A Broad Safety Assessment of the 9-Valent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine.
Adolescent
Adult
Child
Data Mining
Databases, Factual
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
/ epidemiology
Female
Humans
Incidence
Male
Papillomaviridae
Papillomavirus Infections
/ epidemiology
Papillomavirus Vaccines
/ therapeutic use
Product Surveillance, Postmarketing
/ statistics & numerical data
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Vaccination
/ statistics & numerical data
Young Adult
data-mining
papillomavirus vaccines
vaccination
Journal
American journal of epidemiology
ISSN: 1476-6256
Titre abrégé: Am J Epidemiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7910653
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 07 2021
01 07 2021
Historique:
received:
29
09
2020
revised:
29
01
2021
accepted:
03
02
2021
pubmed:
10
2
2021
medline:
1
9
2021
entrez:
9
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Parents indicate that safety is their top concern about human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination. A data-mining method not requiring prespecification of health outcome(s) or postexposure period(s) of potentially increased risk can be used to identify possible associations between an exposure and any of thousands of medically attended health outcomes; this method was applied to data on the 9-valent HPV vaccine (HPV9) to detect potential safety problems. Data on 9- to 26-year-olds who had received HPV9 vaccine between November 4, 2016, and August 5, 2018, inclusive, were extracted from the MarketScan database and analyzed for statistically significant clustering of incident diagnoses within the hierarchy of diagnoses coded using the International Classification of Diseases and temporally within the 1 year after vaccination, using the self-controlled tree-temporal scan statistic and TreeScan software. Only 56 days of postvaccination enrollment was required; subsequent follow-up was censored at disenrollment. Multiple testing was adjusted for. The analysis included 493,089 doses of HPV9. Almost all signals resulted from temporal confounding, not unexpected with a 1-year follow-up period. The only plausible signals were for nonspecific adverse events (e.g., injection-site reactions, headache) on days 1-2 after vaccination, with attributable risks as low as 1 per 100,000 vaccinees. Considering the broad scope of the evaluation and the high statistical power, the findings of no specific serious adverse events should provide reassurance about this vaccine's safety.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33558897
pii: 6131430
doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab022
pmc: PMC8245868
doi:
Substances chimiques
Papillomavirus Vaccines
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1253-1259Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Références
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019 Aug 23;68(33):718-723
pubmed: 31437143
Vaccine. 2016 Jan 2;34(1):172-8
pubmed: 26549364
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 May;22(5):517-23
pubmed: 23512870
Vaccine. 2015 May 21;33(22):2602-5
pubmed: 25882168
Am J Epidemiol. 2018 Jun 1;187(6):1269-1276
pubmed: 29860470
Vaccine. 2017 Jul 24;35(33):4203-4212
pubmed: 28648542
J Adolesc Health. 2020 Aug;67(2):253-261
pubmed: 32199723
Intern Med. 2014;53(19):2185-200
pubmed: 25274229
Pharmaceutics. 2013 Mar 14;5(1):179-200
pubmed: 24300404
JAMA. 2015 Jan 6;313(1):54-61
pubmed: 25562266
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018 Apr;27(4):391-397
pubmed: 29446176
Biometrics. 2003 Jun;59(2):323-31
pubmed: 12926717
Vaccine. 2017 Aug 24;35(36):4761-4768
pubmed: 28750853
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019;15(7-8):1745-1751
pubmed: 30951396
J Autoimmun. 2017 May;79:84-90
pubmed: 28190705
J Adolesc Health. 2018 Nov;63(5):652-656
pubmed: 30348283
Vaccine. 2016 Jan 2;34(1):167-71
pubmed: 26549361
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Feb;25(2):274-81
pubmed: 26677211