Impact of Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Survival of Patients with Advanced Residual Disease at Radical Cystectomy following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

adjuvant chemotherapy muscle-invasive bladder cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Journal

Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Feb 2021
Historique:
received: 19 12 2020
revised: 18 01 2021
accepted: 02 02 2021
entrez: 11 2 2021
pubmed: 12 2 2021
medline: 12 2 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy (RC) with pelvic lymph-node dissection is the standard treatment for cT2-4a cN0 cM0 muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Despite the significant improvement of primary-tumor downstaging with NAC, up to 50% of patients are eventually found to have advanced residual disease (pT3-T4 and/or histopathologically confirmed nodal metastases (pN+)) at RC. Currently, there is no established standard of care in such cases. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess differences in survival rates between patients with pT3-T4 and/or pN+ MIBC who received NAC and surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), and patients without AC. A systematic search was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement using the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. The last search was performed on 12 November 2020. The primary end point was overall survival (OS) and the secondary end point was disease-specific survival (DSS). We identified 2124 articles, of which 6 were selected for qualitative and quantitative analyses. Of a total of 3096 participants in the included articles, 2355 (76.1%) were in the surveillance group and 741 (23.9%) received AC. The use of AC was associated with significantly better OS (hazard ratio (HR) 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75-0.94; The administration of AC in patients with MIBC and pT3-T4 residual disease after NAC might have a positive impact on OS and DSS. However, this may not apply to N+ patients.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy (RC) with pelvic lymph-node dissection is the standard treatment for cT2-4a cN0 cM0 muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Despite the significant improvement of primary-tumor downstaging with NAC, up to 50% of patients are eventually found to have advanced residual disease (pT3-T4 and/or histopathologically confirmed nodal metastases (pN+)) at RC. Currently, there is no established standard of care in such cases. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess differences in survival rates between patients with pT3-T4 and/or pN+ MIBC who received NAC and surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), and patients without AC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS METHODS
A systematic search was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement using the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. The last search was performed on 12 November 2020. The primary end point was overall survival (OS) and the secondary end point was disease-specific survival (DSS).
RESULTS RESULTS
We identified 2124 articles, of which 6 were selected for qualitative and quantitative analyses. Of a total of 3096 participants in the included articles, 2355 (76.1%) were in the surveillance group and 741 (23.9%) received AC. The use of AC was associated with significantly better OS (hazard ratio (HR) 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75-0.94;
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The administration of AC in patients with MIBC and pT3-T4 residual disease after NAC might have a positive impact on OS and DSS. However, this may not apply to N+ patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33567656
pii: jcm10040651
doi: 10.3390/jcm10040651
pmc: PMC7915645
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Références

Bladder Cancer. 2017 Jul 27;3(3):181-189
pubmed: 28824946
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097
pubmed: 19621072
BJU Int. 2014 Jul;114(1):67-74
pubmed: 24053889
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Feb 1;4(2):225-229
pubmed: 28837718
Oncologist. 2016 Jun;21(6):708-15
pubmed: 27053504
Urology. 2009 Jan;73(1):147-52
pubmed: 18848348
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;35(19):2117-2124
pubmed: 28375787
Eur Urol. 2017 Mar;71(3):462-475
pubmed: 27375033
Psychol Health Med. 2020 Feb;25(2):190-200
pubmed: 31698952
BJU Int. 2009 Dec;104(11):1646-9
pubmed: 19466944
Eur Urol. 2014 Jul;66(1):42-54
pubmed: 24018020
World J Urol. 2016 Nov;34(11):1567-1573
pubmed: 27072536
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Oct 15;19(20):4005-13
pubmed: 11600601
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Mar 10;34(8):825-32
pubmed: 26786930
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 Jul 22;:
pubmed: 28818551
Eur Urol Oncol. 2020 Oct;3(5):671-679
pubmed: 31411990

Auteurs

Wojciech Krajewski (W)

Department of Urology and Oncologic Urology, Wrocław Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.

Łukasz Nowak (Ł)

Department of Urology and Oncologic Urology, Wrocław Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.

Marco Moschini (M)

Klinik für Urologie, Luzerner Kantonsspital, 6004 Lucerne, Switzerland.

Sławomir Poletajew (S)

Second Department of Urology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 01-813 Warsaw, Poland.

Joanna Chorbińska (J)

Department of Urology and Oncologic Urology, Wrocław Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.

Andrea Necchi (A)

Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy.

Francesco Montorsi (F)

Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy.

Alberto Briganti (A)

Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy.

Rafael Sanchez-Salas (R)

Department of Urology, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris-Descartes, 75014 Paris, France.

Shahrokh F Shariat (SF)

Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Departments of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119146 Moscow, Russia.
Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan.
European Association of Urology Research Foundation, 6803 AA Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine and Hospital Motol, Charles University, 15006 Prague, Czech Republic.

Juan Palou (J)

Fundació Puigvert, Department of Urology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, 08025 Barcelona, Spain.

Marek Babjuk (M)

Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine and Hospital Motol, Charles University, 15006 Prague, Czech Republic.

Jeremy Yc Teoh (JY)

S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

Francesco Soria (F)

Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, 10124 Turin, Italy.

Benjamin Pradere (B)

Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Department of Oncology and Urology, University Hospital of Tours, 37000 Tours, France.

Paola Irene Ornaghi (PI)

Klinik für Urologie, Luzerner Kantonsspital, 6004 Lucerne, Switzerland.

Aleksandra Pawlak (A)

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 50-375 Wrocław, Poland.

Janusz Dembowski (J)

Department of Urology and Oncologic Urology, Wrocław Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.

Romuald Zdrojowy (R)

Department of Urology and Oncologic Urology, Wrocław Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.

Classifications MeSH