Ultrasonographic features of uterine cervical lesions.
Abortion, Spontaneous
/ diagnostic imaging
Adolescent
Adult
Carcinoma
/ diagnostic imaging
Cervix Uteri
/ abnormalities
Child
Endometriosis
/ diagnostic imaging
Female
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Middle Aged
Polyps
/ diagnostic imaging
Pregnancy
Pregnancy, Ectopic
/ diagnostic imaging
Ultrasonography
/ methods
Uterine Artery
/ diagnostic imaging
Uterine Cervical Diseases
/ diagnostic imaging
Uterine Cervical Incompetence
/ diagnostic imaging
Uterine Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Journal
The British journal of radiology
ISSN: 1748-880X
Titre abrégé: Br J Radiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0373125
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 May 2021
01 May 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
10
2
2021
medline:
1
5
2021
entrez:
9
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Currently, ultrasound (US) is a valuable imaging tool for the initial assessment and evaluation of the female genital organs, uterus, and adnexa. However, it is easy to overlook the uterine cervix while conducting a pelvic US. Uterine cervical lesions may range from benign to malignant in nature. Therefore, meticulous examination with US may play a key role in assessing uterine cervical lesions. Although there is substantial overlap in the US findings across various uterine cervical lesions, some US features, in tandem with clinical characteristics, may suggest a specific diagnosis. Familiarity with the clinical settings and US characteristics of different uterine cervical lesions can support prompt and accurate diagnosis of suspicious lesions. This review article aims to describe the features of US and possible values for distinction of these lesions in the uterine cervix.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33560888
doi: 10.1259/bjr.20201242
pmc: PMC8506186
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20201242Références
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Oct;34(4):462-70
pubmed: 19685552
Dis Markers. 2015;2015:679730
pubmed: 25972623
Radiographics. 2016 Mar-Apr;36(2):596-617
pubmed: 26963464
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2014 Oct;64(5):311-6
pubmed: 25368452
Jpn J Radiol. 2017 Sep;35(9):485-494
pubmed: 28608002
Eur J Radiol. 2012 Aug;81(8):e888-92
pubmed: 22717123
Acad Radiol. 2007 Feb;14(2):193-200
pubmed: 17236992
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Oct;36(4):512-6
pubmed: 20336641
Insights Imaging. 2010 Nov;1(5-6):309-328
pubmed: 22347925
Radiographics. 2003 Mar-Apr;23(2):425-45; quiz 534-5
pubmed: 12640157
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Aug;195(2):517-23
pubmed: 20651212
Acta Radiol. 2013 Feb 1;54(1):113-20
pubmed: 23081960
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Mar;19(3):297-301
pubmed: 11896956
J Ultrasound Med. 2014 Apr;33(4):667-71
pubmed: 24658946
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Dec;38(6):716-21
pubmed: 21919103
J Clin Ultrasound. 1984 Nov-Dec;12(9):553-7
pubmed: 6439749
J Hum Reprod Sci. 2013 Oct;6(4):273-6
pubmed: 24672169
Radiographics. 2012 Oct;32(6):1575-97
pubmed: 23065159
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;46(4):405-13
pubmed: 26011665
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Nov;205(5):452.e1-5
pubmed: 21890095
Radiol Clin North Am. 2014 Nov;52(6):1237-52
pubmed: 25444103
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Feb;188(2):586-96
pubmed: 12592276
Radiology. 2004 Oct;233(1):19-34
pubmed: 15317956