Evaluation and management of obstetric genital fistulas treated at a pelvic floor centre in Germany.
Faecal incontinence
Obstetric genital fistula
Rectovaginal fistula
Urethro-vaginal fistula
Urinary incontinence
Utero-vaginal fistula
Vesico-vaginal fistula
Journal
BMC women's health
ISSN: 1472-6874
Titre abrégé: BMC Womens Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088690
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 02 2021
05 02 2021
Historique:
received:
26
10
2020
accepted:
10
01
2021
entrez:
6
2
2021
pubmed:
7
2
2021
medline:
1
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Obstetric genital fistulas are an uncommon condition in developed countries. We evaluated their causes and management in women treated at a German pelvic floor centre. Women who had undergone surgery for obstetric genital fistulas between January 2006 and June 2020 were identified, and their records were reviewed retrospectively. Eleven out of 40 women presented with genitourinary fistulas, and 29 suffered from rectovaginal fistulas. In our cohort, genitourinary fistulas were more common in multiparous women (9/11), and rectovaginal fistulas were more common in primiparous women (24/29). The majority of the genitourinary fistulas were at a high anterior position in the vagina, and all rectovaginal fistulas were at a low posterior position. While all genitourinary fistulas were successfully closed, rectovaginal fistula closure was achieved in 88.65% of cases. Women who suffered from rectovaginal fistulas and were at high risk of recurrence or postoperative functional discomfort and desired another child, we recommended fistula repair in the context of a subsequent delivery. For the first time, pregnancy-related changes in the vaginal wall were used to optimize the success rate of fistula closure. In developed countries, birth itself can lead to injury-related genital fistulas. As fistula repair lacks evidence-based guidance, management must be tailored to the underlying pathology and the surgeon's experience. Attention should be directed towards preventive obstetric practice and adequate perinatal and postpartum care. Although vesicovaginal fistulas occur rarely, in case of urinary incontinence after delivery, attention should be paid to the patient, and a vesicovaginal fistula should be ruled out. Trial registration Retrospectively registered, DRKS 00022543, 28.07.2020.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Obstetric genital fistulas are an uncommon condition in developed countries. We evaluated their causes and management in women treated at a German pelvic floor centre.
METHODS
Women who had undergone surgery for obstetric genital fistulas between January 2006 and June 2020 were identified, and their records were reviewed retrospectively.
RESULTS
Eleven out of 40 women presented with genitourinary fistulas, and 29 suffered from rectovaginal fistulas. In our cohort, genitourinary fistulas were more common in multiparous women (9/11), and rectovaginal fistulas were more common in primiparous women (24/29). The majority of the genitourinary fistulas were at a high anterior position in the vagina, and all rectovaginal fistulas were at a low posterior position. While all genitourinary fistulas were successfully closed, rectovaginal fistula closure was achieved in 88.65% of cases. Women who suffered from rectovaginal fistulas and were at high risk of recurrence or postoperative functional discomfort and desired another child, we recommended fistula repair in the context of a subsequent delivery. For the first time, pregnancy-related changes in the vaginal wall were used to optimize the success rate of fistula closure.
CONCLUSIONS
In developed countries, birth itself can lead to injury-related genital fistulas. As fistula repair lacks evidence-based guidance, management must be tailored to the underlying pathology and the surgeon's experience. Attention should be directed towards preventive obstetric practice and adequate perinatal and postpartum care. Although vesicovaginal fistulas occur rarely, in case of urinary incontinence after delivery, attention should be paid to the patient, and a vesicovaginal fistula should be ruled out. Trial registration Retrospectively registered, DRKS 00022543, 28.07.2020.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33546671
doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01175-x
pii: 10.1186/s12905-021-01175-x
pmc: PMC7863292
doi:
Banques de données
DRKS
['DRKS00022543']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
52Références
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Oct;131(1):70-3
pubmed: 26233699
Int J Womens Health. 2016 Jul 01;8:243-8
pubmed: 27445505
Ger Med Sci. 2012;10:Doc15
pubmed: 23255878
Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Dec;25(12):1699-706
pubmed: 25062654
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Jan;148 Suppl 1:22-26
pubmed: 31943180
Surg Clin North Am. 2002 Dec;82(6):1261-72
pubmed: 12516853
Reprod Health. 2016 Nov 8;13(1):135
pubmed: 27821123
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Jun;27(6):859-64
pubmed: 26476822
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Jul;296(1):1-3
pubmed: 28573407
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 14;10(1):6358
pubmed: 32286390
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 May;295(5):1287-1288
pubmed: 28331995
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Sep;120(3):524-31
pubmed: 22914460
Zentralbl Chir. 2019 Aug;144(4):380-386
pubmed: 31291666
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Mar;29(3):345-351
pubmed: 28600757