Laparoscopic hepatectomy reduces postoperative complications and hospital stay in overweight and obese patients.

Cost Laparoscopic hepatectomy Morbidity Obesity Overweight Postoperative outcome

Journal

World journal of gastrointestinal surgery
ISSN: 1948-9366
Titre abrégé: World J Gastrointest Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101532473

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Jan 2021
Historique:
received: 17 08 2020
revised: 21 10 2020
accepted: 28 11 2020
entrez: 8 2 2021
pubmed: 9 2 2021
medline: 9 2 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Laparoscopic liver surgery is currently considered the standard of care for various liver malignancies. However, studies focusing on perioperative outcome after laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) in overweight patients are still sparse and its benefit compared to open hepatectomy (OH) is a matter of debate. To analyze postoperative outcomes in overweight [body mass index (BMI) over 25 kg/m²] and obese (BMI over 30 kg/m²) patients undergoing LH and compare postoperative outcome with patients undergoing OH. Perioperative data of 68 overweight (BMI over 25 kg/m²) including a subcohort of obese (BMI over 30 kg/m²) patients ( The mean BMI was 29.8 ± 4.9 kg/m LH is safe and cost-effective in overweight and obese patients. Furthermore, LH is significantly associated with fewer postoperative complications and reduced hospital stay compared to OH in these patients.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Laparoscopic liver surgery is currently considered the standard of care for various liver malignancies. However, studies focusing on perioperative outcome after laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) in overweight patients are still sparse and its benefit compared to open hepatectomy (OH) is a matter of debate.
AIM OBJECTIVE
To analyze postoperative outcomes in overweight [body mass index (BMI) over 25 kg/m²] and obese (BMI over 30 kg/m²) patients undergoing LH and compare postoperative outcome with patients undergoing OH.
METHODS METHODS
Perioperative data of 68 overweight (BMI over 25 kg/m²) including a subcohort of obese (BMI over 30 kg/m²) patients (
RESULTS RESULTS
The mean BMI was 29.8 ± 4.9 kg/m
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
LH is safe and cost-effective in overweight and obese patients. Furthermore, LH is significantly associated with fewer postoperative complications and reduced hospital stay compared to OH in these patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33552392
doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i1.19
pmc: PMC7830078
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

19-29

Informations de copyright

©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors report that there is no conflict of interest.

Références

Ann Surg. 2018 Nov;268(5):784-791
pubmed: 30272585
Arch Surg. 2011 Mar;146(3):348-56
pubmed: 21079109
Ann Surg. 2013 Jul;258(1):1-7
pubmed: 23728278
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Feb;14(2):355-61
pubmed: 17146738
HPB (Oxford). 2011 Feb;13(2):103-11
pubmed: 21241427
World J Gastroenterol. 2008 Mar 14;14(10):1553-8
pubmed: 18330947
Surg Endosc. 2018 Nov;32(11):4658-4665
pubmed: 29967997
Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr;26(4):964-9
pubmed: 22011951
Oncology. 2000 Jun;59(1):18-23
pubmed: 10895061
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Apr;60(4):433-445
pubmed: 28267012
World J Surg. 2015 May;39(5):1210-5
pubmed: 25561194
Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec;31(12):5356-5363
pubmed: 28593408
Asian J Surg. 2019 Jan;42(1):180-188
pubmed: 29273265
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 May;210(5):627-34, 634-6
pubmed: 20421019
Surg Endosc. 2017 May;31(5):2072-2088
pubmed: 27778169
J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Aug;14(8):1285-91
pubmed: 20532666
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2019 Jun;404(4):469-475
pubmed: 31065781
Surgery. 2015 Dec;158(6):1521-9
pubmed: 26297057
Am J Surg. 2000 Apr;179(4):275-81
pubmed: 10875985
HPB (Oxford). 2002;4(2):99; author reply 99-100
pubmed: 18332933
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016 Jun;26(3):e69-72
pubmed: 27258919
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar 14;22(10):3015-22
pubmed: 26973397
Surg Endosc. 2018 Dec;32(12):4833-4840
pubmed: 29770886
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2013 May;56(5-6):786-94
pubmed: 23703499
Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):187-96
pubmed: 19638912
Surg Endosc. 2015 Dec;29(12):3647-54
pubmed: 25737295
Ann Surg. 2005 Jan;241(1):69-76
pubmed: 15621993
BMC Anesthesiol. 2016 Jun 04;16(1):29
pubmed: 27259513
J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Jun;12(6):997-1004
pubmed: 17955310
Ann Surg. 2018 Feb;267(2):199-207
pubmed: 28657937

Auteurs

Daniel Heise (D)

Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen 52074, Germany. dheise@ukaachen.de.

Jan Bednarsch (J)

Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen 52074, Germany.

Andreas Kroh (A)

Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen 52074, Germany.

Sandra Schipper (S)

Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen 52074, Germany.

Roman Eickhoff (R)

Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen 52074, Germany.

Marielle Coolsen (M)

Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht 6229 HX, Netherlands.

Ronald Van Dam (R)

Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht 6229 HX, Netherlands.

Sven Lang (S)

Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen 52074, Germany.

Ulf Neumann (U)

Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen 52074, Germany.

Florian Ulmer (F)

Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen 52074, Germany.

Classifications MeSH