Observational Study on Lameness Recovery in 10 Dogs Affected by Iliopsoas Injury and Submitted to a Physiotherapeutic Approach.
border collies
dog
iliopsoas muscle
muscle injury
rehabilitation
Journal
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Feb 2021
06 Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
11
01
2021
revised:
30
01
2021
accepted:
01
02
2021
entrez:
10
2
2021
pubmed:
11
2
2021
medline:
11
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This preliminary study has investigated the outcome of physiotherapy in 10 dogs affected by a primary lesion of the iliopsoas muscle and the potential effects of sex, age, and breed on recovery. Ten dogs with primary injury of the iliopsoas muscle were retrospectively included in this study. Dogs were submitted to a rehabilitation program, characterized by a multimodal approach, including physical therapies and modalities. After recovery, patients were submitted to a further support period of rehabilitation to promote muscle strengthening and limit injury recurrence during their return to normal functional and sports activity. Border collies were highly represented. The recovery of lameness occurred after a mean of 22.6 ± 14.7 (median 18) days with a median number of five sessions. None of the examined variables affected the recovery time, except for the border collie breed, which showed a significantly faster recovery time; however, there was no difference between the breeds with regard to the number of sessions. Multimodal rehabilitation therapy may promote lameness recovery of mild-to-moderate iliopsoas lesions within 3 weeks. This preliminary study reports a clinical approach and recovery of primary iliopsoas lesions, findings that can provide clinicians with useful prognostic information for dogs involved in sports activities.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33562039
pii: ani11020419
doi: 10.3390/ani11020419
pmc: PMC7914594
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Vet Surg. 2009 Dec;38(8):946-53
pubmed: 20017852
Phys Ther Sport. 2018 Jul;32:227-234
pubmed: 29870922
Indian J Exp Biol. 1990 Aug;28(8):766-70
pubmed: 2253971
Vet Surg. 2020 Jan;49(1):80-87
pubmed: 31390083
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2008 Jul-Aug;49(4):378-82
pubmed: 18720772
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2013 Oct 1;243(7):1010-8
pubmed: 24050568
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2009;22(3):243-8
pubmed: 19448873
Br J Sports Med. 2016 Mar;50(5):305-10
pubmed: 26888072
Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2017 May;47(3):555-568
pubmed: 28069288
Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2005 Nov;35(6):1427-39, ix
pubmed: 16260320
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006 Apr;14(4):195-204
pubmed: 16585361
Vet Rec. 2016 Oct 15;179(15):385
pubmed: 27444781
Compend Contin Educ Vet. 2013 May;35(5):E2
pubmed: 23677782
Am J Sports Med. 2005 May;33(5):745-64
pubmed: 15851777
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2009;22(3):238-42
pubmed: 19448867
Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2016 May;46(3):373-420, v
pubmed: 27068444
Skeletal Radiol. 1996 Jan;25(1):3-11
pubmed: 8717112
Front Vet Sci. 2016 May 12;3:34
pubmed: 27243022
Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2016 May;46(3):421-51, v
pubmed: 26928749
Vet Surg. 2020 Jan;49(1):22-32
pubmed: 31271225
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2009;22(4):321-4
pubmed: 19597633
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002 Oct;(403 Suppl):S81-9
pubmed: 12394456
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1997 Jun 1;210(11):1631-4
pubmed: 9170092
Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2015 Jan;45(1):91-121
pubmed: 25432683
Aust Vet J. 2011 Apr;89(4):117-21
pubmed: 21418166
J Phys Ther Sci. 2018 May;30(5):719-725
pubmed: 29765189
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. 2005;18(4):247-53
pubmed: 16594394
Animal. 2015 Dec;9(12):1921-8
pubmed: 26245492
Vet Surg. 2006 Feb;35(2):186-90
pubmed: 16472299
Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2004 Sep-Oct;45(5):388-92
pubmed: 15487562
Front Vet Sci. 2019 Jun 12;6:185
pubmed: 31249835