A proposal for a new classification of coracobrachialis muscle morphology.
Coracobrachialis muscle
Median nerve
Musculocutaneous nerve
New classification
Journal
Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA
ISSN: 1279-8517
Titre abrégé: Surg Radiol Anat
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8608029
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2021
May 2021
Historique:
received:
13
11
2020
accepted:
27
01
2021
pubmed:
11
2
2021
medline:
8
9
2021
entrez:
10
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The coracobrachialis muscle (CRM) originates from the apex of the coracoid process, in common with the short head of the biceps brachii muscle, and from the intermuscular septum. It inserts to the medial part of the humerus between the attachment of the medial head of the triceps brachii and the brachial muscle. Both the proximal and distal attachments of the CRM, as well as its relationship with the musculocutaneus nerve, demonstrate morphological variability. One hundred and one upper limbs (52 left, and 49 right) fixed in 10% formalin solution were examined. Three main types, with subtypes, were identified. The most common was Type I (49.5), characterized by a single muscle belly with a classical origin from the coracoid process, medially and posteriorly to the tendon of the biceps brachii. Type II (42.6%), characterized by two heads, was divided into two subtypes (A-B) depending on its origin: Type IIA, where one head originated from the coracoid process posteriorly to the tendon of the biceps brachii and the second head from the short head of the biceps brachii, and Type IIB, in which both heads originated from the coracoid process; however, the superficial head fused with the insertion of a short head of the biceps brachii, while the deep head was directly originating. Finally, Type III (7.9%) was characterized by three heads: two originated from the coracoid process (superficial and deep), and the third from a short head of the biceps brachii. Two types of insertion and two types of musculocutaneous nerve (MCN) relative to CRM could be distinguished. An adapted classification is needed for all clinicians working in this area, as well as for anatomists. The CRM demonstrates morphological variability in both its proximal and distal attachments, as well as the variable course of the MCN relative to the CRM. WHAT IS KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT "AND" WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE: Not much is known about the variability of coracobrachialis muscle. The present paper introduces a completely new classification, both clinical and anatomical.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33564931
doi: 10.1007/s00276-021-02700-1
pii: 10.1007/s00276-021-02700-1
pmc: PMC8105249
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
679-688Références
Cureus. 2017 Jul 13;9(7):e1466
pubmed: 28936378
Anat Sci Int. 2019 Jan;94(1):53-57
pubmed: 29987440
Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2018;77(4):785-788
pubmed: 29651792
Cureus. 2018 May 13;10(5):e2615
pubmed: 30027007
Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2001 Aug;60(3):217-24
pubmed: 11552663
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Dec 19;18(1):539
pubmed: 29258498
Anesth Analg. 2010 Jun 1;110(6):1729-34
pubmed: 20435937
Clin Anat. 2004 Mar;17(2):139-43
pubmed: 14974102
Surg Radiol Anat. 2016 Apr;38(3):335-40
pubmed: 26464302
Kaibogaku Zasshi. 1989 Feb;64(1):18-35
pubmed: 2508409
Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2004 Nov;63(4):503-6
pubmed: 15712151
J Biomech. 1990;23(5):405-15
pubmed: 2373713
Int Orthop. 1993;17(4):232-4
pubmed: 8407039
Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn. 1964 Oct;40:195-300
pubmed: 14213705
Skeletal Radiol. 2015 Sep;44(9):1273-8
pubmed: 25924580
Ann Anat. 2019 May;223:85-89
pubmed: 30797975
J Foot Ankle Res. 2019 Feb 1;12:9
pubmed: 30733832
Clin Anat. 2001 Sep;14(5):379-82
pubmed: 11754228
Clin Anat. 2019 May;32(4):557-565
pubmed: 30758860
Surg Radiol Anat. 2003 Feb;24(6):406-10
pubmed: 12652369
Ann Anat. 2017 Jan;209:45-50
pubmed: 27765675
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2002 Jan;12(2):96-8
pubmed: 24570160
Surg Radiol Anat. 2021 May;43(5):661-669
pubmed: 32979058
Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2017;76(4):762-765
pubmed: 28353299
Surg Radiol Anat. 2021 Jan;43(1):19-25
pubmed: 32656573
Am J Sports Med. 2002 Sep-Oct;30(5):758-67
pubmed: 12239016
Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2005 May;64(2):101-8
pubmed: 16121328
Int J Shoulder Surg. 2015 Apr-Jun;9(2):52-5
pubmed: 25937715
Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2020 Aug 26;:
pubmed: 32844391
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 May;22(5):687-94
pubmed: 22981356
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Nov;23(11):1624-30
pubmed: 25017313
Anat Sci Int. 2018 Mar;93(2):299-306
pubmed: 28849397
Ann Anat. 2019 Jul;224:47-53
pubmed: 30930196
Clin Anat. 1998;11(5):327-31
pubmed: 9725577
Ann Anat. 2020 Sep;231:151506
pubmed: 32173563
Biomed Res Int. 2018 May 31;2018:9623579
pubmed: 29955614
Ann Anat. 2019 Mar;222:1-11
pubmed: 30408521
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Jul;(244):166-71
pubmed: 2743658