Examining barriers to healthcare access and utilization of antenatal care services: evidence from demographic health surveys in sub-Saharan Africa.
Access
Antenatal care
Disparities
Health care
Health services
Inequalities
Sub-Saharan Africa; Global Health; public health
Utilization
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Feb 2021
06 Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
25
05
2020
accepted:
28
01
2021
entrez:
7
2
2021
pubmed:
8
2
2021
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Antenatal care utilization is one of the means for reducing the high maternal mortality rates in sub-Saharan Africa. This study examined the association between barriers to healthcare access and implementation of the 2016 WHO antenatal care services model among pregnant women seeking antenatal care in selected countries in sub-Saharan Africa. This study considered only Demographic and Health Survey data collected in 2018 in sub-Saharan Africa. Hence, the Demographic and Health Survey data of four countries in sub-Saharan Africa (Nigeria, Mali, Guinea and Zambia) were used. A sample of 6761 from Nigeria, 1973 from Mali, 1690 from Guinea and 1570 from Zambia was considered. Antenatal care visits, categorized as < 8 visits or ≥8 visits, and time of the first antenatal care visit, categorized as ≤3 months or > 3 months (as per the WHO recommendations) were the outcome variables for this study. Both descriptive statistics and ordinal logistic regression were used to analyze the data. Crude odds ratios (cOR) and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and p-values < 0.05 were used for the interpretation of results. With timing of antenatal care visits, getting money needed for treatment (aOR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.03-1.92) influenced early timing of antenatal care visits in Mali whereas getting permission to visit the health facility (aOR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.15-2.33) motivated women to have early timing of antenatal care visits in Guinea. We found that women who considered getting money needed for treatment as not a big problem in Nigeria were more likely to have the recommended number of antenatal care visits (aOR = 1.38, 95% CI= 1.11-1.73). On the contrary, in Guinea, Zambia and Mali, getting permission to visit health facilities, getting money for treatment, distance to the health facility and not wanting to go alone were not barriers to having ≥ 8 antenatal care visits. Our study has emphasized the role played by barriers to healthcare access in antenatal care utilization across sub-Saharan African countries. There is the need for governmental and non-governmental organizations to ensure that policies geared towards improving the quality of antenatal care and promoting good interaction between health care seekers and health care providers are integrated within the health system.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Antenatal care utilization is one of the means for reducing the high maternal mortality rates in sub-Saharan Africa. This study examined the association between barriers to healthcare access and implementation of the 2016 WHO antenatal care services model among pregnant women seeking antenatal care in selected countries in sub-Saharan Africa.
METHODS
METHODS
This study considered only Demographic and Health Survey data collected in 2018 in sub-Saharan Africa. Hence, the Demographic and Health Survey data of four countries in sub-Saharan Africa (Nigeria, Mali, Guinea and Zambia) were used. A sample of 6761 from Nigeria, 1973 from Mali, 1690 from Guinea and 1570 from Zambia was considered. Antenatal care visits, categorized as < 8 visits or ≥8 visits, and time of the first antenatal care visit, categorized as ≤3 months or > 3 months (as per the WHO recommendations) were the outcome variables for this study. Both descriptive statistics and ordinal logistic regression were used to analyze the data. Crude odds ratios (cOR) and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and p-values < 0.05 were used for the interpretation of results.
RESULTS
RESULTS
With timing of antenatal care visits, getting money needed for treatment (aOR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.03-1.92) influenced early timing of antenatal care visits in Mali whereas getting permission to visit the health facility (aOR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.15-2.33) motivated women to have early timing of antenatal care visits in Guinea. We found that women who considered getting money needed for treatment as not a big problem in Nigeria were more likely to have the recommended number of antenatal care visits (aOR = 1.38, 95% CI= 1.11-1.73). On the contrary, in Guinea, Zambia and Mali, getting permission to visit health facilities, getting money for treatment, distance to the health facility and not wanting to go alone were not barriers to having ≥ 8 antenatal care visits.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Our study has emphasized the role played by barriers to healthcare access in antenatal care utilization across sub-Saharan African countries. There is the need for governmental and non-governmental organizations to ensure that policies geared towards improving the quality of antenatal care and promoting good interaction between health care seekers and health care providers are integrated within the health system.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33549089
doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06129-5
pii: 10.1186/s12913-021-06129-5
pmc: PMC7866461
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
125Références
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 7;9(10):e031890
pubmed: 31594900
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Dec;6(12):e1297-e1308
pubmed: 30361107
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 02;10(9):e0134905
pubmed: 26331846
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Oct;65(8):1666-82
pubmed: 17643685
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Dec 13;12:151
pubmed: 23237601
Malar J. 2011 Nov 13;10:341
pubmed: 22078175
Health Policy Plan. 2015 Feb;30(1):78-87
pubmed: 24357197
Pan Afr Med J. 2017 Mar 03;26:124
pubmed: 28533847
PLoS One. 2018 May 21;13(5):e0197324
pubmed: 29782511
Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2017 Nov 7;3:19
pubmed: 29142757
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Oct 21;19(1):366
pubmed: 31638927
Pan Afr Med J. 2015 Aug 31;21:321
pubmed: 26587168
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Apr;5(4):e448-e457
pubmed: 28237252
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Jan 1;111(1):22-29
pubmed: 28340207
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jan 18;18(1):33
pubmed: 29347930
Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Jun;2(6):e323-33
pubmed: 25103301
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Mar 09;16:51
pubmed: 26960599
Health Care Women Int. 2017 Jan;38(1):17-37
pubmed: 27537979
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1973 Winter;51(1):95-124
pubmed: 4198894
Afr Health Sci. 2015 Mar;15(1):217-25
pubmed: 25834551
Hum Resour Health. 2019 Aug 5;17(1):63
pubmed: 31382972
Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 6;6(1):110
pubmed: 28587676
BMC Public Health. 2019 Nov 8;19(1):1493
pubmed: 31703734
ScientificWorldJournal. 2013 Oct 28;2013:423403
pubmed: 24288482
BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 8;8(11):e021223
pubmed: 30413495
Int J MCH AIDS. 2015;4(1):35-46
pubmed: 27622001
Pan Afr Med J. 2016 Oct 24;25:109
pubmed: 28292072
Int J Epidemiol. 2012 Dec;41(6):1602-13
pubmed: 23148108