Generalized joint hypermobility, scoliosis, patellofemoral pain, and physical abilities in young dancers.
Generalized joint hypermobility
PFP
Postural balance
Scoliosis
Strength ability
Journal
BMC musculoskeletal disorders
ISSN: 1471-2474
Titre abrégé: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968565
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Feb 2021
09 Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
17
03
2020
accepted:
27
01
2021
entrez:
10
2
2021
pubmed:
11
2
2021
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Many young girls with generalized joint hypermobility (GJH) choose to participate in dance because their bodies are suited for this activity. Scoliosis tends to occur often in thin girls, who also are more likely to choose dance. Both anomalies (GJH and scoliosis) may be related to reduced abilities such as diminished strength and insufficient postural balance, with increased risk for musculoskeletal conditions. The main objectives of the present study were to determine the prevalence of dancers with GJH, the prevalence of dancers with scoliosis, and the prevalence of dancers with these two anomalies; and, to determine differences in physical abilities and the presence of patellofemoral pain (PFP) between young female dancers with and without such anomalies. One hundred thirty-two female dancers, aged 12-14 years, were assessed for anthropometric parameters, GJH, scoliosis, knee muscle strength, postural balance, proprioception ability, and PFP. GJH was identified in 54 dancers (40.9%) and scoliosis in 38 dancers (28.8%). Significant differences were found in the proportion of dancers with no anomalies (74 dancers, 56.1%) and dancers with both anomalies (34 dancers, 25.8%) (p < .001). Dancers with both anomalies had reduced dynamic postural balance in the anterior direction (p = .023), reduced proprioception ability (p < .001), and weaker knee extensors (p = .036) and flexors (p = .040) compared with dancers with no anomalies. Among dancers with both anomalies, 73.5% suffered bilateral PFP, 17.6% suffered unilateral PFP, and 8.8% had no PFP (p < .001). A high prevalence of young girls participating in dance classes had GJH, as the increased joint flexibility probably provides them with some esthetic advantages. The high prevalence of scoliosis found in these young dancers might be attributed to their relatively low body mass, their delayed maturation, and the selection process of dancers. Dancers with both GJH and scoliosis had decreased muscle strength, reduced postural balance, reduced proprioception, with higher risk of PFP. The main clinical implications are the need to reduce the risk of PFP among dancers by developing appropriate strength and stabilizing exercises combined with proprioceptive and postural balance training, to improve the correct alignment of the hyperextended and hypermobile joints, and to improve their supporting muscle strength.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Many young girls with generalized joint hypermobility (GJH) choose to participate in dance because their bodies are suited for this activity. Scoliosis tends to occur often in thin girls, who also are more likely to choose dance. Both anomalies (GJH and scoliosis) may be related to reduced abilities such as diminished strength and insufficient postural balance, with increased risk for musculoskeletal conditions. The main objectives of the present study were to determine the prevalence of dancers with GJH, the prevalence of dancers with scoliosis, and the prevalence of dancers with these two anomalies; and, to determine differences in physical abilities and the presence of patellofemoral pain (PFP) between young female dancers with and without such anomalies.
METHODS
METHODS
One hundred thirty-two female dancers, aged 12-14 years, were assessed for anthropometric parameters, GJH, scoliosis, knee muscle strength, postural balance, proprioception ability, and PFP.
RESULTS
RESULTS
GJH was identified in 54 dancers (40.9%) and scoliosis in 38 dancers (28.8%). Significant differences were found in the proportion of dancers with no anomalies (74 dancers, 56.1%) and dancers with both anomalies (34 dancers, 25.8%) (p < .001). Dancers with both anomalies had reduced dynamic postural balance in the anterior direction (p = .023), reduced proprioception ability (p < .001), and weaker knee extensors (p = .036) and flexors (p = .040) compared with dancers with no anomalies. Among dancers with both anomalies, 73.5% suffered bilateral PFP, 17.6% suffered unilateral PFP, and 8.8% had no PFP (p < .001).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
A high prevalence of young girls participating in dance classes had GJH, as the increased joint flexibility probably provides them with some esthetic advantages. The high prevalence of scoliosis found in these young dancers might be attributed to their relatively low body mass, their delayed maturation, and the selection process of dancers. Dancers with both GJH and scoliosis had decreased muscle strength, reduced postural balance, reduced proprioception, with higher risk of PFP. The main clinical implications are the need to reduce the risk of PFP among dancers by developing appropriate strength and stabilizing exercises combined with proprioceptive and postural balance training, to improve the correct alignment of the hyperextended and hypermobile joints, and to improve their supporting muscle strength.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33563260
doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04023-z
pii: 10.1186/s12891-021-04023-z
pmc: PMC7874653
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
161Références
J Dance Med Sci. 2008;12(3):99-108
pubmed: 19618585
Clin Rheumatol. 2013 Apr;32(4):455-61
pubmed: 23417425
BMJ. 2013 Apr 30;346:f2508
pubmed: 23633006
Clin Neurophysiol. 2019 Oct;130(10):1752-1761
pubmed: 31401484
Br J Sports Med. 2003 Apr;37(2):170-4; discussion 175
pubmed: 12663362
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005 Jun;44(6):744-50
pubmed: 15728418
Clin Rheumatol. 2013 Apr;32(4):425-34
pubmed: 23572035
J Dance Med Sci. 2010;14(3):82-8
pubmed: 21067685
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2006 Apr;20(2):329-51
pubmed: 16546060
Int J Sports Med. 2011 Jul;32(7):485-9
pubmed: 21695667
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Sep;95(9):1725-30
pubmed: 24662812
J Clin Rheumatol. 2016 Jun;22(4):171-8
pubmed: 27219302
Br J Sports Med. 2006 Apr;40(4):299-303; discussion 303
pubmed: 16556782
Eur J Sport Sci. 2020 Jul;20(6):845-857
pubmed: 31573838
Phys Sportsmed. 2010 Jun;38(2):165-70
pubmed: 20631476
J Exerc Rehabil. 2017 Apr 30;13(2):244-249
pubmed: 28503541
Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Apr;56(4):1212-8
pubmed: 17393450
Br Foreign Med Chir Rev. 1865 Oct;36(72):367-372
pubmed: 30164124
Res Sports Med. 2017 Apr-Jun;25(2):166-180
pubmed: 28140673
Rheumatol Int. 2015 Apr;35(4):741-7
pubmed: 25218649
Phys Sportsmed. 2018 Feb;46(1):48-55
pubmed: 28994332
Am J Sports Med. 2009 Nov;37(11):2187-93
pubmed: 19561176
Am J Sports Med. 2010 Jul;38(7):1487-97
pubmed: 20601606
BMC Neurosci. 2006 Oct 19;7:68
pubmed: 17052338
Scoliosis. 2011 Oct 07;6:22
pubmed: 21981906
J Sports Sci. 2019 Aug;37(15):1690-1698
pubmed: 30929582
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009 Dec;48(12):1613-4
pubmed: 19589896
Lancet. 2008 May 3;371(9623):1527-37
pubmed: 18456103
Am J Hum Biol. 2008 May-Jun;20(3):299-307
pubmed: 18203124
J Athl Train. 2012 Jul-Aug;47(4):366-71
pubmed: 22889651
N Engl J Med. 1986 May 22;314(21):1348-53
pubmed: 3451741
J Sports Sci. 1999 Sep;17(9):743-50
pubmed: 10521005
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Sep 15;33(20):2160-5
pubmed: 18794756
Phys Ther Sport. 2013 Nov;14(4):213-20
pubmed: 23146194
J Rheumatol. 2004 Jan;31(1):173-8
pubmed: 14705238
J Sport Rehabil. 2019 Aug 1;28(6):584-592
pubmed: 30040016
Am J Sports Med. 1992 May-Jun;20(3):267-73
pubmed: 1636856
Asian Spine J. 2018 Apr;12(2):349-355
pubmed: 29713418
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Aug;86(8):1601-8
pubmed: 15292405
Nutr Rev. 1981 Feb;39(2):43-55
pubmed: 7010232
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1997 Aug;26(2):60-8
pubmed: 9243403
Am J Sports Med. 2008 Sep;36(9):1779-88
pubmed: 18753681
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000 Mar;(372):74-84
pubmed: 10738417
J Orthop Res. 2002 Jan;20(1):101-7
pubmed: 11853076
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 May 17;11:93
pubmed: 20478013
Ann Rheum Dis. 1990 Mar;49(3):199-200
pubmed: 2181948
Am J Sports Med. 2008 Jun;36(6):1073-80
pubmed: 18326833
Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2018 Sep 3;13:19
pubmed: 30186976
Scoliosis. 2011 Jan 20;6(1):1
pubmed: 21251310
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Jul 21;15:243
pubmed: 25042838
Rheumatol Int. 2005 May;25(4):260-3
pubmed: 14745505
Am J Sports Med. 2006 Mar;34(3):445-55
pubmed: 16282579
Res Sports Med. 2018 Jul-Sep;26(3):289-305
pubmed: 29519163
J Rheumatol. 2007 Apr;34(4):804-9
pubmed: 17407233
Disabil Rehabil. 2017 Jul;39(14):1391-1397
pubmed: 27339264
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008 Mar;38(3):126-36
pubmed: 18383646
J Sports Sci. 2020 Apr;38(7):719-730
pubmed: 32046623
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988 May;70(3):420-2
pubmed: 3372564
Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2017 Mar;175(1):148-157
pubmed: 28145606
Int J Sports Med. 2013 Feb;34(2):138-43
pubmed: 22960991
J Athl Train. 2009 Jan-Feb;44(1):26-32
pubmed: 19180215
Eur Spine J. 2017 Jun;26(6):1638-1644
pubmed: 27844226
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2019 Nov 10;5(1):e000620
pubmed: 31798951