Procedural times in early non-intubated VATS program - a propensity score analysis.


Journal

BMC anesthesiology
ISSN: 1471-2253
Titre abrégé: BMC Anesthesiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968535

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 02 2021
Historique:
received: 17 09 2020
accepted: 04 02 2021
entrez: 12 2 2021
pubmed: 13 2 2021
medline: 15 12 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Non-intubated video-assisted thoracic surgery (NiVATS) has been introduced to surgical medicine in order to reduce the invasiveness of anesthetic procedures and avoid adverse effects of intubation and one-lung ventilation (OLV). The aim of this study is to determine the time effectiveness of a NiVATS program compared to conventional OLV. This retrospective analysis included all patients in Leipzig University Hospital that needed minor VATS surgery between November 2016 and October 2019 constituting a NiVATS (n = 67) and an OLV (n = 36) group. Perioperative data was matched via propensity score analysis, identifying two comparable groups with 23 patients. Matched pairs were compared via t-Test. Patients in NiVATS and OLV group show no significant differences other than the type of surgical procedure performed. Wedge resection was performed significantly more often under NiVATS conditions than with OLV (p = 0,043). Recovery time was significantly reduced by 7 min (p = 0,000) in the NiVATS group. There was no significant difference in the time for induction of anesthesia, duration of surgical procedure or overall procedural time. Recovery time was significantly shorter in NiVATS, but this effect disappeared when extrapolated to total procedural time. Even during the implementation phase of NiVATS programs, no extension of procedural times occurs.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Non-intubated video-assisted thoracic surgery (NiVATS) has been introduced to surgical medicine in order to reduce the invasiveness of anesthetic procedures and avoid adverse effects of intubation and one-lung ventilation (OLV). The aim of this study is to determine the time effectiveness of a NiVATS program compared to conventional OLV.
METHODS
This retrospective analysis included all patients in Leipzig University Hospital that needed minor VATS surgery between November 2016 and October 2019 constituting a NiVATS (n = 67) and an OLV (n = 36) group. Perioperative data was matched via propensity score analysis, identifying two comparable groups with 23 patients. Matched pairs were compared via t-Test.
RESULTS
Patients in NiVATS and OLV group show no significant differences other than the type of surgical procedure performed. Wedge resection was performed significantly more often under NiVATS conditions than with OLV (p = 0,043). Recovery time was significantly reduced by 7 min (p = 0,000) in the NiVATS group. There was no significant difference in the time for induction of anesthesia, duration of surgical procedure or overall procedural time.
CONCLUSIONS
Recovery time was significantly shorter in NiVATS, but this effect disappeared when extrapolated to total procedural time. Even during the implementation phase of NiVATS programs, no extension of procedural times occurs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33573604
doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01270-4
pii: 10.1186/s12871-021-01270-4
pmc: PMC7877094
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

44

Références

Lohser J, Slinger P. Lung injury after one-lung ventilation: a review of the pathophysiologic mechanisms affecting the ventilated and the collapsed lung. Anesth Analg. 2015;121(2):302–18.
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000808
Gonzalez-Rivas D, Bonome C, Fieira E, Aymerich H, Fernandez R, Delgado M, et al. Non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic lung resections: the future of thoracic surgery? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;49(3):721–31.
doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv136
Batchelor TJP, Rasburn NJ, Abdelnour-Berchtold E, Brunelli A, Cerfolio RJ, Gonzalez M, et al. Guidelines for enhanced recovery after lung surgery: recommendations of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;55(1):91–115.
doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy301
Knoll H, Ziegeler S, Schreiber J-U, Buchinger H, Bialas P, Semyonov K, et al. Airway injuries after one-lung ventilation: a comparison between double-lumen tube and endobronchial blocker: a randomized, prospective, controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2006;105(3):471–7.
doi: 10.1097/00000542-200609000-00009
Tacconi F, Pompeo E. Non-intubated video-assisted thoracic surgery: where does evidence stand? J Thorac Dis. 2016;8(Suppl 4):364–75. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4856847/pdf/jtd-08-S4-S364.pdf . [cited 2019 Aug 10].
Pompeo E, Mineo TC. Awake pulmonary metastasectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133(4):960–6.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.09.078
Irons JF, Martinez G. Anaesthetic considerations for non-intubated thoracic surgery. J Vis Surg. 2016;2:61 Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5637476/pdf/jovs-02-2016.02.22.pdf . [cited 2019 Aug 10].
Wen Y, Liang H, Qiu G, Liu Z, Liu J, Ying W, et al. Non-intubated spontaneous ventilation in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020;57(3):428–37.
pubmed: 31725158
Lan L, Cen Y, Zhang C, Qiu Y, Ouyang B. A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis for Non-Intubated Thoracic Surgery. Med Sci Monit. 2018;24:8081–7 Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6410560/pdf/medscimonit-24-8081.pdf . [cited 2019 Aug 10].
Liu J, Cui F, Pompeo E, Gonzalez-Rivas D, Chen H, Yin W, et al. The impact of non-intubated versus intubated anaesthesia on early outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical resection in non-small-cell lung cancer: a propensity score matching analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;50(5):920–5.
doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw160
Bernardini A, Natalini G. Risk of pulmonary aspiration with laryngeal mask airway and tracheal tube: analysis on 65 712 procedures with positive pressure ventilation. Anaesthesia. 2009;64(12):1289–94.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06140.x
Kuss O, Blettner M, Börgermann J. Propensity score: an alternative method of analyzing treatment effects. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016;113(35–36):597–603.
pubmed: 27658473 pmcid: 5963493

Auteurs

Isabella Metelmann (I)

Department of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. Isabella.metelmann@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.

Johannes Broschewitz (J)

Department of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School, University Hospital Neuruppin, Fehrbelliner Strasse 38, 16816, Neuruppin, Germany.

Uta-Carolin Pietsch (UC)

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.

Gerald Huschak (G)

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
OR Management, University Hospital of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.

Uwe Eichfeld (U)

Department of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.

Sven Bercker (S)

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.

Sebastian Kraemer (S)

Department of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Leipzig, Liebigstrasse 20, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH