Automated Detection and Segmentation of Brain Metastases in Malignant Melanoma: Evaluation of a Dedicated Deep Learning Model.


Journal

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology
ISSN: 1936-959X
Titre abrégé: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8003708

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2021
Historique:
received: 17 03 2020
accepted: 21 10 2020
pubmed: 6 2 2021
medline: 13 10 2021
entrez: 5 2 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Malignant melanoma is an aggressive skin cancer in which brain metastases are common. Our aim was to establish and evaluate a deep learning model for fully automated detection and segmentation of brain metastases in patients with malignant melanoma using clinical routine MR imaging. Sixty-nine patients with melanoma with a total of 135 brain metastases at initial diagnosis and available multiparametric MR imaging datasets (T1-/T2-weighted, T1-weighted gadolinium contrast-enhanced, FLAIR) were included. A previously established deep learning model architecture (3D convolutional neural network; DeepMedic) simultaneously operating on the aforementioned MR images was trained on a cohort of 55 patients with 103 metastases using 5-fold cross-validation. The efficacy of the deep learning model was evaluated using an independent test set consisting of 14 patients with 32 metastases. Manual segmentations of metastases in a voxelwise manner (T1-weighted gadolinium contrast-enhanced imaging) performed by 2 radiologists in consensus served as the ground truth. After training, the deep learning model detected 28 of 32 brain metastases (mean volume, 1.0 [SD, 2.4] cm Deep learning-based automated detection and segmentation of brain metastases in malignant melanoma yields high detection and segmentation accuracy with false-positive findings of <1 per scan.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
Malignant melanoma is an aggressive skin cancer in which brain metastases are common. Our aim was to establish and evaluate a deep learning model for fully automated detection and segmentation of brain metastases in patients with malignant melanoma using clinical routine MR imaging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Sixty-nine patients with melanoma with a total of 135 brain metastases at initial diagnosis and available multiparametric MR imaging datasets (T1-/T2-weighted, T1-weighted gadolinium contrast-enhanced, FLAIR) were included. A previously established deep learning model architecture (3D convolutional neural network; DeepMedic) simultaneously operating on the aforementioned MR images was trained on a cohort of 55 patients with 103 metastases using 5-fold cross-validation. The efficacy of the deep learning model was evaluated using an independent test set consisting of 14 patients with 32 metastases. Manual segmentations of metastases in a voxelwise manner (T1-weighted gadolinium contrast-enhanced imaging) performed by 2 radiologists in consensus served as the ground truth.
RESULTS
After training, the deep learning model detected 28 of 32 brain metastases (mean volume, 1.0 [SD, 2.4] cm
CONCLUSIONS
Deep learning-based automated detection and segmentation of brain metastases in malignant melanoma yields high detection and segmentation accuracy with false-positive findings of <1 per scan.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33541907
pii: ajnr.A6982
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6982
pmc: PMC8040988
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

655-662

Informations de copyright

© 2021 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Auteurs

L Pennig (L)

From the Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (L.P., R.S., L.C., S.L., F.T., D.Z., M.P., C.K., J.B., K.R.L.).

R Shahzad (R)

From the Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (L.P., R.S., L.C., S.L., F.T., D.Z., M.P., C.K., J.B., K.R.L.).
Philips Innovative Technologies (R.S., F.T., M.P.), Aachen, Germany.

L Caldeira (L)

From the Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (L.P., R.S., L.C., S.L., F.T., D.Z., M.P., C.K., J.B., K.R.L.).

S Lennartz (S)

From the Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (L.P., R.S., L.C., S.L., F.T., D.Z., M.P., C.K., J.B., K.R.L.).

F Thiele (F)

From the Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (L.P., R.S., L.C., S.L., F.T., D.Z., M.P., C.K., J.B., K.R.L.).
Philips Innovative Technologies (R.S., F.T., M.P.), Aachen, Germany.

L Goertz (L)

Center for Neurosurgery (L.G., G.F., S.G.), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

D Zopfs (D)

From the Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (L.P., R.S., L.C., S.L., F.T., D.Z., M.P., C.K., J.B., K.R.L.).

A-K Meißner (AK)

Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery (A.-K.M., G.F.), Center for Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

G Fürtjes (G)

Center for Neurosurgery (L.G., G.F., S.G.), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery (A.-K.M., G.F.), Center for Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

M Perkuhn (M)

From the Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (L.P., R.S., L.C., S.L., F.T., D.Z., M.P., C.K., J.B., K.R.L.).
Philips Innovative Technologies (R.S., F.T., M.P.), Aachen, Germany.

C Kabbasch (C)

From the Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (L.P., R.S., L.C., S.L., F.T., D.Z., M.P., C.K., J.B., K.R.L.).

S Grau (S)

Center for Neurosurgery (L.G., G.F., S.G.), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

J Borggrefe (J)

From the Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (L.P., R.S., L.C., S.L., F.T., D.Z., M.P., C.K., J.B., K.R.L.).

K R Laukamp (KR)

From the Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (L.P., R.S., L.C., S.L., F.T., D.Z., M.P., C.K., J.B., K.R.L.) kai.laukamp@uk-koeln.de.
Department of Radiology (K.R.L.), University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.
Department of Radiology (K.R.L.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH