Modernizing Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria: Recommendations of the ASCO-Friends of Cancer Research Prior Therapies Work Group.
Journal
Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research
ISSN: 1557-3265
Titre abrégé: Clin Cancer Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9502500
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 05 2021
01 05 2021
Historique:
received:
28
09
2020
revised:
25
11
2020
accepted:
29
12
2020
pubmed:
11
2
2021
medline:
17
3
2022
entrez:
10
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Restrictive eligibility criteria induce differences between clinical trial and "real-world" treatment populations. Restrictions based on prior therapies are common; minimizing them when appropriate may increase patient participation in clinical trials. A multi-stakeholder working group developed a conceptual framework to guide evaluation of prevailing practices with respect to using prior treatment as selection criteria for clinical trials. The working group made recommendations to minimize restrictions based on prior therapies within the boundaries of scientific validity, patient centeredness, distributive justice, and beneficence. (i) Patients are eligible for clinical trials regardless of the number or type of prior therapies and without requiring a specific therapy prior to enrollment unless a scientific or clinically based rationale is provided as justification. (ii) Prior therapy (either limits on number and type of prior therapies or requirements for specific therapies before enrollment) could be used to determine eligibility in the following cases: a) the agents being studied target a specific mechanism or pathway that could potentially interact with a prior therapy; b) the study design requires that all patients begin protocol-specified treatment at the same point in the disease trajectory; and c) in randomized clinical studies, if the therapy in the control arm is not appropriate for the patient due to previous therapies received. (iii) Trial designers should consider conducting evaluation separately from the primary endpoint analysis for participants who have received prior therapies. Clinical trial sponsors and regulators should thoughtfully reexamine the use of prior therapy exposure as selection criteria to maximize clinical trial participation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33563637
pii: 1078-0432.CCR-20-3854
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-3854
pmc: PMC8170959
mid: NIHMS1660459
doi:
Types de publication
Letter
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2408-2415Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG1 CA189873
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.
Références
Mol Cancer Res. 2018 Feb;16(2):269-278
pubmed: 29133589
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov 20;35(33):3737-3744
pubmed: 28968170
Cancer Treat Rev. 2019 May;75:39-51
pubmed: 30954906
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2019 Jan;39:e8-e21
pubmed: 31099662
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov 20;35(33):3745-3752
pubmed: 28968168
N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 22;378(8):731-739
pubmed: 29466156
Clin Cancer Res. 2002 Apr;8(4):935-8
pubmed: 11948095
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov 20;35(33):3753-3759
pubmed: 28968172
Lancet Oncol. 2014 Sep;15(10):1119-28
pubmed: 25153538
Cancer Lett. 2017 Feb 28;387:121-126
pubmed: 26987624
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Dec;19(12):1654-1667
pubmed: 30413378
N Engl J Med. 2016 May 26;374(21):2001-3
pubmed: 27074059
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Apr 20;35(12):1288-1296
pubmed: 28221867
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Nov 15;22(22):5527-5538
pubmed: 27780853
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2509-20
pubmed: 26028255
Cancer Sci. 2019 Apr;110(4):1401-1407
pubmed: 30776174
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov 20;35(33):3774-3780
pubmed: 28968173
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 11;378(2):113-125
pubmed: 29151359
Oncologist. 2013;18(2):232-8
pubmed: 23363807
Nat Rev Cancer. 2017 Oct 25;17(11):637-658
pubmed: 29068003
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2006 Jul;62(1):15-26
pubmed: 16842375
J Thorac Oncol. 2018 Oct;13(10):1530-1538
pubmed: 29935304
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018 Nov;15(11):694-708
pubmed: 30108370
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov 20;35(33):3760-3773
pubmed: 28968165
Oncology. 2016;91(4):177-178
pubmed: 27560780
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Jan;140(1):161-6
pubmed: 26586415
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Feb 1;111(2):118-128
pubmed: 30561713
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Sep 15;107(11):
pubmed: 26378224
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 22;379(21):2027-2039
pubmed: 30280657
Ann Oncol. 2015 Dec;26(12):2464-9
pubmed: 26410619
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2017 Mar;51(2):190-199
pubmed: 30231727
N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 16;376(7):629-640
pubmed: 27959700
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Apr 1;36(10):1020-1044
pubmed: 29380678
Cancer. 2013 Feb 1;119(3):471-2
pubmed: 23341304
Cancer Treat Rev. 2018 May;66:82-94
pubmed: 29729495
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov 20;35(33):3781-3787
pubmed: 28968169