Imaging-Based Outcome Prediction of Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage.
Intracerebral hemorrhage
Machine Learning
Outcome prediction
Radiomics
Journal
Translational stroke research
ISSN: 1868-601X
Titre abrégé: Transl Stroke Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101517297
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2021
12 2021
Historique:
received:
01
09
2020
accepted:
12
01
2021
revised:
03
01
2021
pubmed:
7
2
2021
medline:
19
2
2022
entrez:
6
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We hypothesized that imaging-only-based machine learning algorithms can analyze non-enhanced CT scans of patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). This retrospective multicenter cohort study analyzed 520 non-enhanced CT scans and clinical data of patients with acute spontaneous ICH. Clinical outcome at hospital discharge was dichotomized into good outcome and poor outcome using different modified Rankin Scale (mRS) cut-off values. Predictive performance of a random forest machine learning approach based on filter- and texture-derived high-end image features was evaluated for differentiation of functional outcome at mRS 2, 3, and 4. Prediction of survival (mRS ≤ 5) was compared to results of the ICH Score. All models were tuned, validated, and tested in a nested 5-fold cross-validation approach. Receiver-operating-characteristic area under the curve (ROC AUC) of the machine learning classifier using image features only was 0.80 (95% CI [0.77; 0.82]) for predicting mRS ≤ 2, 0.80 (95% CI [0.78; 0.81]) for mRS ≤ 3, and 0.79 (95% CI [0.77; 0.80]) for mRS ≤ 4. Trained on survival prediction (mRS ≤ 5), the classifier reached an AUC of 0.80 (95% CI [0.78; 0.82]) which was equivalent to results of the ICH Score. If combined, the integrated model showed a significantly higher AUC of 0.84 (95% CI [0.83; 0.86], P value <0.05). Accordingly, sensitivities were significantly higher at Youden Index maximum cut-offs (77% vs. 74% sensitivity at 76% specificity, P value <0.05). Machine learning-based evaluation of quantitative high-end image features provided the same discriminatory power in predicting functional outcome as multidimensional clinical scoring systems. The integration of conventional scores and image features had synergistic effects with a statistically significant increase in AUC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33547592
doi: 10.1007/s12975-021-00891-8
pii: 10.1007/s12975-021-00891-8
pmc: PMC8557152
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
958-967Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Dec 1;2(12):1636-1642
pubmed: 27541161
Neurology. 1984 May;34(5):653-7
pubmed: 6538656
Stroke. 1993 Jul;24(7):987-93
pubmed: 8322400
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 20;18(1):145
pubmed: 30458727
Stroke. 2018 May;49(5):1299-1307
pubmed: 29618558
Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):3416-3423
pubmed: 31735138
Phys Med Biol. 2016 Jul 7;61(13):R150-66
pubmed: 27269645
Front Neurol. 2012 May 25;3:86
pubmed: 22654784
BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Mar 17;12:77
pubmed: 21414208
Front Neurol. 2018 Feb 28;9:100
pubmed: 29541054
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013 Jun-Jul;34(6):1139-44
pubmed: 23306009
Radiology. 2019 Feb;290(2):479-487
pubmed: 30526358
Stroke. 2001 Apr;32(4):891-7
pubmed: 11283388
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 22;363(4):301-4
pubmed: 20551152
Radiology. 2016 Feb;278(2):563-77
pubmed: 26579733
Clin Neuroradiol. 2020 Dec;30(4):761-768
pubmed: 31776595
Stroke. 2019 May;50(5):1263-1265
pubmed: 30890116
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1975 Oct 20;405(2):442-51
pubmed: 1180967
Stroke. 2015 Jul;46(7):2032-60
pubmed: 26022637
Neurology. 2007 May 15;68(20):1651-7
pubmed: 17502545
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 9;13(11):e0207192
pubmed: 30412613
Stroke. 2016 Nov;47(11):2776-2782
pubmed: 27703089
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2018 Mar;89(3):263-270
pubmed: 29030422
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 15;9(7):e102107
pubmed: 25025374
Stroke. 2015 Apr;46(4):1116-9
pubmed: 25721012
J Neurol Sci. 2020 Feb 15;409:116628
pubmed: 31862517
Eur J Neurol. 2020 Oct;27(10):2006-2013
pubmed: 32426869
BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 13;8(8):e021719
pubmed: 30104314
Eur J Neurol. 2011 Nov;18(11):1323-8
pubmed: 21457176
NPJ Digit Med. 2018 Apr 4;1:9
pubmed: 31304294
Eur Radiol. 2018 Dec;28(12):4949-4958
pubmed: 29948072
Ann Oncol. 2017 Jun 1;28(6):1191-1206
pubmed: 28168275
Lancet Neurol. 2019 Sep;18(9):857-864
pubmed: 31397290
Ann Neurol. 2019 Oct;86(4):480-492
pubmed: 31364773
Front Neurol. 2019 Aug 21;10:910
pubmed: 31496988
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec;14(12):749-762
pubmed: 28975929
Stroke. 2020 Apr;51(4):1333-1338
pubmed: 32078490