Problems and Needs Persist for Oklahoma City Bombing Survivors Many Years Later.

disaster mental health long term mental health posttraumatic growth posttraumatic stress resilience terrorism trauma

Journal

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2076-328X
Titre abrégé: Behav Sci (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101576826

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 Jan 2021
Historique:
received: 03 01 2021
revised: 21 01 2021
accepted: 23 01 2021
entrez: 12 2 2021
pubmed: 13 2 2021
medline: 13 2 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This study assesses long-term physical and emotional symptoms and unmet needs in direct survivors of the 1995 Oklahoma City terrorist bombing 18 ½ years after the event. A telephone questionnaire assessed psychiatric symptoms, health problems and coping strategies in 138 terrorism survivors (of whom 80% were physically injured) from a state registry of directly exposed persons, and 171 non-exposed community controls. Structured survey questions measured psychiatric symptoms, posttraumatic growth, general health problems and health care utilization. Open-ended questions explored survivors' most important terrorism-related problems and needs. Quantitative and qualitative data analysis methods were undertaken. Survivors reported similar rates of major health problems and general health care utilization, more anxiety and depression symptoms, and more ancillary health care use than controls on structured assessments. Survivors also reported posttraumatic growth, using several positive coping skills. Open-ended questions identified survivors' specific continuing bombing-related problems, and needs which were not disclosed on the questionnaire; these included many lasting physical injuries, health problems (especially hearing difficulties), specific posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, other emotional symptoms, work and financial problems, interpersonal issues, and desires to help others. Results suggest that extended recovery services are needed long after terrorism exposure, and that open-ended assessment is useful to identify those requiring services.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
This study assesses long-term physical and emotional symptoms and unmet needs in direct survivors of the 1995 Oklahoma City terrorist bombing 18 ½ years after the event.
METHODS METHODS
A telephone questionnaire assessed psychiatric symptoms, health problems and coping strategies in 138 terrorism survivors (of whom 80% were physically injured) from a state registry of directly exposed persons, and 171 non-exposed community controls. Structured survey questions measured psychiatric symptoms, posttraumatic growth, general health problems and health care utilization. Open-ended questions explored survivors' most important terrorism-related problems and needs. Quantitative and qualitative data analysis methods were undertaken.
RESULTS RESULTS
Survivors reported similar rates of major health problems and general health care utilization, more anxiety and depression symptoms, and more ancillary health care use than controls on structured assessments. Survivors also reported posttraumatic growth, using several positive coping skills. Open-ended questions identified survivors' specific continuing bombing-related problems, and needs which were not disclosed on the questionnaire; these included many lasting physical injuries, health problems (especially hearing difficulties), specific posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, other emotional symptoms, work and financial problems, interpersonal issues, and desires to help others.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Results suggest that extended recovery services are needed long after terrorism exposure, and that open-ended assessment is useful to identify those requiring services.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33572729
pii: bs11020019
doi: 10.3390/bs11020019
pmc: PMC7911245
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

PLoS One. 2020 Jun 23;15(6):e0234967
pubmed: 32574198
Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2004 Oct-Dec;16(4):209-15
pubmed: 15702569
Am J Psychiatry. 1999 Jun;156(6):908-11
pubmed: 10360131
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 2017;54(2):9-15
pubmed: 29248901
Psychol Sci. 2019 Apr;30(4):617-628
pubmed: 30865565
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018 Aug;33(4):436-440
pubmed: 30129910
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2013 Feb;48(2):195-203
pubmed: 22717596
J Trauma Stress. 1996 Jul;9(3):455-71
pubmed: 8827649
Compr Psychiatry. 2011 Jan-Feb;52(1):1-8
pubmed: 21220059
Am J Disaster Med. 2019 Winter;14(1):65-70
pubmed: 31441029
J Trauma Stress. 2019 Aug;32(4):526-535
pubmed: 31206211
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Oct 02;11:160
pubmed: 24088369
J Okla State Med Assoc. 1999 Apr;92(4):178-86
pubmed: 10213970
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2004 Apr;19(4):386-90
pubmed: 15065233
J Rehabil Med. 2019 Mar 13;51(3):225-233
pubmed: 30816422
JAMA. 1999 Aug 25;282(8):755-62
pubmed: 10463711
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Apr 1;65(4):559-62
pubmed: 24687109
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2010;23(2):127-37
pubmed: 19582640
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2016 Mar;204(3):203-9
pubmed: 26751732
Stress Health. 2017 Dec;33(5):676-683
pubmed: 28371287

Auteurs

Phebe Tucker (P)

Department of Psychiatry, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.

Betty Pfefferbaum (B)

Department of Psychiatry, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.

Kevin Watson (K)

Department of Psychiatry, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.

Landon Hester (L)

Department of Psychiatry, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.

Christopher Czapla (C)

Department of Psychiatry, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.

Classifications MeSH