Assessing the efficacy of a modified crushing technique for the management of concha bullosa: a cone beam computer tomography study.
Concha bullosa
Cone beam computed tomography
Crushing
Technique
Journal
Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology
ISSN: 1808-8686
Titre abrégé: Braz J Otorhinolaryngol
Pays: Brazil
ID NLM: 101207337
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
29
08
2020
revised:
05
11
2020
accepted:
14
12
2020
pubmed:
8
2
2021
medline:
2
11
2022
entrez:
7
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Although many surgical techniques exist to manage obstructive concha bullosa, there continues to be a drive to find the least invasive technique with the fewest complications and best results. The purpose of this study is to describe and assess the short- and long-term efficacy of a modified crushing technique for concha bullosa management. Patients who met inclusion criteria underwent a detailed nasal examination and cone beam computed tomography imaging prior to and after septoplasty with crushing surgery for obstructive concha bullosa. Patients were divided into short- and long-term groups based on their followup period such that the short-term group had a mean followup of 15.14 months (range 6-22 months) and the long-term group had a mean followup of 56.66 (range 29-80) months. Twenty-four cases of obstructive concha bullosa were included in this study with 13 short-term and 11 long-term follow-ups. All patients showed a significantly decreased postoperative CB size (p < 0.001). There was no correlation between age and postoperative CB change in area (p = 0.39) and no significant difference in the amount of postoperative CB area reduction between the short-term and long-term groups (p = 0.35). No patients experienced bleeding, synechia, conchal destruction, or olfactory dysfunction on followup evaluations. Our modified crushing technique is a simple, effective, and lasting treatment option for concha bullosa. From our experience, there have been no complications and no instances of concha bullosa reformation during the follow-up period.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33549509
pii: S1808-8694(21)00007-0
doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2020.12.012
pmc: PMC9615528
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
902-906Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.
Références
Laryngoscope. 2009 Dec;119(12):2454-6
pubmed: 19780034
J Radiol Prot. 2018 Dec;38(4):1371-1383
pubmed: 30255853
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Apr;105(4):512-8
pubmed: 17900939
J Endod. 2012 Aug;38(8):1069-74
pubmed: 22794207
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014 Sep;4(9):753-8
pubmed: 25145581
Laryngoscope. 2012 May;122(5):956-60
pubmed: 22447398
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2013 Jan;27(1):54-7
pubmed: 23406602
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2012 Dec;9(Suppl 1):S57-62
pubmed: 23814563
Laryngoscope. 2001 Jan;111(1):172-4
pubmed: 11192889
Laryngoscope. 1999 Sep;109(9):1442-5
pubmed: 10499052
Am J Otolaryngol. 2013 Sep-Oct;34(5):449-53
pubmed: 23702318
Rhinology. 1996 Mar;34(1):54-6
pubmed: 8739873
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Nov;273(11):3775-3781
pubmed: 27194152
Laryngoscope. 2010 Jul;120(7):1491; author reply 1492
pubmed: 20229584