College of American Pathologists Tumor Regression Grading System for Long-Term Outcome in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.
Adjuvant chemotherapy
Locally advanced rectal cancer
Neoadjuvant treatments
Survival outcome
Tumor regression grade system
Journal
The oncologist
ISSN: 1549-490X
Titre abrégé: Oncologist
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9607837
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2021
05 2021
Historique:
received:
14
07
2020
accepted:
28
01
2021
pubmed:
6
2
2021
medline:
6
7
2021
entrez:
5
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The National Comprehensive Cancer Network's Rectal Cancer Guideline Panel recommends American Joint Committee of Cancer and College of American Pathologists (AJCC/CAP) tumor regression grading (TRG) system to evaluate pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Yet, the clinical significance of the AJCC/CAP TRG system has not been fully defined. This was a multicenter, retrospectively recruited, and prospectively maintained cohort study. Patients with LARC from one institution formed the discovery set, and cases from external independent institutions formed a validation set to verify the findings from discovery set. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank test, and Cox regression model. The discovery set (940 cases) found, and the validation set (2,156 cases) further confirmed, that inferior AJCC/CAP TRG categories were closely /ccorrelated with unfavorable survival (OS, DFS, LRFS, and DMFS) and higher risk of disease progression (death, accumulative relapse, local recurrence, and distant metastasis) (all p < .05). Significantly, pairwise comparison revealed that any two of four TRG categories had the distinguished survival and risk of disease progression. After propensity score matching, AJCC/CAP TRG0 category (pathological complete response) patients treated with or without adjuvant chemotherapy displayed similar survival of OS, DFS, LRFS, and DMFS (all p > .05). For AJCC/CAP TRG1-3 cases, adjuvant chemotherapy treatment significantly improved 3-year OS (90.2% vs. 84.6%, p < .001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated the AJCC/CAP TRG system was an independent prognostic surrogate. AJCC/CAP TRG system, an accurate prognostic surrogate, appears ideal for further strategizing adjuvant chemotherapy for LARC. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends the American Joint Committee of Cancer and College of American Pathologists (AJCC/CAP) tumor regression grading (TRG) four-category system to evaluate the pathologic response to neoadjuvant treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer; however, the clinical significance of the AJCC/CAP TRG system has not yet been clearly addressed. This study found, for the first time, that any two of four AJCC/CAP TRG categories had the distinguished long-term survival outcome. Importantly, adjuvant chemotherapy may improve the 3-year overall survival for AJCC/CAP TRG1-3 category patients but not for AJCC/CAP TRG0 category patients. Thus, AJCC/CAP TRG system, an accurate surrogate of long-term survival outcome, is useful in guiding adjuvant chemotherapy management for rectal cancer.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The National Comprehensive Cancer Network's Rectal Cancer Guideline Panel recommends American Joint Committee of Cancer and College of American Pathologists (AJCC/CAP) tumor regression grading (TRG) system to evaluate pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Yet, the clinical significance of the AJCC/CAP TRG system has not been fully defined.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This was a multicenter, retrospectively recruited, and prospectively maintained cohort study. Patients with LARC from one institution formed the discovery set, and cases from external independent institutions formed a validation set to verify the findings from discovery set. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank test, and Cox regression model.
RESULTS
The discovery set (940 cases) found, and the validation set (2,156 cases) further confirmed, that inferior AJCC/CAP TRG categories were closely /ccorrelated with unfavorable survival (OS, DFS, LRFS, and DMFS) and higher risk of disease progression (death, accumulative relapse, local recurrence, and distant metastasis) (all p < .05). Significantly, pairwise comparison revealed that any two of four TRG categories had the distinguished survival and risk of disease progression. After propensity score matching, AJCC/CAP TRG0 category (pathological complete response) patients treated with or without adjuvant chemotherapy displayed similar survival of OS, DFS, LRFS, and DMFS (all p > .05). For AJCC/CAP TRG1-3 cases, adjuvant chemotherapy treatment significantly improved 3-year OS (90.2% vs. 84.6%, p < .001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated the AJCC/CAP TRG system was an independent prognostic surrogate.
CONCLUSION
AJCC/CAP TRG system, an accurate prognostic surrogate, appears ideal for further strategizing adjuvant chemotherapy for LARC.
IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE
The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends the American Joint Committee of Cancer and College of American Pathologists (AJCC/CAP) tumor regression grading (TRG) four-category system to evaluate the pathologic response to neoadjuvant treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer; however, the clinical significance of the AJCC/CAP TRG system has not yet been clearly addressed. This study found, for the first time, that any two of four AJCC/CAP TRG categories had the distinguished long-term survival outcome. Importantly, adjuvant chemotherapy may improve the 3-year overall survival for AJCC/CAP TRG1-3 category patients but not for AJCC/CAP TRG0 category patients. Thus, AJCC/CAP TRG system, an accurate surrogate of long-term survival outcome, is useful in guiding adjuvant chemotherapy management for rectal cancer.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33543577
doi: 10.1002/onco.13707
pmc: PMC8100558
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e780-e793Informations de copyright
© 2021 AlphaMed Press.
Références
Ann Oncol. 2018 Jul 1;29(7):1521-1527
pubmed: 29718095
Ann Surg. 2006 Dec;244(6):1024-30
pubmed: 17122629
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep 20;34(27):3300-7
pubmed: 27480145
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Jul 1;4(7):930-937
pubmed: 29710274
Colorectal Dis. 2014 Jan;16(1):O16-25
pubmed: 24119076
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Feb;17(2):174-183
pubmed: 26705854
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Sep;11(9):835-44
pubmed: 20692872
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jun;17(6):727-737
pubmed: 27155740
Lancet. 2018 Jun 23;391(10139):2537-2545
pubmed: 29976470
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Nov 1;36(31):3152-3161
pubmed: 30188786
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Sep 22;106(10):
pubmed: 25249540
JAMA Surg. 2018 Aug 1;153(8):e181607
pubmed: 29874375
Cell Rep. 2018 Apr 3;23(1):181-193.e7
pubmed: 29617659
Radiother Oncol. 2018 Sep;128(3):557-563
pubmed: 29929861
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Dec 10;28(35):5202-9
pubmed: 21060035
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jan 1;31(1):30-8
pubmed: 23169502
N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 21;351(17):1731-40
pubmed: 15496622
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jun 10;33(17):1878-80
pubmed: 25940719
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017 Dec 1;109(12):
pubmed: 29206996
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Jun;31(6):1163-8
pubmed: 27044403
Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Sep;56(9):1093-101
pubmed: 23929020
Cancer Cell. 2018 Dec 10;34(6):1012-1026.e3
pubmed: 30537506
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jun;18(6):e354-e363
pubmed: 28593861
J Clin Oncol. 2014 May 20;32(15):1554-62
pubmed: 24752056
Ann Oncol. 2007 Feb;18(2):299-304
pubmed: 17060484
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Aug;16(8):957-66
pubmed: 26187751
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Feb;20(2):189-190
pubmed: 30712795
Ann Oncol. 2015 Sep;26(9):1936-1941
pubmed: 26162609
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Apr 1;5(4):e185896
pubmed: 30629084
Int J Cancer. 2015 Jul 1;137(1):212-20
pubmed: 25418551
Cancer. 1994 Jun 1;73(11):2680-6
pubmed: 8194005
Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Jan;58(1):32-44
pubmed: 25489692