The interrelationship between confidence and correctness in a multiple-choice assessment: pointing out misconceptions and assuring valuable questions.


Journal

BDJ open
ISSN: 2056-807X
Titre abrégé: BDJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101709456

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Feb 2021
Historique:
received: 13 11 2020
accepted: 22 01 2021
revised: 11 01 2021
entrez: 13 2 2021
pubmed: 14 2 2021
medline: 14 2 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The aim of this study was to better understand the interfaces of being correct or incorrect and confident or unconfident; aiming to point out misconceptions and assure valuable questions. This cross-sectional study was conducted using a convenience sample of second-year dental students (n = 29) attending a preclinical endodontics course. Students answered 20 multiple-choice questions ("basic" or "moderate" level) on endodontics, all of which were followed by one confidence question (scale). Our two research questions were: (1) How was the students' performance, considering correctness, misconceptions, and level of confidence? (2) Were the questions valuable, appropriate and friendly, and which ones led to misconceptions? Four situations arouse from the interrelationship between question correctness and confidence level: (1st) correct and confident, (2nd) correct and unconfident, (3rd) incorrect and confident (misconception) and (4th) incorrect and unconfident. Statistical analysis (α = 5%) considered the interaction between (a) students' performance with misconceptions and confidence; (b) question's difficulty with correctness and confidence; and (c) misconceptions with clinical and negative questions. Students had 92.5% of correctness and 84.6% of confidence level. Nine students were responsible for the 12 misconceptions. Students who had more misconceptions had lower correctness (P < 0.001). High achieving students had low confidence in their incorrect responses (P = 0.047). 'Moderate' questions had more incorrectness (P < 0.05) and less confidence (P = 0.02) than 'basic'. All questions were considered valuable [for example, the ones that presented images or required a mental picture of a clinical scenario, since they induced less misconception (P = 0.007)]. There was no difference in misconceptions between negative questions and other questions (P = 0.96). Preclinical endodontic students were highly correct and very confident in their responses. Students who had more misconceptions had also the lowest performance in the assessment. Questions were valuable; but some will worth further improvement for the future. A multiple-choice assessment, when combined with confidence questions, provided helpful information regarding misconceptions and questions value.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33579896
doi: 10.1038/s41405-021-00067-4
pii: 10.1038/s41405-021-00067-4
pmc: PMC7881024
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

10

Références

J Dent Educ. 2015 Aug;79(8):928-33
pubmed: 26246531
J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Feb;13(1):138-45
pubmed: 17286736
Med Educ Online. 2020 Dec;25(1):1714199
pubmed: 31931687
Eur J Dent Educ. 2018 Feb;22(1):e101-e106
pubmed: 28244629
Contemp Educ Psychol. 2000 Jan;25(1):82-91
pubmed: 10620383
J Dent Educ. 2020 Mar;84(3):316-322
pubmed: 32176343
J Dent Educ. 2017 Aug;81(8):948-955
pubmed: 28765439
J Dent Educ. 2015 Jan;79(1):16-24
pubmed: 25576548
Med Educ. 2013 Jun;47(6):578-84
pubmed: 23662875
Med Teach. 2013;35(2):127-33
pubmed: 23126243
J Paediatr Child Health. 2011 Jun;47(6):322-5
pubmed: 21615597
J Dent Educ. 2014 Dec;78(12):1643-54
pubmed: 25480280
Eur J Dent Educ. 2018 Aug;22(3):e400-e407
pubmed: 29266593
Eur J Dent Educ. 2019 May;23(2):159-167
pubmed: 30585682
J Chiropr Educ. 2013 Spring;27(1):21-6
pubmed: 23519005
Mem Cognit. 2008 Apr;36(3):604-16
pubmed: 18491500
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013 Mar-Apr;28(2):327-8
pubmed: 23527334
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Nov;91(6):1208-24
pubmed: 17100479
J Dent Educ. 2012 Sep;76(9):1183-94
pubmed: 22942414
BMJ Open. 2017 May 9;7(5):e012289
pubmed: 28487454

Auteurs

Renata Grazziotin-Soares (R)

USASK-University of Saskatchewan, College of Dentistry, Saskatoon, SK, Canada. regrazziotin@gmail.com.

Coca Blue (C)

USASK-University of Saskatchewan, College of Dentistry, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.

Rachel Feraro (R)

USASK-University of Saskatchewan, College of Dentistry, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.

Kristen Tochor (K)

USASK-University of Saskatchewan, College of Dentistry, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.

Thiago Machado Ardenghi (TM)

Department of Stomatology, UFSM-Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil.

Donald Curtis (D)

Department of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, UCSF-School of Dentistry, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Diego Machado Ardenghi (DM)

USASK-University of Saskatchewan, College of Dentistry, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.

Classifications MeSH