A novel experimental porcine model to assess the impact of differential pulmonary blood flow on ischemia-reperfusion injury after unilateral lung transplantation.
Porcine left lung transplantation
Primary graft dysfunction
Pulmonary vascular resistance
Journal
Intensive care medicine experimental
ISSN: 2197-425X
Titre abrégé: Intensive Care Med Exp
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101645149
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 Feb 2021
05 Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
21
08
2020
accepted:
20
01
2021
entrez:
5
2
2021
pubmed:
6
2
2021
medline:
6
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) remains a major obstacle after lung transplantation. Ischemia-reperfusion injury is a known contributor to the development of PGD following lung transplantation. We developed a novel approach to assess the impact of increased pulmonary blood flow in a large porcine single-left lung transplantation model. Twelve porcine left lung transplants were divided in two groups (n = 6, in low- (LF) and high-flow (HF) group). Donor lungs were stored for 24 h on ice, followed by left lung transplantation. In the HF group, recipient animals were observed for 6 h after reperfusion with partially clamping right pulmonary artery to achieve a higher flow (target flow 40-60% of total cardiac output) to the transplanted lung compared to the LF group, where the right pulmonary artery was not clamped. Survival at 6 h was 100% in both groups. Histological, functional and biological assessment did not significantly differ between both groups during the first 6 h of reperfusion. injury was also present in the right native lung and showed signs compatible with the pathophysiological hallmarks of ischemia-reperfusion injury. Partial clamping native pulmonary artery in large animal lung transplantation setting to study the impact of low versus high pulmonary flow on the development of ischemia reperfusion is feasible. In our study, differential blood flow had no effect on IRI. However, our findings might impact future studies with extracorporeal devices and represent a specific intra-operative problem during bilateral sequential single-lung transplantation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) remains a major obstacle after lung transplantation. Ischemia-reperfusion injury is a known contributor to the development of PGD following lung transplantation. We developed a novel approach to assess the impact of increased pulmonary blood flow in a large porcine single-left lung transplantation model.
MATERIALS
METHODS
Twelve porcine left lung transplants were divided in two groups (n = 6, in low- (LF) and high-flow (HF) group). Donor lungs were stored for 24 h on ice, followed by left lung transplantation. In the HF group, recipient animals were observed for 6 h after reperfusion with partially clamping right pulmonary artery to achieve a higher flow (target flow 40-60% of total cardiac output) to the transplanted lung compared to the LF group, where the right pulmonary artery was not clamped.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Survival at 6 h was 100% in both groups. Histological, functional and biological assessment did not significantly differ between both groups during the first 6 h of reperfusion. injury was also present in the right native lung and showed signs compatible with the pathophysiological hallmarks of ischemia-reperfusion injury.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Partial clamping native pulmonary artery in large animal lung transplantation setting to study the impact of low versus high pulmonary flow on the development of ischemia reperfusion is feasible. In our study, differential blood flow had no effect on IRI. However, our findings might impact future studies with extracorporeal devices and represent a specific intra-operative problem during bilateral sequential single-lung transplantation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33543363
doi: 10.1186/s40635-021-00371-1
pii: 10.1186/s40635-021-00371-1
pmc: PMC7862464
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
4Références
Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1998 May;18(5):653-61
pubmed: 9569235
Free Radic Biol Med. 1997;23(1):47-56
pubmed: 9165296
Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2014 Jul 11;16:505-32
pubmed: 24905872
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997 Dec;17(12):3570-7
pubmed: 9437207
J Surg Res. 2011 Nov;171(1):e107-11
pubmed: 21872270
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003 Feb 15;167(4):490-511
pubmed: 12588712
Nat Protoc. 2018 Aug;13(8):1814-1828
pubmed: 30072720
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2008 Sep;295(3):L379-99
pubmed: 18621912
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Jan;41(1):154-61
pubmed: 21900017
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Jun;157(6):2515-2525.e10
pubmed: 30922636
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018 Dec;37(12):1418-1424
pubmed: 30193763
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2008 Feb;4(1):49-59
pubmed: 19924277
Eur Respir J. 2019 Jan 24;53(1):
pubmed: 30545979
Eur Respir J. 2002 Nov;20(5):1314-31
pubmed: 12449189
Front Physiol. 2018 Jun 07;9:524
pubmed: 29930512
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2010 Nov;299(5):H1283-99
pubmed: 20833966
Transplant Proc. 2007 Sep;39(7):2425-6
pubmed: 17889209
Acta Chir Belg. 2006 Jul-Aug;106(4):450-7
pubmed: 17017708
Circ Res. 1965 May;16:482-8
pubmed: 14289157
Antioxid Redox Signal. 2014 Feb 20;20(6):872-86
pubmed: 23758611
Antioxid Redox Signal. 2014 Feb 20;20(6):868-71
pubmed: 24354342
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Mar 1;187(5):527-34
pubmed: 23306540
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017 Oct;36(10):1097-1103
pubmed: 28942784
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Mar;155(3):1316-1328.e1
pubmed: 29248282
Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2009 Jan;6(1):16-26
pubmed: 19029993
Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013 Mar;17(1):28-43
pubmed: 23042205
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2017 Apr 1;312(4):L531-L541
pubmed: 28130262
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Jun;137(6):1493-8
pubmed: 19464470
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 May;155(5):2193-2206.e3
pubmed: 29653665
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2002 Jun;21(6):687-91
pubmed: 12057703
Cell Biochem Biophys. 2008;52(3):125-38
pubmed: 18982455
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006 Dec;25(12):1467-73
pubmed: 17178343
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2014 Nov 1;307(9):L668-80
pubmed: 25239915