Return to Sport After Large Single-Surface, Multisurface, or Bipolar Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation in the Knee Using Shell Grafts.

knee meniscal allograft osteochondral allograft outcomes transplantation

Journal

Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine
ISSN: 2325-9671
Titre abrégé: Orthop J Sports Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101620522

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2021
Historique:
received: 19 05 2020
accepted: 11 06 2020
entrez: 8 2 2021
pubmed: 9 2 2021
medline: 9 2 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Return to sport (RTS) after osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation for large unipolar femoral condyle defects has been consistent, but many athletes are affected by more severe lesions. To examine outcomes for athletes who have undergone large single-surface, multisurface, or bipolar shell OCA transplantation in the knee. Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Data from a prospective OCA transplantation registry were assessed for athletes who underwent knee transplantation for the first time (primary transplant) between June 2015 and March 2018 for injury or overuse-related articular defects. Inclusion criteria were preinjury Tegner level ≥5 and documented type and level of sport (or elite unit active military duty); in addition, patients were required to have a minimum of 1-year follow-up outcomes, including RTS data. Patient characteristics, surgery type, Tegner level, RTS, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), compliance with rehabilitation, revisions, and failures were assessed and compared for statistically significant differences. There were 37 included athletes (mean age, 34 years; range, 15-69 years; mean body mass index, 26.2 kg/m Large single-surface, multisurface, or bipolar shell OCA knee transplantations in athletes resulted in two-thirds of these patients returning to sport at 16 to 24 months after transplantation. Combined, the revision and failure rates were 10%; thus, 90% of patients were considered to have successful 2- to 4-year outcomes with significant improvements in pain and function, even when patients did not RTS.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Return to sport (RTS) after osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation for large unipolar femoral condyle defects has been consistent, but many athletes are affected by more severe lesions.
PURPOSE OBJECTIVE
To examine outcomes for athletes who have undergone large single-surface, multisurface, or bipolar shell OCA transplantation in the knee.
STUDY DESIGN METHODS
Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS METHODS
Data from a prospective OCA transplantation registry were assessed for athletes who underwent knee transplantation for the first time (primary transplant) between June 2015 and March 2018 for injury or overuse-related articular defects. Inclusion criteria were preinjury Tegner level ≥5 and documented type and level of sport (or elite unit active military duty); in addition, patients were required to have a minimum of 1-year follow-up outcomes, including RTS data. Patient characteristics, surgery type, Tegner level, RTS, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), compliance with rehabilitation, revisions, and failures were assessed and compared for statistically significant differences.
RESULTS RESULTS
There were 37 included athletes (mean age, 34 years; range, 15-69 years; mean body mass index, 26.2 kg/m
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Large single-surface, multisurface, or bipolar shell OCA knee transplantations in athletes resulted in two-thirds of these patients returning to sport at 16 to 24 months after transplantation. Combined, the revision and failure rates were 10%; thus, 90% of patients were considered to have successful 2- to 4-year outcomes with significant improvements in pain and function, even when patients did not RTS.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33553437
doi: 10.1177/2325967120967928
pii: 10.1177_2325967120967928
pmc: PMC7841689
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

2325967120967928

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2021.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: J.L.C. is a member of the medical board of trustees of the Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation (MTF), which licenses the Missouri Osteochondral Preservation System (MOPS) used in the allograft procedures described in this study. J.L.C. and J.P.S. have received funding from the US Department of Defense and MTF related to this line of research conducted at the University of Missouri. J.L.C. has also received research support from Arthrex, the Coulter Foundation, DePuy Synthes, GE Healthcare, Merial, the MTF, Purina, and Zimmer Biomet; consulting fees from Arthrex and Trupanion; and speaking fees and royalties from Arthrex; and is a board member for the Midwest Transplant Network and MTF. J.P.S. has received research support from the Coulter Foundation; consulting fees from Acelity, Arthrex, DePuy Synthes, NuVasive, Orthopedic Designs North America, and Smith & Nephew; nonconsulting fees from Arthrex and Smtih & Nephew; faculty/speaker fees from DePuy; and royalties from Thieme. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.

Références

Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Nov 22;7(11):2325967119884291
pubmed: 31803790
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Oct;93(10):1411-5
pubmed: 21969444
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Oct;25(10):3186-3196
pubmed: 27539401
Am J Sports Med. 2020 May;48(6):1356-1364
pubmed: 32134685
Knee. 2010 Jun;17(3):196-9
pubmed: 20133136
Sports Health. 2016 Mar-Apr;8(2):153-60
pubmed: 26502188
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Dec;46(14):3541-3549
pubmed: 29039969
Lancet. 2017 Apr 8;389(10077):1424-1430
pubmed: 28209371
J Knee Surg. 2020 Apr;33(4):365-371
pubmed: 30727021
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Nov;464:83-7
pubmed: 17589362
Arthroscopy. 2016 Apr;32(4):651-68.e1
pubmed: 26524934
J Knee Surg. 2018 Sep;31(8):772-780
pubmed: 29228404
Clin Sports Med. 2018 Apr;37(2):307-330
pubmed: 29525030
Arthroscopy. 2019 Jun;35(6):1880-1889
pubmed: 31053460
J Orthop Res. 2016 Jan;34(1):31-8
pubmed: 26234194
Bone Joint J. 2016 Jan;98-B(1 Suppl A):105-12
pubmed: 26733654
J Knee Surg. 2017 Feb;30(2):179-184
pubmed: 27228198
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Apr 2;96(7):e58
pubmed: 24695935

Auteurs

James L Cook (JL)

Mizzou BioJoint Center, Missouri Orthopaedic Institute, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, USA.

Kylee Rucinski (K)

Mizzou BioJoint Center, Missouri Orthopaedic Institute, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, USA.

Cory R Crecelius (CR)

Mizzou BioJoint Center, Missouri Orthopaedic Institute, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, USA.

Richard Ma (R)

Mizzou BioJoint Center, Missouri Orthopaedic Institute, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, USA.

James P Stannard (JP)

Mizzou BioJoint Center, Missouri Orthopaedic Institute, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, USA.

Classifications MeSH