Protocol for a systematic review of living labs in healthcare.


Journal

BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 02 2021
Historique:
entrez: 7 2 2021
pubmed: 8 2 2021
medline: 15 5 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Healthcare is increasingly challenged to meet the demands of user involvement and knowledge mobilisation required by the 21st-century patient-centred and knowledge-based economies. Innovations are needed to reduce problematic barriers to knowledge exchange and improve collaborative problem solving. Living labs, as open knowledge systems, have the potential to address these gaps but are underexplored in healthcare. We will conduct the first systematic review of living labs across healthcare contexts. We will comprehensively search the following online databases from inception to 31 December 2020: Scopus, the Cochrane Library (Wiley), Medline (OVID), Embase (OVID), Web of Science, PsycINFO (OVID) and EBSCOhost databases including Academic Search Complete, Business Source Premier, Canadian Reference Centre, CINAHL, MasterFILE Premier, SPORTDiscus, Library & Information Science Source, Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts, AgeLine, EconLit, Art Full Text, Women's Studies International and Social Work Abstracts. We will search for grey literature using Google advanced techniques and books/book chapters through scholarly and bibliographical databases. We will use a dual-reviewer, two-step selection process with pre-established inclusion criteria and limit to English language publications. Empirical studies of any design examining living lab development, implementation or evaluation in health or healthcare will be included. We will use the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for methodological quality appraisal and Covidence software for review management, and we will extract data on pre-established variables such as lab context and technological platforms. We will create evidence tables and analyse across variables such as focal aim and achievement of living lab principles, such as the use of cocreation and multimethod approaches. We will tabulate data for descriptive reporting and narrative synthesis to identify current applications, approaches and promising areas for living lab development across health contexts. Ethical approval was not required for this review. This review will inform research into living labs in health environments, including guidance for a living lab in paediatric rehabilitation. Academic publications shared through collaborative networks and social media channels will provide substantive knowledge to the growing tech-health development sector and to researchers, practitioners and organisations seeking enhanced patient/stakeholder engagement and innovations in knowledge translation and evidence-based practice. CRD42020175275.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33550226
pii: bmjopen-2020-039246
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039246
pmc: PMC7925912
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e039246

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Références

Eur J Public Health. 2020 Feb 1;30(1):55-63
pubmed: 31169898
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Jul 10;7(3):231-243
pubmed: 29524952
Nurs Open. 2019 Sep 10;6(4):1615-1625
pubmed: 31660190
Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 20;2:19
pubmed: 23514237
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Jun;27(11-12):2473-2480
pubmed: 28940657
Implement Sci. 2018 Feb 02;13(1):22
pubmed: 29394932
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2014 Oct;11(5):316-24
pubmed: 25132050
J R Soc Med. 2011 Dec;104(12):501-9
pubmed: 22179293
Qual Health Res. 1998 May;8(3):352-61
pubmed: 10558336
BMJ Open. 2021 May 4;11(5):e041530
pubmed: 33947723
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005 Jul;10 Suppl 1:6-20
pubmed: 16053580
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Aug;75(4):717-24
pubmed: 22627016
Milbank Q. 2005;83(4):843-95
pubmed: 16279970
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 7;8(4):e021775
pubmed: 29627820
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jul;111:49-59.e1
pubmed: 30905698

Auteurs

Mandy Archibald (M)

College of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada mandy.archibald@umanitoba.ca.

Sandra Wiebe (S)

College of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

Kendra Rieger (K)

School of Nursing, Trinity Western University, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

Janice Linton (J)

Neil John Maclean Health Sciences Library, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

Roberta Woodgate (R)

College of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH