No evidence that selection for egg production persistency causes loss of bone quality in laying hens.
Journal
Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE
ISSN: 1297-9686
Titre abrégé: Genet Sel Evol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 9114088
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Feb 2021
04 Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
16
07
2020
accepted:
13
01
2021
entrez:
5
2
2021
pubmed:
6
2
2021
medline:
22
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The physiological adaptations that have evolved for egg laying make hens susceptible to bone fractures and keel bone damage. In modern laying hen breeds, longer periods of egg laying could result in a greater risk of poor bone quality, and selection for increased egg production has frequently been stated to be a cause. However, the existing literature does not support this hypothesis. To test the hypothesis that egg production is associated with quality, breaking strength and density of bone, genetic correlations between these traits were estimated in White Leghorn and Rhode Island Red breeds. Genetic correlations of cortical and medullary bone material chemical properties with bone quality were also estimated, in order to identify methods to improve bone quality with appropriately targeted measurement of key traits. Estimates of heritability for bone quality traits were moderate (0.19-0.59) for both White Leghorn and Rhode Island Red breeds, except for the keel bone trait, which had a heritability estimate equal to zero. There was no evidence for genetic or phenotypic relationships between post-peak egg production and bone quality. In the White Leghorn breed, the estimate of the genetic correlation between pre-peak production/age at first egg and bone quality was significant and negative (- 0.7 to - 0.4). Estimates of heritability of thermogravimetric measurements of tibial medullary bone mineralisation were significant (0.18-0.41), as were estimates of their genetic correlations with tibia breaking strength and density (0.6-0.9). The low genetic correlation of post-peak egg production with bone quality suggests that selection for increased persistency of egg production may not adversely affect bone quality. Onset of puberty and mineralisation of the medullary bone, which is a specialised adaptation for egg laying, were identified as important factors associated with the quality of the skeleton later during egg production. These are traits for which genetic, as well as environmental and management factors can positively impact the overall quality of the skeleton of laying hens.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The physiological adaptations that have evolved for egg laying make hens susceptible to bone fractures and keel bone damage. In modern laying hen breeds, longer periods of egg laying could result in a greater risk of poor bone quality, and selection for increased egg production has frequently been stated to be a cause. However, the existing literature does not support this hypothesis. To test the hypothesis that egg production is associated with quality, breaking strength and density of bone, genetic correlations between these traits were estimated in White Leghorn and Rhode Island Red breeds. Genetic correlations of cortical and medullary bone material chemical properties with bone quality were also estimated, in order to identify methods to improve bone quality with appropriately targeted measurement of key traits.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Estimates of heritability for bone quality traits were moderate (0.19-0.59) for both White Leghorn and Rhode Island Red breeds, except for the keel bone trait, which had a heritability estimate equal to zero. There was no evidence for genetic or phenotypic relationships between post-peak egg production and bone quality. In the White Leghorn breed, the estimate of the genetic correlation between pre-peak production/age at first egg and bone quality was significant and negative (- 0.7 to - 0.4). Estimates of heritability of thermogravimetric measurements of tibial medullary bone mineralisation were significant (0.18-0.41), as were estimates of their genetic correlations with tibia breaking strength and density (0.6-0.9).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The low genetic correlation of post-peak egg production with bone quality suggests that selection for increased persistency of egg production may not adversely affect bone quality. Onset of puberty and mineralisation of the medullary bone, which is a specialised adaptation for egg laying, were identified as important factors associated with the quality of the skeleton later during egg production. These are traits for which genetic, as well as environmental and management factors can positively impact the overall quality of the skeleton of laying hens.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33541269
doi: 10.1186/s12711-021-00603-8
pii: 10.1186/s12711-021-00603-8
pmc: PMC7860618
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
11Subventions
Organisme : European Cooperation in Science and Technology
ID : CA15224
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BB/M028291/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BBS/E/D/20211553
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
ID : is Formas 2014-01840
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BBS/E/D/20211554
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria
ID : 291815
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BBS/E/D/05191132
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BB/P013759/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Biochem J. 1995 Sep 15;310 ( Pt 3):1045-51
pubmed: 7575401
J Anim Sci. 2018 Jun 29;96(7):2525-2535
pubmed: 29701819
Poult Sci. 2011 Aug;90(8):1645-51
pubmed: 21753198
Br Poult Sci. 2018 Feb;59(1):1-6
pubmed: 29129115
Br Poult Sci. 2019 Feb;60(1):1-7
pubmed: 30295510
Anim Reprod Sci. 2008 Dec;109(1-4):274-86
pubmed: 18375079
Br Poult Sci. 2003 Jul;44(3):365-73
pubmed: 12964619
Genet Sel Evol. 2020 Feb 24;52(1):13
pubmed: 32093603
Int J Paleopathol. 2018 Sep;22:135-139
pubmed: 30096630
Br Poult Sci. 2016 Jun;57(3):330-8
pubmed: 26982003
Br Poult Sci. 2009 Jul;50(4):443-50
pubmed: 19735013
Br Poult Sci. 2003 Dec;44(5):683-9
pubmed: 14965088
Poult Sci. 2000 Jul;79(7):1033-41
pubmed: 10901207
Anim Genet. 2013 Dec;44(6):661-8
pubmed: 23837723
Anim Genet. 2012 Aug;43(4):410-8
pubmed: 22497523
Front Physiol. 2018 Dec 20;9:1846
pubmed: 30618846
Poult Sci. 2006 Jul;85(7):1136-44
pubmed: 16830852
J Struct Biol. 2018 Jan;201(1):36-45
pubmed: 29109023
Animals (Basel). 2020 Dec 09;10(12):
pubmed: 33317220
Reproduction. 2011 Mar;141(3):381-9
pubmed: 21177954
PLoS One. 2018 May 9;13(5):e0194974
pubmed: 29742164
Anim Genet. 2007 Feb;38(1):45-9
pubmed: 17257187
Biol Sex Differ. 2018 May 29;9(1):20
pubmed: 29843787
Animals (Basel). 2015 Nov 27;5(4):1192-206
pubmed: 26633520
Br Poult Sci. 1994 Dec;35(5):651-62
pubmed: 7719730
Poult Sci. 2011 Aug;90(8):1637-44
pubmed: 21753197
Poult Sci. 2004 Feb;83(2):207-14
pubmed: 14979571
Br Poult Sci. 2000 Mar;41(1):33-40
pubmed: 10821520
Res Vet Sci. 1998 Jan-Feb;64(1):63-7
pubmed: 9557808
J Appl Genet. 2013 Feb;54(1):61-70
pubmed: 23001961
Br Poult Sci. 2004 Jun;45(3):320-30
pubmed: 15327118
Poult Sci. 1992 Dec;71(12):2090-8
pubmed: 1470592
Poult Sci. 2020 Sep;99(9):4183-4194
pubmed: 32867962
Br Poult Sci. 2006 Dec;47(6):742-55
pubmed: 17190683
Vet Rec. 2011 Oct 15;169(16):411-2
pubmed: 22001806
Poult Sci. 1984 Nov;63(11):2103-13
pubmed: 6514658