Automated seizure diagnosis system based on feature extraction and channel selection using EEG signals.
And seizure classification
Channel selection
Cross-validation
Electroencephalography (EEG)
Epilepsy
Feature extraction
Seizure
Journal
Brain informatics
ISSN: 2198-4018
Titre abrégé: Brain Inform
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101673751
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Feb 2021
12 Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
07
05
2020
accepted:
10
01
2021
entrez:
13
2
2021
pubmed:
14
2
2021
medline:
14
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Seizure is an abnormal electrical activity of the brain. Neurologists can diagnose the seizure using several methods such as neurological examination, blood tests, computerized tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and electroencephalogram (EEG). Medical data, such as the EEG signal, usually includes a number of features and attributes that do not contains important information. This paper proposes an automatic seizure classification system based on extracting the most significant EEG features for seizure diagnosis. The proposed algorithm consists of five steps. The first step is the channel selection to minimize dimensionality by selecting the most affected channels using the variance parameter. The second step is the feature extraction to extract the most relevant features, 11 features, from the selected channels. The third step is to average the 11 features extracted from each channel. Next, the fourth step is the classification of the average features using the classification step. Finally, cross-validation and testing the proposed algorithm by dividing the dataset into training and testing sets. This paper presents a comparative study of seven classifiers. These classifiers were tested using two different methods: random case testing and continuous case testing. In the random case process, the KNN classifier had greater precision, specificity, positive predictability than the other classifiers. Still, the ensemble classifier had a higher sensitivity and a lower miss-rate (2.3%) than the other classifiers. For the continuous case test method, the ensemble classifier had higher metric parameters than the other classifiers. In addition, the ensemble classifier was able to detect all seizure cases without any mistake.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33580323
doi: 10.1186/s40708-021-00123-7
pii: 10.1186/s40708-021-00123-7
pmc: PMC7881082
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1Subventions
Organisme : University of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
ID : UJ-04-18-ICP
Références
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2016 Aug;2016:1018-1021
pubmed: 28268497
Circulation. 2000 Jun 13;101(23):E215-20
pubmed: 10851218
Brain Inform. 2020 May 25;7(1):5
pubmed: 32451639
Cogn Neurodyn. 2019 Apr;13(2):175-181
pubmed: 30956721
Comput Biol Med. 2017 Mar 1;82:49-58
pubmed: 28161592
Brain Inform. 2016 Jun;3(2):119-131
pubmed: 27747607
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2010 Mar;32(3):569-75
pubmed: 20075479
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2012 Dec;108(3):1206-15
pubmed: 22884166
Pediatr Neurol. 2005 Mar;32(3):155-61
pubmed: 15730894
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2016 Jan;24(1):28-35
pubmed: 26068546
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Data Min Knowl Discov. 2019 Jul-Aug;9(4):e1312
pubmed: 32089788
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2015 Oct;53(10):929-42
pubmed: 25980503
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2005 May;78(2):87-99
pubmed: 15848265
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2019 Jan;23(1):83-94
pubmed: 30624207
Clin Neurophysiol. 2012 Jan;123(1):84-92
pubmed: 21752709
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2012 Jul;50(7):659-69
pubmed: 22476713