Passage of abortion ban and women's accurate understanding of abortion legality.


Journal

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
ISSN: 1097-6868
Titre abrégé: Am J Obstet Gynecol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370476

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2021
Historique:
received: 19 11 2020
revised: 02 02 2021
accepted: 07 02 2021
pubmed: 13 2 2021
medline: 23 7 2021
entrez: 12 2 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Legislative and judicial procedures related to banning abortion after 6 weeks of gestation in Ohio occurred from November 2018 to July 2019. These activities could have increased the belief that abortion has become illegal even though the 6-week abortion ban has never been in effect to date. We sought to determine the prevalence and correlates of holding the belief that abortion is illegal in Ohio and to evaluate whether this belief increased over the time in which the 6-week abortion ban was introduced, passed twice, and then blocked in Ohio. We analyzed data from the first wave of the Ohio Survey of Women, a population-based survey of adult, reproductive-aged Ohioan women conducted from October 2018 to June 2019. During each of the 8 survey months, a median of 240 women (range, 70-761) completed the survey, including the survey question "Based on what you know or have heard, is it legal to get an abortion in your state?" We used multivariable logistic regression to assess the prevalence and correlates of believing that abortion is illegal in the state of Ohio. In addition, we used multinomial logistic regression to evaluate whether this belief increased over the interval during which women completed the survey, which roughly corresponded to the interval marked by legislative and judicial activities surrounding the 6-week abortion ban. Most of the 2359 participants understood that abortion is legal in the state of Ohio (64.0%) with the remainder believing it to be illegal (9.8%) or being unsure (26.2%). Correlates of believing abortion to be illegal included younger age, lower socioeconomic status, never married or married status, and Black, non-Hispanic race and ethnicity. Being unsure about legality did not change over time; however, the proportion of women who believed that abortion is illegal increased from the first month (4.5%) to the last month (15.9%) of the study period. Each additional study month was associated with a 17% increase in the odds of believing abortion to be illegal, in both unadjusted and adjusted models (odds ratio, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.27). Attempts to restrict abortion access could contribute to women mistakenly believing that abortion is illegal despite it being unsuccessful.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Legislative and judicial procedures related to banning abortion after 6 weeks of gestation in Ohio occurred from November 2018 to July 2019. These activities could have increased the belief that abortion has become illegal even though the 6-week abortion ban has never been in effect to date.
OBJECTIVE
We sought to determine the prevalence and correlates of holding the belief that abortion is illegal in Ohio and to evaluate whether this belief increased over the time in which the 6-week abortion ban was introduced, passed twice, and then blocked in Ohio.
STUDY DESIGN
We analyzed data from the first wave of the Ohio Survey of Women, a population-based survey of adult, reproductive-aged Ohioan women conducted from October 2018 to June 2019. During each of the 8 survey months, a median of 240 women (range, 70-761) completed the survey, including the survey question "Based on what you know or have heard, is it legal to get an abortion in your state?" We used multivariable logistic regression to assess the prevalence and correlates of believing that abortion is illegal in the state of Ohio. In addition, we used multinomial logistic regression to evaluate whether this belief increased over the interval during which women completed the survey, which roughly corresponded to the interval marked by legislative and judicial activities surrounding the 6-week abortion ban.
RESULTS
Most of the 2359 participants understood that abortion is legal in the state of Ohio (64.0%) with the remainder believing it to be illegal (9.8%) or being unsure (26.2%). Correlates of believing abortion to be illegal included younger age, lower socioeconomic status, never married or married status, and Black, non-Hispanic race and ethnicity. Being unsure about legality did not change over time; however, the proportion of women who believed that abortion is illegal increased from the first month (4.5%) to the last month (15.9%) of the study period. Each additional study month was associated with a 17% increase in the odds of believing abortion to be illegal, in both unadjusted and adjusted models (odds ratio, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.27).
CONCLUSION
Attempts to restrict abortion access could contribute to women mistakenly believing that abortion is illegal despite it being unsuccessful.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33577763
pii: S0002-9378(21)00096-X
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.02.009
pmc: PMC9723984
mid: NIHMS1850276
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

63.e1-63.e8

Subventions

Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : P2C HD058484
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Références

Cult Health Sex. 2015;17(6):733-46
pubmed: 25622191
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Apr;103(4):729-37
pubmed: 15051566
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Feb;119(2 Pt 1):215-9
pubmed: 22270271
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2011 May;22(2):415-21
pubmed: 21551921
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 7;382(19):e47
pubmed: 32272002
BMJ. 2017 Nov 8;359:j5098
pubmed: 29117987
J Immigr Minor Health. 2015 Dec;17(6):1811-8
pubmed: 25488893
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 24;11(3):e0152224
pubmed: 27010629
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jan;125(1):175-183
pubmed: 25560122
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Nov;134(5):1105-1108
pubmed: 31599834
U S Rep U S Supreme Court. 1973;410:113-78
pubmed: 12038376
Fam Community Health. 2011 Apr-Jun;34(2):102-10
pubmed: 21378506
Contraception. 2015 Nov;92(5):422-38
pubmed: 26238336
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Nov;124(5):1060-1065
pubmed: 25437742
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Aug;126(2):258-265
pubmed: 26241413
Am J Public Health. 2016 May;106(5):857-64
pubmed: 26985603
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016 Dec;48(4):189-197
pubmed: 27082099

Auteurs

Maria F Gallo (MF)

Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. Electronic address: gallo.86@osu.edu.

John B Casterline (JB)

Department of Sociology, College of Arts and Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.

Payal Chakraborty (P)

Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.

Alison Norris (A)

Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.

Danielle Bessett (D)

Department of Sociology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.

Abigail Norris Turner (AN)

Division of Infectious Diseases, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH