.12, respectively). Median treatment-free interval (TFI) was not reached in women treated by the MAP, but was 9.5 months for the TCbP scheme (p = 0.1). The rate of the recurrence within 1 year after the completion of the treatment was 4/10 (40 %) for the MAP and 10/13 (77 %) for the TCbP (p = 0.1).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The attempt to intensify NACT by administering combination of 3 drugs did not result in high rate of complete pathologic responses. However, there was a trend towards higher efficacy of the MAP regimen versus conventional TCbP scheme with regard to CRS and clinical outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33536037
doi: 10.1186/s13053-021-00173-2
pii: 10.1186/s13053-021-00173-2
pmc: PMC7860626
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
14Subventions
Organisme : Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation
ID : 075-15-2020-789
Références
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jan 20;28(3):375-9
pubmed: 20008645
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018 Oct;28(8):1498-1506
pubmed: 30247247
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 May;29(4):779-786
pubmed: 30839285
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Sep;217(3):334.e1-334.e9
pubmed: 28549976
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Nov;184(1):229-235
pubmed: 32776218
Int J Cancer. 2020 Apr 1;146(7):1879-1888
pubmed: 31693165
Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2016 Aug 23;14(1):17
pubmed: 27555886
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2021 Jan;157:103128
pubmed: 33137578
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Mar 23;11(3):
pubmed: 30909618
Int J Cancer. 2019 Dec 15;145(12):3311-3320
pubmed: 31173646
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424
pubmed: 30207593
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2016;35:153-62
pubmed: 27249696
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Aug 1;33(22):2457-63
pubmed: 26124480
Cancer Lett. 2015 Dec 28;369(2):363-7
pubmed: 26342406
Lancet. 2019 Mar 23;393(10177):1240-1253
pubmed: 30910306
Semin Cancer Biol. 2020 Aug 19;:
pubmed: 32827632
Cancer Lett. 2017 Jul 1;397:127-132
pubmed: 28377179
Cancer Res. 2009 Apr 15;69(8):3625-33
pubmed: 19336573