Neoadjuvant irradiation of retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma with ions (Retro-Ion): study protocol for a randomized phase II pilot trial.
Carbon ion therapy
Heavy ion therapy
Hypofractionation
Irradiation
Proton therapy
Randomized trial
Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma
Journal
Trials
ISSN: 1745-6215
Titre abrégé: Trials
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101263253
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Feb 2021
12 Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
23
05
2020
accepted:
21
01
2021
entrez:
13
2
2021
pubmed:
14
2
2021
medline:
22
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Following surgery for soft tissue sarcoma of the retroperitoneum, the predominant pattern of failure is local recurrence, which remains the main cause of death. Radiotherapy is utilized to reduce recurrence rates but the efficacy of this strategy has not been definitely established. As treatment tolerability is more favorable with preoperative radiotherapy, normofractionated neoadjuvant treatment is the current approach. The final results of the prospective, randomized STRASS (EORTC 62092) trial, which compared the efficacy of this combined treatment to that of surgery alone, are still awaited; preliminary results presented at the 2019 ASCO Annual Meeting indicated that combined treatment is associated with better local control in patients with liposarcoma (74.5% of the cohort, 11% benefit in abdominal progression free survival after 3 years, p = 0.049). Particles allow better sparing of surrounding tissues at risk, e.g., bowel epithelium, and carbon ions additionally offer biologic advantages and are preferred in slow growing tumors. Furthermore, hypofractionation allows for a significantly shorter treatment interval with a lower risk of progression during radiotherapy. We present a prospective, randomized, monocentric phase II trial. Patients with resectable or marginally resectable, histologically confirmed soft tissue sarcoma of the retroperitoneum will be randomized between neoadjuvant proton or neoadjuvant carbon ion radiotherapy in active scanning beam application technique (39 Gy [relative biological effectiveness, RBE] in 13 fractions [5-6 fractions per week] in each arm). The primary objective is the safety and feasibility based on the proportion of grade 3-5 toxicity (CTCAE, version 5.0) in the first 12 months after surgery or discontinuation of treatment for any reason related to the treatment. Local control, local progression-free survival, disease-free survival, overall survival, and quality of life are the secondary endpoints of the study. The aim of this study is to confirm that hypofractionated, accelerated preoperative radiotherapy is safe and feasible. The rationale for the use of particle therapy is the potential for reduced toxicity. The data will lay the groundwork for a randomized phase III trial comparing hypofractionated proton and carbon ion irradiation with regard to local control. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04219202 . Retrospectively registered on January 6, 2020.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Following surgery for soft tissue sarcoma of the retroperitoneum, the predominant pattern of failure is local recurrence, which remains the main cause of death. Radiotherapy is utilized to reduce recurrence rates but the efficacy of this strategy has not been definitely established. As treatment tolerability is more favorable with preoperative radiotherapy, normofractionated neoadjuvant treatment is the current approach. The final results of the prospective, randomized STRASS (EORTC 62092) trial, which compared the efficacy of this combined treatment to that of surgery alone, are still awaited; preliminary results presented at the 2019 ASCO Annual Meeting indicated that combined treatment is associated with better local control in patients with liposarcoma (74.5% of the cohort, 11% benefit in abdominal progression free survival after 3 years, p = 0.049). Particles allow better sparing of surrounding tissues at risk, e.g., bowel epithelium, and carbon ions additionally offer biologic advantages and are preferred in slow growing tumors. Furthermore, hypofractionation allows for a significantly shorter treatment interval with a lower risk of progression during radiotherapy.
METHODS AND DESIGN
METHODS
We present a prospective, randomized, monocentric phase II trial. Patients with resectable or marginally resectable, histologically confirmed soft tissue sarcoma of the retroperitoneum will be randomized between neoadjuvant proton or neoadjuvant carbon ion radiotherapy in active scanning beam application technique (39 Gy [relative biological effectiveness, RBE] in 13 fractions [5-6 fractions per week] in each arm). The primary objective is the safety and feasibility based on the proportion of grade 3-5 toxicity (CTCAE, version 5.0) in the first 12 months after surgery or discontinuation of treatment for any reason related to the treatment. Local control, local progression-free survival, disease-free survival, overall survival, and quality of life are the secondary endpoints of the study.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
The aim of this study is to confirm that hypofractionated, accelerated preoperative radiotherapy is safe and feasible. The rationale for the use of particle therapy is the potential for reduced toxicity. The data will lay the groundwork for a randomized phase III trial comparing hypofractionated proton and carbon ion irradiation with regard to local control.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04219202 . Retrospectively registered on January 6, 2020.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33579340
doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05069-z
pii: 10.1186/s13063-021-05069-z
pmc: PMC7881463
doi:
Substances chimiques
Ions
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04219202']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
134Références
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jan 1;27(1):24-30
pubmed: 19047283
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 Dec;40(12):1641-7
pubmed: 25282099
Ann Surg. 2016 Mar;263(3):593-600
pubmed: 25915910
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jul;17(7):966-975
pubmed: 27210906
Ann Surg. 2015 Jul;262(1):156-62
pubmed: 26061213
Ann Oncol. 2012 Apr;23(4):1067-73
pubmed: 21765179
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Oct;21(10):1366-1377
pubmed: 32941794
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jan 1;27(1):31-7
pubmed: 19047280
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan 04;2(1):85-93
pubmed: 28740917
Cancer. 2006 Apr 1;106(7):1610-6
pubmed: 16518798
Ann Surg. 2003 Sep;238(3):358-70; discussion 370-1
pubmed: 14501502
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2010 Apr;22(3):236-44
pubmed: 20171852
BMC Cancer. 2014 Aug 27;14:617
pubmed: 25163595
Cancer. 1981 May 1;47(9):2147-52
pubmed: 7226108
Am J Clin Oncol. 2018 Dec;41(12):1154-1161
pubmed: 29664796
Cancer J. 2009 Jul-Aug;15(4):325-32
pubmed: 19672150
Ann Surg. 1998 Sep;228(3):355-65
pubmed: 9742918
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Nov 15;75(4):1105-10
pubmed: 19467578
Acta Oncol. 2010 Oct;49(7):1132-40
pubmed: 20831505
Cancer J. 2014 Nov-Dec;20(6):433-9
pubmed: 25415691
Clin Trials. 2008;5(3):225-39
pubmed: 18559412
CA Cancer J Clin. 2005 Jan-Feb;55(1):10-30
pubmed: 15661684
Radiat Oncol. 2018 May 16;13(1):96
pubmed: 29769103
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Aug 1;83(5):1549-57
pubmed: 22270176
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Mar 1;88(3):630-5
pubmed: 24521678
Ann Oncol. 2013 Mar;24(3):832-7
pubmed: 23123508