Integrating rights and evidence: a technical advance in abortion guideline development.


Journal

BMJ global health
ISSN: 2059-7908
Titre abrégé: BMJ Glob Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101685275

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2021
Historique:
received: 08 10 2020
revised: 09 12 2020
accepted: 16 12 2020
entrez: 9 2 2021
pubmed: 10 2 2021
medline: 25 6 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

As part of its core work, the WHO generates, translates and disseminates knowledge, including through guideline development. In recent years, substantial work has been undertaken to revise the Evidence to Decision framework in order to fully integrate inter alia human rights. This paper describes an innovative methodological approach taken by the authors to inform law and policy recommendations for the forthcoming third edition of the Safe Abortion: Technical and Policy Guidance for Health Systems. The methodology described here effectively integrates human rights protection and enjoyment as part of health outcomes and analysis, ensuring that subsequent recommendations are consistent with international human rights standards. This will allow guideline users to make informed decisions on interventions, including legal and policy reform, to fulfil relevant human rights including the right to health.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33558339
pii: bmjgh-2020-004141
doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004141
pmc: PMC7871678
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : 001
Pays : International

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Références

BMJ. 2016 Jun 28;353:i2016
pubmed: 27353417
Allergy. 2009 May;64(5):669-77
pubmed: 19210357
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Jan 25;4(Suppl 1):e000844
pubmed: 30775012
BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919
pubmed: 27733354
Res Synth Methods. 2013 Mar;4(1):95-101
pubmed: 23795209
J Law Med Ethics. 2002 Winter;30(4):510-21
pubmed: 12561260
Implement Sci. 2018 Jan 25;13(Suppl 1):14
pubmed: 29384077
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Jan 25;4(Suppl 1):e000899
pubmed: 30775017

Auteurs

Fiona de Londras (F)

Birmingham Law School, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK f.delondras@bham.ac.uk.
College of Law, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.

Amanda Cleeve (A)

Womens and Childrens Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Consultant, UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, GE, Switzerland.

Maria Isabel Rodriguez (MI)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Antonella Lavelanet (A)

UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH