Raman imaging reveals in-situ microchemistry of cuticle and epidermis of spruce needles.

Cluster analysis Confocal Raman microscopy Cuticle Epidermis Microchemistry Non-negative matrix factorization Norway spruce Waxes

Journal

Plant methods
ISSN: 1746-4811
Titre abrégé: Plant Methods
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101245798

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Feb 2021
Historique:
received: 07 12 2020
accepted: 28 01 2021
entrez: 9 2 2021
pubmed: 10 2 2021
medline: 10 2 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The cuticle is a protective layer playing an important role in plant defense against biotic and abiotic stresses. So far cuticle structure and chemistry was mainly studied by electron microscopy and chemical extraction. Thus, analysing composition involved sample destruction and the link between chemistry and microstructure remained unclear. In the last decade, Raman imaging showed high potential to link plant anatomical structure with microchemistry and to give insights into orientation of molecules. In this study, we use Raman imaging and polarization experiments to study the native cuticle and epidermal layer of needles of Norway spruce, one of the economically most important trees in Europe. The acquired hyperspectral dataset is the basis to image the chemical heterogeneity using univariate (band integration) as well as multivariate data analysis (cluster analysis and non-negative matrix factorization). Confocal Raman microscopy probes the cuticle together with the underlying epidermis in the native state and tracks aromatics, lipids, carbohydrates and minerals with a spatial resolution of 300 nm. All three data analysis approaches distinguish a waxy, crystalline layer on top, in which aliphatic chains and coumaric acid are aligned perpendicular to the surface. Also in the lipidic amorphous cuticle beneath, strong signals of coumaric acid and flavonoids are detected. Even the unmixing algorithm results in mixed endmember spectra and confirms that lipids co-locate with aromatics. The underlying epidermal cell walls are devoid of lipids but show strong aromatic Raman bands. Especially the upper periclinal thicker cell wall is impregnated with aromatics. At the interface between epidermis and cuticle Calcium oxalate crystals are detected in a layer-like fashion. Non-negative matrix factorization gives the purest component spectra, thus the best match with reference spectra and by this promotes band assignments and interpretation of the visualized chemical heterogeneity. Results sharpen our view about the cuticle as the outermost layer of plants and highlight the aromatic impregnation throughout. In the future, developmental studies tracking lipid and aromatic pathways might give new insights into cuticle formation and comparative studies might deepen our understanding why some trees and their needle and leaf surfaces are more resistant to biotic and abiotic stresses than others.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The cuticle is a protective layer playing an important role in plant defense against biotic and abiotic stresses. So far cuticle structure and chemistry was mainly studied by electron microscopy and chemical extraction. Thus, analysing composition involved sample destruction and the link between chemistry and microstructure remained unclear. In the last decade, Raman imaging showed high potential to link plant anatomical structure with microchemistry and to give insights into orientation of molecules. In this study, we use Raman imaging and polarization experiments to study the native cuticle and epidermal layer of needles of Norway spruce, one of the economically most important trees in Europe. The acquired hyperspectral dataset is the basis to image the chemical heterogeneity using univariate (band integration) as well as multivariate data analysis (cluster analysis and non-negative matrix factorization).
RESULTS RESULTS
Confocal Raman microscopy probes the cuticle together with the underlying epidermis in the native state and tracks aromatics, lipids, carbohydrates and minerals with a spatial resolution of 300 nm. All three data analysis approaches distinguish a waxy, crystalline layer on top, in which aliphatic chains and coumaric acid are aligned perpendicular to the surface. Also in the lipidic amorphous cuticle beneath, strong signals of coumaric acid and flavonoids are detected. Even the unmixing algorithm results in mixed endmember spectra and confirms that lipids co-locate with aromatics. The underlying epidermal cell walls are devoid of lipids but show strong aromatic Raman bands. Especially the upper periclinal thicker cell wall is impregnated with aromatics. At the interface between epidermis and cuticle Calcium oxalate crystals are detected in a layer-like fashion. Non-negative matrix factorization gives the purest component spectra, thus the best match with reference spectra and by this promotes band assignments and interpretation of the visualized chemical heterogeneity.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Results sharpen our view about the cuticle as the outermost layer of plants and highlight the aromatic impregnation throughout. In the future, developmental studies tracking lipid and aromatic pathways might give new insights into cuticle formation and comparative studies might deepen our understanding why some trees and their needle and leaf surfaces are more resistant to biotic and abiotic stresses than others.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33557869
doi: 10.1186/s13007-021-00717-6
pii: 10.1186/s13007-021-00717-6
pmc: PMC7871409
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

17

Subventions

Organisme : Austrian Science Fund FWF
ID : Y 728
Pays : Austria
Organisme : Austrian Science Fund
ID : Y-728-B16

