Infraspinatus or teres minor fatty infiltration does not influence patient outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a lateralized glenoid.

Fuchs Goutallier lateralized patient reported outcomes range of motion reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Journal

JSES international
ISSN: 2666-6383
Titre abrégé: JSES Int
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101763461

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2021
Historique:
entrez: 8 2 2021
pubmed: 9 2 2021
medline: 9 2 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Previous studies show that reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) may improve forward elevation (FE) but external rotation may remain impaired with substantial teres minor fatty infiltration. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of fatty infiltration on postoperative range of motion (ROM) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after RSA with a more lateralized center of rotation. About 69 patients (average age 69 years; 44 women, 25 men) with preoperative MRI, 1-year postoperative ROM, 2-year Veteran's Rand Survey, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons subjective form, and Single Alpha-Numeric Evaluation scores who underwent RSA with a lateralized glenoid component between 2010 and 2014 were identified. Patients with Fuchs stage 3 fatty degeneration were compared with patients with Fuchs stage ≤ 2 using a one-way ANOVA. Eleven patients had Fuchs stage 3 in the teres minor and 28 with stage 3 in the infraspinatus. Charlson comorbidity indices, Veteran's Rand Survey scores, age, and BMI were not different between groups. There were no differences after one year (follow-up = 15 ± 14 months) in FE (FE = 128 ± 29) or external rotation (33 ± 13) between groups. There were no differences in two-year minimum (follow-up = 42.9 ± 17.9 months) American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores between degenerated teres minor (76.4 ± 20) or infraspinatus (69.1 ± 24) groups. This is the first study to assess the influence of teres minor and infraspinatus fatty infiltration on the postoperative ROM and PROs with a more lateralized glenoid RSA implant. Our results show that in a more lateralized RSA, neither teres minor nor infraspinatus fatty infiltration appear to negatively influence ROM or PROs.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Previous studies show that reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) may improve forward elevation (FE) but external rotation may remain impaired with substantial teres minor fatty infiltration. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of fatty infiltration on postoperative range of motion (ROM) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after RSA with a more lateralized center of rotation.
METHODS METHODS
About 69 patients (average age 69 years; 44 women, 25 men) with preoperative MRI, 1-year postoperative ROM, 2-year Veteran's Rand Survey, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons subjective form, and Single Alpha-Numeric Evaluation scores who underwent RSA with a lateralized glenoid component between 2010 and 2014 were identified. Patients with Fuchs stage 3 fatty degeneration were compared with patients with Fuchs stage ≤ 2 using a one-way ANOVA.
RESULTS RESULTS
Eleven patients had Fuchs stage 3 in the teres minor and 28 with stage 3 in the infraspinatus. Charlson comorbidity indices, Veteran's Rand Survey scores, age, and BMI were not different between groups. There were no differences after one year (follow-up = 15 ± 14 months) in FE (FE = 128 ± 29) or external rotation (33 ± 13) between groups. There were no differences in two-year minimum (follow-up = 42.9 ± 17.9 months) American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores between degenerated teres minor (76.4 ± 20) or infraspinatus (69.1 ± 24) groups.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
This is the first study to assess the influence of teres minor and infraspinatus fatty infiltration on the postoperative ROM and PROs with a more lateralized glenoid RSA implant. Our results show that in a more lateralized RSA, neither teres minor nor infraspinatus fatty infiltration appear to negatively influence ROM or PROs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33554175
doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.09.019
pii: S2666-6383(20)30191-2
pmc: PMC7846691
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

109-113

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The Author(s).

Références

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Apr;26(4):564-572
pubmed: 28038912
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 Nov-Dec;18(6):892-6
pubmed: 19282204
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Aug;24(8):1314-21
pubmed: 25940380
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Jun;24(6):972-9
pubmed: 25547853
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 May;23(5):e108-17
pubmed: 24280351
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Mar;26(3):450-457
pubmed: 27751722
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Oct;21(10):1269-77
pubmed: 22056324
Am J Sports Med. 1994 Sep-Oct;22(5):578-84
pubmed: 7810778
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 May;458:78-82
pubmed: 17308474
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Nov;25(11):1889-1895
pubmed: 27374235
JB JS Open Access. 2018 Jul 12;3(3):e0056
pubmed: 30533594
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999 Nov-Dec;8(6):599-605
pubmed: 10633896
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Oct;25(10):1592-600
pubmed: 27107733
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Jan;23(1):49-57
pubmed: 23790326
J Orthop Res. 2015 Apr;33(4):605-13
pubmed: 25640775
Int J Shoulder Surg. 2015 Apr-Jun;9(2):60-7
pubmed: 25937717
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Mar;21(3):336-41
pubmed: 21816632
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Jun;20(4):652-8
pubmed: 21144775
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 May;92(5):1221-30
pubmed: 20439669
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Jun;90(6):751-6
pubmed: 18539668
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015 Sep;24(9):1397-404
pubmed: 26163281
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Jun;468(6):1558-64
pubmed: 19347412
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005 Jan-Feb;14(1 Suppl S):147S-161S
pubmed: 15726075
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Mar;466(3):584-93
pubmed: 18219547
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010 Jun;19(4):550-6
pubmed: 20335055
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Sep;21(9):1128-35
pubmed: 22036546
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Sep;469(9):2432-9
pubmed: 21213090
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Jun;22(6):807-13
pubmed: 22999850
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 May;89(5):940-7
pubmed: 17473129
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2013;71 Suppl 2:108-12
pubmed: 24328591
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Jul;(304):78-83
pubmed: 8020238
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 May;89(5):934-9
pubmed: 17473128
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571
Arthroscopy. 2012 Feb;28(2):154-9
pubmed: 22019235
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Oct;475(10):2564-2571
pubmed: 28616758

Auteurs

Adam Kwapisz (A)

Hawkins Foundation, Greenville, SC, USA.
Clinic of Orthopaedics and Pediatric Orthopedics, Medical University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland.

Jason P Rogers (JP)

Steadman Hawkins Clinic of the Carolinas, Prisma Health-Upstate, Greenville, SC, USA.

Charles A Thigpen (CA)

ATI Physical Therapy, Greenville, SC, USA.

Ellen Shanley (E)

ATI Physical Therapy, Greenville, SC, USA.

Eric Newton (E)

Hawkins Foundation, Greenville, SC, USA.

Kyle J Adams (KJ)

Hawkins Foundation, Greenville, SC, USA.

Ryan Alexander (R)

Hawkins Foundation, Greenville, SC, USA.

Richard J Hawkins (RJ)

Hawkins Foundation, Greenville, SC, USA.

Michael J Kissenberth (MJ)

Steadman Hawkins Clinic of the Carolinas, Prisma Health-Upstate, Greenville, SC, USA.

John M Tokish (JM)

Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Stephan G Pill (SG)

Steadman Hawkins Clinic of the Carolinas, Prisma Health-Upstate, Greenville, SC, USA.

Classifications MeSH