Perioperative Cryoprecipitate Waste Reduction.
Blood transfusion
Operating Room efficiency
Quality improvement
Waste Reduction
Journal
Journal of medical systems
ISSN: 1573-689X
Titre abrégé: J Med Syst
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7806056
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Feb 2021
10 Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
07
12
2020
accepted:
01
02
2021
entrez:
10
2
2021
pubmed:
11
2
2021
medline:
29
7
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Improvement of operating room efficiency regarding perioperative blood product transfusion is fundamental for surgical patients. The aim of this study was to 1) assess the use of cryoprecipitate in the operating room at our institution 2) identify and address gaps in knowledge regarding the process of ordering and returning cryoprecipitate 3) aim to reduce cryoprecipitate wastage by 50% over a 14-month period. Institutional data from Dec. 2017 to April 2020 was retrieved on cryoprecipitate that was ordered, thawed, and delivered to the operating room. Additionally, data was collected regarding cryoprecipitate that was wasted. A retrospective analysis of weekly intraoperative cryoprecipitate utilization was performed to compare wastage before and after implementation of interventions. Pre-intervention (Dec 2017 - March 2019), a total of 453 units of cryoprecipitate were issued with 14 units wasted (3% wastage). Between March 2019 and April 2020, the 14 months after our intervention, there were 402 units of cryoprecipitate issued with only 1 unit wasted (0.25% wastage). The overall cryoprecipitate waste rate was reduced by 91.66%. Month-to-month comparison of pre-intervention and post-intervention data identified significant reduction in average monthly wastage (0.875 vs 0.071 units respectively, p < 0.05). Appropriately, there was not a significant change in the mean monthly cryoprecipitate issued to the operating room (28.31 vs. 28.7 units, p = 0.94). These results demonstrate that utilizing educational initiatives for optimization of blood product management can reduce unnecessary ordering, transfusions, and wastage; an outcome that could ultimately reduce costs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33566170
doi: 10.1007/s10916-021-01719-6
pii: 10.1007/s10916-021-01719-6
pmc: PMC7873515
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
37Références
Intern Med J. 2013 Aug;43(8):896-902
pubmed: 23425520
Br J Anaesth. 2012 Aug;109(2):135-7
pubmed: 22782975
Transfusion. 2018 Feb;58(2):541-542
pubmed: 29411395
N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 12;377(15):1485-1488
pubmed: 29020590
Anesthesiology. 2015 Feb;122(2):241-75
pubmed: 25545654
Br J Haematol. 2017 Oct;179(1):131-141
pubmed: 28653339
Transfusion. 2017 Jun;57 Suppl 2:1588-1598
pubmed: 28591469
Transfus Med. 2012 Oct;22(5):315-20
pubmed: 22994448
Anesth Analg. 2012 Feb;114(2):261-74
pubmed: 21965371
Br J Anaesth. 2014 Dec;113(6):922-34
pubmed: 24972790
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2011;9(1):29-37
pubmed: 21174480
Br J Anaesth. 2010 Aug;105(2):116-21
pubmed: 20627882
Transfusion. 2020 Mar;60 Suppl 2:S1-S9
pubmed: 32086817
Transfusion. 2016 Sep;56(9):2184-92
pubmed: 27174734
Blood Adv. 2018 Oct 9;2(19):2433-2442
pubmed: 30266818
Blood Rev. 2019 Nov;38:100593
pubmed: 31405535
Immunohematology. 1996;12(2):87-9
pubmed: 15387748
Injury. 2017 May;48(5):1074-1081
pubmed: 28190583
Br J Haematol. 1987 Nov;67(3):365-8
pubmed: 3689699