Psychological aspects of climate change risk perception: A content analysis in Iranian context.

climate change psychological aspects risk perception

Journal

Journal of education and health promotion
ISSN: 2277-9531
Titre abrégé: J Educ Health Promot
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101593794

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 24 04 2020
accepted: 30 06 2020
entrez: 12 2 2021
pubmed: 13 2 2021
medline: 13 2 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Risk perception is an important predictor to mitigate climate change effects which can produce mental health consequences such as anxiety and depression. For developing policies of climate risk adaptation, awareness of public attitudes, beliefs, and perception is essential. At this study, researchers tried to focus on the often "unseen" psychological aspects of climate change. A qualitative approach was done with a consistent content analysis method. The study consisted of 33 participants including ordinary people and experts in disasters and climate change. Purposeful sampling was adopted until data saturation. The data collection was performed through in-depth and semi-structured interviews. All interviews were transcribed after listening again and again and reading several times to catch an overall understanding of the interviews. The main theme of the study was "Complexity nature of climate change risk perception" and related categories including "the Mental health dimension," "the Cognitive dimension" and "Interaction of imposed components." The structure of the research community strongly reflected effects of cultural and religious factors in all aspects of community life. Participants' life experiences of extreme events were associated to their perception of climate change. Risk perception is multifactorial and complicate and should clearly be understood to improve community participation to manage climate change-related risks. We propose that authorities and related managers should pay attention to it as a priority. This may assist in developing research on public mental health practices.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Risk perception is an important predictor to mitigate climate change effects which can produce mental health consequences such as anxiety and depression. For developing policies of climate risk adaptation, awareness of public attitudes, beliefs, and perception is essential. At this study, researchers tried to focus on the often "unseen" psychological aspects of climate change.
MATERIALS AND METHODS METHODS
A qualitative approach was done with a consistent content analysis method. The study consisted of 33 participants including ordinary people and experts in disasters and climate change. Purposeful sampling was adopted until data saturation. The data collection was performed through in-depth and semi-structured interviews. All interviews were transcribed after listening again and again and reading several times to catch an overall understanding of the interviews.
RESULTS RESULTS
The main theme of the study was "Complexity nature of climate change risk perception" and related categories including "the Mental health dimension," "the Cognitive dimension" and "Interaction of imposed components." The structure of the research community strongly reflected effects of cultural and religious factors in all aspects of community life. Participants' life experiences of extreme events were associated to their perception of climate change.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Risk perception is multifactorial and complicate and should clearly be understood to improve community participation to manage climate change-related risks. We propose that authorities and related managers should pay attention to it as a priority. This may assist in developing research on public mental health practices.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33575382
doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_415_20
pii: JEHP-9-346
pmc: PMC7871946
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

346

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Education and Health Promotion.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

There are no conflicts of interest.

Références

Aust N Z J Public Health. 2014 Aug;38(4):311-3
pubmed: 25091071
Risk Anal. 2012 Jun;32(6):951-6
pubmed: 22708693
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2018 Jun 1;12:28
pubmed: 29881451
Environ Int. 2004 Aug;30(6):827-40
pubmed: 15120202
Risk Anal. 2005 Dec;25(6):1443-56
pubmed: 16506974

Auteurs

Mehrdad Farrokhi (M)

Health in Emergency and Disaster Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Hamid Reza Khankeh (HR)

Health in Emergency and Disaster Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

Nasir Amanat (N)

Health in Emergency and Disaster Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Mohammad Kamali (M)

Rehabilitation Research Center, Department of Rehabilitation Management, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Mohammad Fathi (M)

Department of Anesthesiology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Classifications MeSH