Cognitive Mechanisms of Monolingual and Bilingual Children in Monoliterate Educational Settings: Evidence From Sentence Repetition.
bilingualism
literacy
sentence repetition
updating
verbal and non-verbal working memory
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
04
10
2020
accepted:
14
12
2020
entrez:
8
2
2021
pubmed:
9
2
2021
medline:
9
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Sentence repetition (SR) tasks have been extensively employed to assess bilingual children's linguistic and cognitive resources. The present study examined whether monoliterate bilingual children differ from their monolingual (and monoliterate) peers in SR accuracy and cognitive tasks, and investigated links between vocabulary, updating, verbal and visuospatial working memory and SR performance in the same children. Participants were two groups of 35 children, 8-12 years of age: one group consisted of Albanian-Greek monoliterate bilingual children and the other of Greek monolingual children attending a monolingual-Greek educational setting. The findings demonstrate that the two groups performed similarly in the grammaticality scores of the SR. However, monolinguals outperformed the monoliterate bilinguals in SR accuracy, as well as in the visuospatial working memory and updating tasks. The findings did not indicate any bilingual advantage in cognitive performance. The results also demonstrate that updating and visuospatial working memory significantly predicted monolingual children's SR accuracy scores, whereas Greek vocabulary predicted the performance of our monoliterate bilingual children in the same task. We attribute this outcome to the fact that monoliterate bilingual children do not rely on their fluid cognitive resources to perform the task, but instead rely on language proficiency (indicated by expressive vocabulary) while performing the SR.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33551924
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.613992
pmc: PMC7855031
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
613992Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Andreou, Tsimpli, Masoura and Agathopoulou.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Memory. 2001 Jul-Nov;9(4-6):349-63
pubmed: 11594357
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2013 Apr;38(1):1-10
pubmed: 22414332
Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Sep;15(9):388-94
pubmed: 21840749
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2013 Aug;78(4):103-18
pubmed: 23952205
Dev Sci. 2004 Jun;7(3):325-39
pubmed: 15595373
Dev Sci. 2015 Jan;18(1):146-54
pubmed: 24986395
Cognition. 2008 Jan;106(1):59-86
pubmed: 17275801
Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:1-29
pubmed: 21961947
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2012 Sep-Oct;47(5):499-510
pubmed: 22938061
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2018 Jul 5;49(3):537-550
pubmed: 29625426
Memory. 2011 Jul;19(5):529-37
pubmed: 21864216
J Exp Child Psychol. 2004 Feb;87(2):85-106
pubmed: 14757066
Psychol Aging. 2014 Jun;29(2):236-249
pubmed: 24955992
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2014 Sep-Oct;49(5):631-6
pubmed: 24894308
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2003 Mar;132(1):71-92
pubmed: 12656298
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2015 Jan-Feb;50(1):106-18
pubmed: 25208477
Cognition. 2009 Nov;113(2):135-49
pubmed: 19729156
J Exp Child Psychol. 2007 Jan;96(1):20-36
pubmed: 17010988
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2013 May-Jun;48(3):329-42
pubmed: 23650889
J Commun Disord. 2013 Jan-Feb;46(1):1-16
pubmed: 23021785
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Feb;145(2):246-258
pubmed: 26523426
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 29;8(10):e77770
pubmed: 24204957
Cortex. 2015 Aug;69:265-78
pubmed: 26048659
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2009 Dec;10(3):89-129
pubmed: 26168404
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006 Apr;49(2):219-36
pubmed: 16671840