Références

Planta. 1999 Apr;208(2):181-7
pubmed: 10333583
Planta. 1971 Mar;98(1):1-10
pubmed: 24493303
Plant J. 2013 Jun;74(5):880-91
pubmed: 23461282
Trends Plant Sci. 2001 Jul;6(7):296
pubmed: 11474501
J Raman Spectrosc. 2020 Mar;51(3):422-431
pubmed: 32214622
J Exp Bot. 2017 Nov 9;68(19):5251-5255
pubmed: 29136457
Environ Pollut. 2006 Nov;144(1):166-71
pubmed: 16515828
Phytochemistry. 2002 Sep;61(2):205-15
pubmed: 12169316
J Agric Food Chem. 2000 Nov;48(11):5476-83
pubmed: 11087505
Front Plant Sci. 2014 Jun 13;5:274
pubmed: 24982666
Plant Physiol. 2016 Feb;170(2):921-34
pubmed: 26644508
Photochem Photobiol. 1999 Feb;69(2):177-192
pubmed: 29608029
Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2003 Aug;2(8):861-6
pubmed: 14521223
Nat Prod Commun. 2015 Jun;10(6):987-90
pubmed: 26197532
J Exp Bot. 2014 Aug;65(16):4639-51
pubmed: 25028557
Phytochemistry. 2006 Aug;67(16):1808-17
pubmed: 16497341
Plant Physiol. 2015 May;168(1):18-28
pubmed: 25783412
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2014 Mar;76:1-6
pubmed: 24445334
Planta. 2006 Oct;224(5):1141-53
pubmed: 16761135
Plant Physiol. 2016 Feb;170(2):935-46
pubmed: 26668335
Tree Physiol. 2018 Oct 1;38(10):1526-1537
pubmed: 29992254
Ann Bot. 2020 Jan 8;125(1):79-91
pubmed: 31504131
Front Chem. 2016 Feb 29;4:10
pubmed: 26973831
Am J Bot. 2009 Jul;96(7):1245-54
pubmed: 21628273
Physiol Plant. 2003 Mar;117(3):435-443
pubmed: 12654045
Plant Physiol. 2015 Jan;167(1):80-8
pubmed: 25413359
Appl Spectrosc Rev. 2017 Sep 25;53(7):517-551
pubmed: 30057488
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:963921
pubmed: 24895682
J Exp Bot. 2010;61(2):587-95
pubmed: 20007198
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2016 Apr 29;67:207-33
pubmed: 26865339
J Exp Bot. 2007;58(14):3875-83
pubmed: 17975209
New Phytol. 2020 Aug;227(3):698-713
pubmed: 32242934
Trees (Berl West). 2020;34(4):999-1008
pubmed: 32848296
New Phytol. 2007;176(2):311-6
pubmed: 17696977
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2016 Jan;113(1):82-90
pubmed: 26137889
Anal Chem. 2019 Feb 5;91(3):2472-2479
pubmed: 30624904
Chem Phys Lipids. 2006 Oct;144(1):45-59
pubmed: 16879815
Plant Methods. 2018 Jul 4;14:52
pubmed: 29997681
Plant J. 2009 Oct;60(2):378-85
pubmed: 19563439
Plant Physiol. 2013 Sep;163(1):5-20
pubmed: 23893170
Arch Pharm Res. 2009 Dec;32(12):1699-704
pubmed: 20162397
Plant Physiol. 2020 Oct;184(2):592-606
pubmed: 32788301
Microsc Microanal. 2011 Feb;17(1):118-24
pubmed: 21087546
J Exp Bot. 2001 Oct;52(363):2023-32
pubmed: 11559738
Protoplasma. 2014 Sep;251(5):1151-61
pubmed: 24627134
Plant Physiol. 2005 Sep;139(1):519-30
pubmed: 16113231
Arabidopsis Book. 2013 Dec 27;11:e0167
pubmed: 24465172
Plant Physiol. 2014 Sep;166(1):168-80
pubmed: 24913938
Integr Comp Biol. 2002 Dec;42(6):1091-9
pubmed: 21680392
Front Plant Sci. 2014 Sep 16;5:481
pubmed: 25278953
Plant Cell. 1999 Apr;11(4):751-61
pubmed: 10213791
Adv Mater. 2012 Mar 8;24(10):OP77-83
pubmed: 22290773
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Mar 31;7:427
pubmed: 27066059
J Raman Spectrosc. 2019 Jun 26;50(6):778-792
pubmed: 31263319
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2017 Feb 26;4(5):1600416
pubmed: 28546910
Tree Physiol. 2017 Jun 1;37(6):815-826
pubmed: 28369592
Planta. 2001 Aug;213(4):525-33
pubmed: 11556784
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2005;56:41-71
pubmed: 15862089
Front Plant Sci. 2014 Jun 25;5:305
pubmed: 25009549
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2003 Mar 17;1620(1-3):1-7
pubmed: 12595066
New Phytol. 2020 Nov;228(3):845-854
pubmed: 32583442
Plant Physiol. 2010 Oct;154(2):604-10
pubmed: 20709828

Auteurs

Nadia Sasani (N)

Department of Nanobiotechnology (DNBT), Institute for Biophysics, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Muthgasse 11-II, 1190, Vienna, Austria.

Peter Bock (P)

Department of Nanobiotechnology (DNBT), Institute for Biophysics, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Muthgasse 11-II, 1190, Vienna, Austria.

Martin Felhofer (M)

Department of Nanobiotechnology (DNBT), Institute for Biophysics, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Muthgasse 11-II, 1190, Vienna, Austria.

Notburga Gierlinger (N)

Department of Nanobiotechnology (DNBT), Institute for Biophysics, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Muthgasse 11-II, 1190, Vienna, Austria. burgi.gierlinger@boku.ac.at.

Classifications MeSH