Why the Chosen Ones May Not Always Be the Best Leaders: Criteria for Captain Selection as Predictors of Leadership Quality and Acceptance.

athlete leadership captain selection leader acceptance leadership quality peer leadership team captain

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 13 10 2020
accepted: 21 12 2020
entrez: 4 2 2021
pubmed: 5 2 2021
medline: 5 2 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

There seems to be some initial evidence that team captains are selected based on non-leadership factors such as team tenure, technical abilities, being the daughter of the club president, or playing position. This is concerning since players expect their ideal team captain to have superior motivational and social skills. Adding to this literature on captain selection, the present study investigates relationships between the reasons for which team captains are selected and their (a) perceived leadership quality; and (b) perceived acceptance. To accomplish this, we recruited 450 coaches and 198 players from Flemish football and volleyball teams. Participants evaluated 41 reasons on the extent to which they played a role in the selection of their team captain. Additionally, participants rated their team captain's leadership quality and level of acceptance. The results consistently indicated that captains who were selected for having good motivational and social competencies were given higher ratings on perceived leadership quality and acceptance by participants. In conclusion, athletes who are motivated, good at motivating others and have superior social skills tend to be better suited for captaincy than those selected based on non-leadership factors.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33536982
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.616966
pmc: PMC7848118
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

616966

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Butalia, Fransen, Coffee, Laenens and Boen.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Eur J Sport Sci. 2017 Mar;17(2):215-221
pubmed: 27802785
J Sports Sci. 2014;32(14):1389-97
pubmed: 24660668
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Oct;59(10):1102-9
pubmed: 16980151
Eur J Sport Sci. 2020 Aug;20(7):953-963
pubmed: 31607229
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2020 Apr;30(4):766-786
pubmed: 31876007
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 15;11(12):e0168150
pubmed: 27977734
J Sci Med Sport. 2021 Mar;24(3):281-290
pubmed: 33060061
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2011 Oct;41(3):305-12
pubmed: 21700411
J Sci Med Sport. 2017 Aug;20(8):800-806
pubmed: 28214098
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 04;10:2212
pubmed: 31636581
J Sports Sci. 2016 Nov;34(21):2063-73
pubmed: 26902840
Curr Opin Psychol. 2016 Apr;8:64-69
pubmed: 29506806

Auteurs

Radhika Butalia (R)

Department of Movement Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Katrien Fransen (K)

Department of Movement Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Pete Coffee (P)

Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom.

Jolien Laenens (J)

Department of Movement Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Filip Boen (F)

Department of Movement Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Classifications MeSH