A 15 month experience with a primary care-based telemedicine screening program for diabetic retinopathy.
Diabetes
Diabetic retinopathy
Fundus photography
Retinal screening
Telemedicine
Teleophthalmology
Journal
BMC ophthalmology
ISSN: 1471-2415
Titre abrégé: BMC Ophthalmol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967802
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Feb 2021
04 Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
17
05
2020
accepted:
21
01
2021
entrez:
5
2
2021
pubmed:
6
2
2021
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Using telemedicine for diabetic retinal screening is becoming popular especially amongst at-risk urban communities with poor access to care. The goal of the diabetic telemedicine project at Temple University Hospital is to improve cost-effective access to appropriate retinal care to those in need of close monitoring and/or treatment. This will be a retrospective review of 15 months of data from March 2016 to May 2017. We will investigate how many patients were screened, how interpretable the photographs were, how often the photographs generated a diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy (DR) based on the screening photo, and how many patients followed-up for an exam in the office, if indicated. Six-hundred eighty-nine (689) digital retinal screening exams on 1377 eyes of diabetic patients were conducted in Temple's primary care clinic. The majority of the photographs were read to have no retinopathy (755, 54.8%). Among all of the screening exams, 357 (51.8%) triggered a request for a referral to ophthalmology. Four-hundred forty-nine (449, 32.6%) of the photos were felt to be uninterpretable by the clinician. Referrals were meant to be requested for DR found in one or both eyes, inability to assess presence of retinopathy in one or both eyes, or for suspicion of a different ophthalmic diagnosis. Sixty-seven patients (9.7%) were suspected to have another ophthalmic condition based on other findings in the retinal photographs. Among the 34 patients that were successfully completed a referral visit to Temple ophthalmology, there was good concordance between the level of DR detected by their screening fundus photographs and visit diagnosis. Although a little more than half of the patients did not have diabetic eye disease, about half needed a referral to ophthalmology. However, only 9.5% of the referral-warranted exams actually received an eye exam. Mere identification of referral-warranted diabetic retinopathy and other ophthalmic conditions is not enough. A successful telemedicine screening program must close the communication gap between screening and diagnosis by reviewer to provide timely follow-up by eye care specialists.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Using telemedicine for diabetic retinal screening is becoming popular especially amongst at-risk urban communities with poor access to care. The goal of the diabetic telemedicine project at Temple University Hospital is to improve cost-effective access to appropriate retinal care to those in need of close monitoring and/or treatment.
METHODS
METHODS
This will be a retrospective review of 15 months of data from March 2016 to May 2017. We will investigate how many patients were screened, how interpretable the photographs were, how often the photographs generated a diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy (DR) based on the screening photo, and how many patients followed-up for an exam in the office, if indicated.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Six-hundred eighty-nine (689) digital retinal screening exams on 1377 eyes of diabetic patients were conducted in Temple's primary care clinic. The majority of the photographs were read to have no retinopathy (755, 54.8%). Among all of the screening exams, 357 (51.8%) triggered a request for a referral to ophthalmology. Four-hundred forty-nine (449, 32.6%) of the photos were felt to be uninterpretable by the clinician. Referrals were meant to be requested for DR found in one or both eyes, inability to assess presence of retinopathy in one or both eyes, or for suspicion of a different ophthalmic diagnosis. Sixty-seven patients (9.7%) were suspected to have another ophthalmic condition based on other findings in the retinal photographs. Among the 34 patients that were successfully completed a referral visit to Temple ophthalmology, there was good concordance between the level of DR detected by their screening fundus photographs and visit diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Although a little more than half of the patients did not have diabetic eye disease, about half needed a referral to ophthalmology. However, only 9.5% of the referral-warranted exams actually received an eye exam. Mere identification of referral-warranted diabetic retinopathy and other ophthalmic conditions is not enough. A successful telemedicine screening program must close the communication gap between screening and diagnosis by reviewer to provide timely follow-up by eye care specialists.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33541295
doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-01828-3
pii: 10.1186/s12886-021-01828-3
pmc: PMC7859899
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
70Références
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2017 Feb 10;2016:590-599
pubmed: 28269855
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017 Jul 1;135(7):706-714
pubmed: 28520833
J Rural Health. 2001 Winter;17(1):25-31
pubmed: 11354719
Am J Manag Care. 2015 May 01;21(5):e297-302
pubmed: 26167777
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014 Mar 17;8(2):262-266
pubmed: 24876576
Diabetes Care. 2005 Feb;28(2):318-22
pubmed: 15677786
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb;133(2):174-81
pubmed: 25393129
Diabetes Care. 2019 Apr;42(4):651-656
pubmed: 30765436
Telemed J E Health. 2013 Dec;19(12):942-8
pubmed: 24102102
J Diabetes Complications. 2017 Aug;31(8):1348-1353
pubmed: 28551296
Acta Ophthalmol. 2018 Feb;96(1):63-68
pubmed: 29178249
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016 Feb 16;10(2):254-61
pubmed: 26888972
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006 Jan-Feb;13(1):40-51
pubmed: 16221935
JAMA. 1993 Oct 13;270(14):1714-8
pubmed: 8411502
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 18;9(2):e022594
pubmed: 30782868
Ophthalmology. 2017 Dec;124(12):1729-1734
pubmed: 28647202
Telemed J E Health. 2011 Jul-Aug;17(6):415-9
pubmed: 21675867