Activating a Noise-Gating Algorithm and Personalizing Electrode Threshold Levels Improve Recognition of Soft Speech for Adults With CIs.


Journal

Ear and hearing
ISSN: 1538-4667
Titre abrégé: Ear Hear
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8005585

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
pubmed: 13 2 2021
medline: 21 10 2021
entrez: 12 2 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In contrast to the moderate presentation levels most commonly used in clinical practice, speech encountered in everyday life often occurs at low levels, such as when a conversational partner whispers or speaks from another room. In addition, even when the overall signal level is moderate, levels for particular words or speech sounds, such as voiceless consonants, can be considerably lower. Existing techniques for improving recognition of low-level speech for cochlear implant users include using a wider input dynamic range and elevating electrode threshold levels (T-levels). While these techniques tend to positively impact recognition of soft speech, each has also been associated with drawbacks. Recently, a noise-gating (NG) algorithm was reported, which works by eliminating input to an electrode when signal level in the associated frequency channel is at or below a predetermined threshold. Available evidence suggests that activation of this algorithm can improve recognition of sentences presented at low levels (35 to 50 dB SPL), though it remains unclear whether the benefits will be equally evident with both manufacturer default and individually optimized T-levels. The primary aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the independent and combined effects of NG activation and T-level personalization. Twenty adults between the ages of 25 and 77 years (M = 54.9 years, SD = 17.56) with postlingually acquired profound hearing loss completed testing for this study. Participants were fit with an Advanced Bionics Naida CI Q90 speech processor, which contained four programs based on each participant's existing everyday program. The programs varied by the NG algorithm setting (on, off) and T-level method (default 10% of M-level, personalized based on subjective ratings of "very quiet"). All participants completed speech sound detection threshold testing (/m/, /u/, /a/, /i/, /s/, and /∫/), as well as tests of monosyllabic word recognition in quiet (45 and 60 dB SPL), sentence recognition in quiet (45 and 60 dB SPL), and sentence recognition in noise (45-dB SPL speech, +10 dB SNR). Findings demonstrated that both activating NG and personalizing T-levels in isolation significantly improved detection (speech sounds) and recognition (monosyllables, sentences in quiet, and sentences in noise) of soft speech, with their respective individual effects being comparable. However, the lowest speech sound detection thresholds and the highest speech recognition performance were identified when NG was activated in conjunction with personalized T-levels. Importantly, neither T-level personalization nor NG activation affected recognition of speech presented at 60 dB SPL, which suggests the strategies should not be expected to interfere with recognition of average conversational speech. Taken together, these data support the clinical recommendation of personalizing T-levels and activating NG to improve the detection and recognition of soft speech. However, future work is needed to evaluate potential limitations of these techniques. Specifically, speech recognition testing should be performed in the presence of diverse noise backgrounds and home-trials should be conducted to determine processing effects on sound quality in realistic environments.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33577215
doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001003
pii: 00003446-900000000-98548
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1208-1217

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Références

Akhtar N., Jipson J., Callanan M. A. Learning words through overhearing. Child Dev, (2001). 72, 416–430.
Bates D., Machler M., Bolker B. M., Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw, (2015). 67, 1–48.
Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc, (1995). 57, 289–300.
Boderé A., Jaspaert K. Six-year-olds’ learning of novel words through addressed and overheard speech. J Child Lang, (2017). 44, 1163–1191.
Byrne D., Dillon H., Tran K., Arlinger S., Wilbraham K., Cox R, et al. An international comparison of long-term average speech spectra. J Acoust Soc Am, (1994). 96, 2108–2120.
Dawson P. W., Vandali A. E., Knight M. R., Heasman J. M. Clinical evaluation of expanded input dynamic range in nucleus cochlear implants. Ear Hear, (2007). 28, 163–176.
Donaldson G. S., Allen S. L. Effects of presentation level on phoneme and sentence recognition in quiet by cochlear implant listeners. Ear Hear, (2003). 24, 392–405.
Fielder L. D. Dynamic-range requirement for subjectively noise-free reproduction of music. J Audio Engineer Soc, (1982). 30, 504–511.
Firszt J. B., Holden L. K., Skinner M. W., Tobey E. A., Peterson A., Gaggl W., Runge-Samuelson C. L., Wackym P. A. Recognition of speech presented at soft to loud levels by adult cochlear implant recipients of three cochlear implant systems. Ear Hear, (2004). 25, 375–387.
Geißler G., Arweiler I., Hehrmann P., Lenarz T., Hamacher V., Büchner A. Speech reception threshold benefits in cochlear implant users with an adaptive beamformer in real life situations. Cochlear Implants Int, (2015). 16, 69–76.
Hahlbrock K. H. Speech audiometry and new word-tests. Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd, (1953). 162, 394–431.
Holden L. K., Finley C. C., Firszt J. B., Holden T. A., Brenner C., Potts L. G., Gotter B. D., Vanderhoof S. S., Mispagel K., Heydebrand G., Skinner M. W. Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants. Ear Hear, (2013). 34, 342–360.
Holden L. K., Firszt J. B., Reeder R. M., Dwyer N. Y., Stein A. L., Litvak L. M. Evaluation of a new algorithm to optimize audibility in cochlear implant recipients. Ear Hear, (2019). 40, 990–1000.
Holden L. K., Reeder R. M., Firszt J. B., Finley C. C. Optimizing the perception of soft speech and speech in noise with the advanced bionics cochlear implant system. Int J Audiol, (2011). 50, 255–269.
Holden L. K., Skinner M. W., Fourakis M. S., Holden T. A. Effect of increased IIDR in the nucleus freedom cochlear implant system. J Am Acad Audiol, (2007). 18, 777–793.
Lenth R. emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka Least-Squares Means. R package version 1.4. (2019). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans.
Mellon N. K., Ouellette M., Greer T., Gates-Ulanet P. Achieving developmental synchrony in young children with hearing loss. Trends Amplif, (2009). 13, 223–240.
Nunn T. B., Jiang D., Green T., Boyle P. J., Vickers D. A. A systematic review of the impact of adjusting input dynamic range (IDR), electrical threshold (T) level and rate of stimulation on speech perception ability in cochlear implant users. Int J Audiol, (2019). 58, 317–325.
Pearsons K. S., Bennett R., Fidell S. Speech Levels in Various Noise Environments. (1977). US Environmental Protection Agency.
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. (2019). R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Scollie S., Glista D., Tenhaaf J., Dunn A., Malandrino A., Keene K., Folkeard P. Stimuli and normative data for detection of Ling-6 sounds in hearing level. Am J Audiol, (2012). 21, 232–241.
Skinner M. W., Holden L. K., Holden T. A., Demorest M. E. Comparison of two methods for selecting minimum stimulation levels used in programming the Nucleus 22 cochlear implant. J Speech Lang Hear Res, (1999). 42, 814–828.
Skinner M. W., Holden L. K., Holden T. A., Demorest M. E., Fourakis M. S. Speech recognition at simulated soft, conversational, and raised-to-loud vocal efforts by adults with cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am, (1997). 101, 3766–3782.
Spahr A. J., Dorman M. F. Effects of minimum stimulation settings for the Med El Tempo+ speech processor on speech understanding. Ear Hear, (2005). 26(4 Suppl), 2S–6S.
Spahr A. J., Dorman M. F., Loiselle L. H. Performance of patients using different cochlear implant systems: Effects of input dynamic range. Ear Hear, (2007). 28, 260–275.
Studebaker G. A. A “rationalized” arcsine transform. J Speech Hear Res, (1985). 28, 455–462.
Wagener K., Brand T., Kollmeier B. Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests in deutscher Sprache Teil III: Evaluation des Oldenburger Satztests (in German) (Development and evaluation of a German sentence test–Part III: Evaluation of the Oldenburg sentence test). Z Audiol, (1999). 38, 44–56.
Wagener K. C., Vormann M., Latzel M., Mülder H. E. Effect of hearing aid directionality and remote microphone on speech intelligibility in complex listening situations. Trends Hear, (2018). 22, 2331216518804945.
Weissgerber T., Stöver T., Baumann U. Speech perception in noise: Impact of directional microphones in users of combined electric-acoustic stimulation. PLoS One, (2019). 14, e0213251.
Zeng F. G., Grant G., Niparko J., Galvin J., Shannon R., Opie J., Segel P. Speech dynamic range and its effect on cochlear implant performance. J Acoust Soc Am, (2002). 111(1 Pt 1), 377–386.

Auteurs

Steven C Marcrum (SC)

Department of Otolaryngology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Erin M Picou (EM)

Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Christopher Bohr (C)

Department of Otolaryngology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Thomas Steffens (T)

Department of Otolaryngology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH