Long-term effectiveness of an online decision aid for female cancer patients regarding fertility preservation: Knowledge, attitude, and decisional regret.


Journal

Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica
ISSN: 1600-0412
Titre abrégé: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370343

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2021
Historique:
revised: 14 01 2021
received: 31 10 2020
accepted: 30 01 2021
pubmed: 5 2 2021
medline: 29 6 2021
entrez: 4 2 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The decision, whether to undergo fertility preservation or not is highly demanding for cancer patients. Decision aids may act as an additional source of support. So far, only a limited number of decision aids regarding fertility preservation for female cancer patients exist and have been evaluated systematically. This paper presents the results of secondary analyses of the first randomized controlled trial evaluating an online decision aid for female cancer patients affected by different types of cancer. It focuses on fertility-related knowledge, attitude toward fertility preservation, and long-term effectiveness regarding decisional regret. Young female cancer patients between 18 and 40 years of age were recruited after fertility counseling with a reproductive specialist. They were assigned to either the control group (counseling only) or the intervention group (counseling followed by the additional use of the decision aid). Both groups had to complete a questionnaire after counseling as well as 1 and 12 months later, covering topics such as fertility-related knowledge, attitude towards fertility preservation, decisional conflict and regret. Recruitment was ongoing during 18 months in eight fertility centers located in Switzerland and Germany. Mean age of participating women was 29.31 years (SD 4.57). Of the entire sample (n = 51) 53% were affected with breast cancer, 27.4% with lymphoma, and 19.6% with various other types of cancer. Knowledge regarding the most common fertility preservation methods was high and comparable in both groups. Positive attitude significantly exceeded negative attitude among all participants (p = 0.001). Although the altogether low scores for decisional regret were on a higher level in the control group (T2: mean = 19.00, SD = 13.24; T3: mean = 22.0, SD = 20.67) than in the intervention group (T2: mean = 14.12, SD = 11.07; T3: mean = 12.94, SD = 13.24), there were no statistically significant differences between and within both groups. There was a positive association between decisional conflict and decisional regret at T3 (p = 0.001, r = 0.510). This decision aid was suitable as an additional source of knowledge and may positively impact decisional regret in the long term. Results suggest that the provision of an online decision aid as a complement to fertility counseling may facilitate decision-making.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33538329
doi: 10.1111/aogs.14108
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1132-1139

Informations de copyright

© 2021 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG). Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Anazodo A, Laws P, Logan S, et al. How can we improve oncofertility care for patients? A systematic scoping review of current international practice and models of care. Human Reprod Update. 2018;25:159-179.
Treves R, Grynberg M, Parco S, Finet A, Poulain M, Fanchin R. Female fertility preservation in cancer patients: an instrumental tool for the envisioning a postdisease life. Future Oncol. 2014;10:969-974.
Oktay K, Harvey BE, Partridge AH, et al. Fertility preservation in patients with cancer: ASCO clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:1994-2001.
Peccatori FA, Azim HA, Orecchia R, et al. Cancer, pregnancy and fertility: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(suppl 6):vi160-vi170.
Lambertini M, Del Mastro L, Pescio MC, et al. Cancer and fertility preservation: international recommendations from an expert meeting. BMC Med. 2016;14:1.
Klock SC, Zhang JX, Kazer RR. Fertility preservation for female cancer patients: early clinical experience. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:149-155.
Urech C, Ehrbar V, Boivin J, et al. Knowledge about and attitude towards fertility preservation in young female cancer patients: a cross-sectional online survey. Hum Fertil. 2018;21:45-51.
Deshpande NA, Braun IM, Meyer FL. Impact of fertility preservation counseling and treatment on psychological outcomes among women with cancer: a systematic review. Cancer. 2015;121:3938-3947.
Kim J, Deal AM, Balthazar U, Kondapalli LA, Gracia C, Mersereau JE. Fertility preservation consultation for women with cancer: are we helping patients make high-quality decisions? Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;27:96-103.
Brehaut JC, O'Connor AM, Wood TJ, et al. Validation of a decision regret scale. Med Decis Making. 2003;23:281-292.
Flink DM, Sheeder J, Kondapalli LA. A review of the oncology patient's challenges for utilizing fertility preservation services. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2017;6:31-44.
Stacey D, Légaré F, Lewis K, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;4:CD001431.
Speller B, Metcalfe K, Kennedy ED, et al. The "Begin Exploring Fertility Options, Risks and Expectations" (BEFORE) decision aid: development and alpha testing of a fertility tool for premenopausal breast cancer patients. BMC Med Inform Decis Making. 2019;19:203.
Garvelink MM, Ter Kuile MM, Louwe LA, Hilders C, Stiggelbout AM. Feasibility and effects of a decision aid about fertility preservation. Hum Fertil. 2017;20:104-112.
Peate M, Meiser B, Cheah BC, et al. Making hard choices easier: a prospective, multicentre study to assess the efficacy of a fertility-related decision aid in young women with early-stage breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2012;106:1053-1061.
Ehrbar V, Urech C, Rochlitz C, et al. Randomized controlled trial on the effect of an online decision aid for young female cancer patients regarding fertility preservation. Hum Reprod. 2019;34:1726-1734.
Elwyn G, O'Connor A, Stacey D, et al. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ. 2006;333:417.
Joseph-Williams N, Newcombe R, Politi M, et al. Toward minimum standards for certifying patient decision aids: a modified Delphi consensus process. Med Decis Making. 2014;34:699-710.
O'Connor AM. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making. 1995;15:25-30.
Tschudin S, Bunting L, Abraham J, Gallop-Evans E, Fiander A, Boivin J. Correlates of fertility issues in an internet survey of cancer survivors. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;31:150-157.
Müller M, Urech C, Boivin J, et al. Addressing decisional conflict about fertility preservation: helping young female cancer survivors’ family planning decisions. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2018;44:175-180.
Sobota A, Ozakinci G. Fertility and parenthood issues in young female cancer patients - a systematic review. J Cancer Surviv. 2014;8:707-721.
Vadaparampil ST, Christie J, Quinn GP, et al. A pilot study to examine patient awareness and provider discussion of the impact of cancer treatment on fertility in a registry-based sample of African American women with breast cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20:2559-2564.
Peate M, Meiser B, Friedlander M, et al. It's now or never: fertility-related knowledge, decision-making preferences, and treatment intentions in young women with breast cancer - an Australian fertility decision aid collaborative group study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1670-1677.
Chan JL, Letourneau J, Salem W, et al. Regret around fertility choices is decreased with pre-treatment counseling in gynecologic cancer patients. J Cancer Surviv. 2017;11:58-63.
Letourneau JM, Ebbel EE, Katz PP, et al. Pretreatment fertility counseling and fertility preservation improve quality of life in reproductive age women with cancer. Cancer. 2012;118:1710-1717.
Bastings L, Baysal O, Beerendonk CCM, et al. Deciding about fertility preservation after specialist counselling. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:1721-1729.
Benedict C, Thom B, Kelvin JF. Young adult female cancer survivors’ decision regret about fertility preservation. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2015;4:213-218.
Becerra Perez MM, Menear M, Brehaut JC, Legare F. Extent and predictors of decision regret about health care decisions: a systematic review. Med Decis Making. 2016;36:777-790.
Greenwood EA, Pasch LA, Hastie J, Cedars MI, Huddleston HG. To freeze or not to freeze: decision regret and satisfaction following elective oocyte cryopreservation. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(6):1097-1104.e1.
Wang Y, Anazodo A, Logan S. Systematic review of fertility preservation patient decision aids for cancer patients. Psychooncology. 2019;28:459-467.
Gray NJ, Klein JD, Noyce PR, Sesselberg TS, Cantrill JA. Health information-seeking behaviour in adolescence: the place of the internet. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60:1467-1478.

Auteurs

Verena Ehrbar (V)

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Ariane Germeyer (A)

Department of Gynecological Endocrinology and Fertility Disorders, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Frank Nawroth (F)

Center for Infertility, Prenatal Medicine, Endocrinology and Osteology, amedes experts, Hamburg, Germany.

Astrid Dangel (A)

Center for Infertility, Prenatal Medicine, Endocrinology and Osteology, amedes experts, Hamburg, Germany.

Sebastian Findeklee (S)

Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg, Germany.

Corinne Urech (C)

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Christoph Rochlitz (C)

Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Ruth Stiller (R)

Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Sibil Tschudin (S)

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH