Spatial asymmetry of the paternity success in nests of a fish with alternative reproductive tactics.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 02 2021
04 02 2021
Historique:
received:
19
10
2020
accepted:
20
01
2021
entrez:
5
2
2021
pubmed:
6
2
2021
medline:
10
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Guard-sneaker tactics are widespread among fish, where territorial males defend a nest and provide parental care while sneakers try to steal fertilizations. Territorials and sneakers adopt diverse pre- and post-mating strategies, adjusting their ejaculate investment and/or behavioural responses to the presence of competitors. The relative distance of competitors from the spawning female plays a major role in influencing male mating strategies and the resulting paternity share. However, territorial male quality and sneaking intensity do not fully account for the variability in the relative siring success occurring among species. An often neglected factor potentially affecting sneakers proximity to females is the nest structure. We conducted a field experiment using the black goby, whose nests show two openings of different size. We found that territorial males defend more and sneaking pressure is higher at the front, larger access of the nest than at the back, smaller one. Moreover, microsatellite paternity analysis shows that territorials sire more offspring at the back of their nest. Such a predictable spatial distribution of the paternity share suggests that nest structure might work as an indirect cue of male relative siring success, potentially influencing the territorial male investment in parental care and/or the female egg deposition strategy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33542278
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82508-6
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-82508-6
pmc: PMC7862370
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3091Références
Bioinformatics. 2012 Oct 1;28(19):2537-9
pubmed: 22820204
J Evol Biol. 2003 Sep;16(5):896-902
pubmed: 14635904
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Jan 30;280(1755):20122891
pubmed: 23363633
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2010 Nov;85(4):935-56
pubmed: 20569253
Behav Ecol. 2009 Mar;20(2):416-420
pubmed: 19461866
Am Nat. 2007 Feb;169(2):258-63
pubmed: 17211808
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jul 31;98(16):9151-6
pubmed: 11481481
Sci Adv. 2018 May 23;4(5):eaap8563
pubmed: 29806019
J Hered. 2014 May-Jun;105(3):416-22
pubmed: 24574486
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46711
pubmed: 23056415
Anim Cogn. 2003 Jun;6(2):87-92
pubmed: 12687419
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jul 23;99(15):9913-5
pubmed: 12107282
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Sep 7;277(1694):2627-35
pubmed: 20410042
Mol Ecol Resour. 2008 Jan;8(1):103-6
pubmed: 21585727
J Evol Biol. 2016 Dec;29(12):2362-2372
pubmed: 27654134
Trends Ecol Evol. 2017 May;32(5):368-382
pubmed: 28318651
Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Aug 7;269(1500):1549-53
pubmed: 12184824
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Nov 7;281(1794):20140253
pubmed: 25232141
J Exp Biol. 2018 Jul 30;221(Pt 14):
pubmed: 29844197
Mol Ecol Resour. 2010 May;10(3):564-7
pubmed: 21565059
Theriogenology. 2017 Apr 1;92:24-29
pubmed: 28237338
J Fish Biol. 2016 Dec;89(6):2643-2657
pubmed: 27696416
Trends Ecol Evol. 1996 Feb;11(2):92-8
pubmed: 21237769
Theor Appl Genet. 1996 Jun;92(8):966-75
pubmed: 24166623
Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Jul 22;269(1499):1435-41
pubmed: 12137572
Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Aug 7;268(1476):1559-65
pubmed: 11487402
J Fish Biol. 2012 Nov;81(6):2044-52
pubmed: 23130698