Quantification of the Therapist's Gentle Pull for Pinch Strength Testing Based on FMA and MMT: An Experimental Study with Healthy Subjects.
4/5 MMT
FMA
gentle pull
pinch strength
quantitative value
stroke
Journal
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-4418
Titre abrégé: Diagnostics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101658402
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Feb 2021
02 Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
29
10
2020
revised:
03
12
2020
accepted:
04
12
2020
entrez:
5
2
2021
pubmed:
6
2
2021
medline:
6
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Static pinch strength against a therapist's gentle pull is evaluated using the pincer grasp component of the Fugl Meyer Assessment (FMA) to assess pinch impairment after stroke. In the pincer grasp component, therapists applied a gentle pull to distinguish between a score of 1 (moderate pinch impairment) and a score of 2 (no pinch impairment). The gentle pull is described as a resistance equivalent to a manual muscle test (MMT) score 4/5. The accepted use of "gentle" as a qualitative description for the pull results is a non-standardized subjective interpretation. The goal of this paper was to determine the quantitative value of the gentle pull applied by the therapists as in their clinical practice using a pinch-pull gripping system. The FMA protocol was used to standardize the body and fingers positions of three occupational therapists who were then instructed to apply a gentle pull of 4/5 MMT using their thumb and index fingers (in a tip-to-tip pinch). The results show that the therapists exerted a mean gentle pull (4/5 MMT score) of 6.34 ± 0.98 N with high reliability and acceptable repeatability. In investigating the ability of healthy subjects to resist the gentle pull, 50 adult male volunteers were instructed to pinch the pincer object and resist a dynamic loading exerted by the pinch-pull gripping system as much as possible to the moment the pincer object slips away. The results show that all subjects were able to exert a pulling force higher than the quantitative value of the gentle pull.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33540890
pii: diagnostics11020225
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11020225
pmc: PMC7913180
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Universiti Putra Malaysia
ID : IPS No. 9574400
Références
Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Aug 18;66(3):316-328
pubmed: 33089088
Appl Ergon. 2019 Sep;79:9-16
pubmed: 31109465
J Sport Rehabil. 2014 Feb;23(1):56-64
pubmed: 24231811
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2018 Jan;26(1):125-134
pubmed: 28952944
Int J Rehabil Res. 2010 Mar;33(1):4-11
pubmed: 19238089
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Mar;98(3):456-462
pubmed: 27519928
Sensors (Basel). 2015 Aug 14;15(8):20097-114
pubmed: 26287206
Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl. 1980;7:85-93
pubmed: 6932734
Stroke. 2011 Feb;42(2):427-32
pubmed: 21164120
Chiropr Osteopat. 2008 Dec 19;16:16
pubmed: 19099575
Work. 2018;60(3):465-473
pubmed: 30040785
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 29;13(3):e0194531
pubmed: 29596450
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013 Oct;27(8):732-41
pubmed: 23774125
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Dec;93(12):2373-6.e5
pubmed: 22759831
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Sep;237(9):2167-2184
pubmed: 31209510
J R Soc Interface. 2012 Dec 19;10(80):20120467
pubmed: 23256185
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:925217
pubmed: 26176015
Can J Neurol Sci. 2018 Sep;45(5):518-521
pubmed: 30071911