The public health implications of the Paris Agreement: a modelling study.


Journal

The Lancet. Planetary health
ISSN: 2542-5196
Titre abrégé: Lancet Planet Health
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101704339

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2021
Historique:
received: 12 06 2020
revised: 10 09 2020
accepted: 28 09 2020
pubmed: 14 2 2021
medline: 22 6 2021
entrez: 13 2 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

nationally determined contributions (NDCs) serve to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement of staying "well below 2°C", which could also yield substantial health co-benefits in the process. However, existing NDC commitments are inadequate to achieve this goal. Placing health as a key focus of the NDCs could present an opportunity to increase ambition and realise health co-benefits. We modelled scenarios to analyse the health co-benefits of NDCs for the year 2040 for nine representative countries (ie, Brazil, China, Germany, India, Indonesia, Nigeria, South Africa, the UK, and the USA) that were selected for their contribution to global greenhouse gas emissions and their global or regional influence. Modelling the energy, food and agriculture, and transport sectors, and mortality related to risk factors of air pollution, diet, and physical activity, we analysed the health co-benefits of existing NDCs and related policies (ie, the current pathways scenario) for 2040 in nine countries around the world. We compared these health co-benefits with two alternative scenarios, one consistent with the goal of the Paris Agreement and the Sustainable Development Goals (ie, the sustainable pathways scenario), and one in line with the sustainable pathways scenario, but also placing health as a central focus of the policies (ie, the health in all climate policies scenario). Compared with the current pathways scenario, the sustainable pathways scenario resulted in an annual reduction of 1·18 million air pollution-related deaths, 5·86 million diet-related deaths, and 1·15 million deaths due to physical inactivity, across the nine countries, by 2040. Adopting the more ambitious health in all climate policies scenario would result in a further reduction of 462 000 annual deaths attributable to air pollution, 572 000 annual deaths attributable to diet, and 943 000 annual deaths attributable to physical inactivity. These benefits were attributable to the mitigation of direct greenhouse gas emissions and the commensurate actions that reduce exposure to harmful pollutants, as well as improved diets and safe physical activity. A greater consideration of health in the NDCs and climate change mitigation policies has the potential to yield considerable health benefits as well as achieve the "well below 2°C" commitment across a range of regional and economic contexts. This work was in part funded through an unrestricted grant from the Wellcome Trust (award number 209734/Z/17/Z) and supported by an Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council grant (grant number EP/R035288/1).

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
nationally determined contributions (NDCs) serve to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement of staying "well below 2°C", which could also yield substantial health co-benefits in the process. However, existing NDC commitments are inadequate to achieve this goal. Placing health as a key focus of the NDCs could present an opportunity to increase ambition and realise health co-benefits. We modelled scenarios to analyse the health co-benefits of NDCs for the year 2040 for nine representative countries (ie, Brazil, China, Germany, India, Indonesia, Nigeria, South Africa, the UK, and the USA) that were selected for their contribution to global greenhouse gas emissions and their global or regional influence.
METHODS
Modelling the energy, food and agriculture, and transport sectors, and mortality related to risk factors of air pollution, diet, and physical activity, we analysed the health co-benefits of existing NDCs and related policies (ie, the current pathways scenario) for 2040 in nine countries around the world. We compared these health co-benefits with two alternative scenarios, one consistent with the goal of the Paris Agreement and the Sustainable Development Goals (ie, the sustainable pathways scenario), and one in line with the sustainable pathways scenario, but also placing health as a central focus of the policies (ie, the health in all climate policies scenario).
FINDINGS
Compared with the current pathways scenario, the sustainable pathways scenario resulted in an annual reduction of 1·18 million air pollution-related deaths, 5·86 million diet-related deaths, and 1·15 million deaths due to physical inactivity, across the nine countries, by 2040. Adopting the more ambitious health in all climate policies scenario would result in a further reduction of 462 000 annual deaths attributable to air pollution, 572 000 annual deaths attributable to diet, and 943 000 annual deaths attributable to physical inactivity. These benefits were attributable to the mitigation of direct greenhouse gas emissions and the commensurate actions that reduce exposure to harmful pollutants, as well as improved diets and safe physical activity.
INTERPRETATION
A greater consideration of health in the NDCs and climate change mitigation policies has the potential to yield considerable health benefits as well as achieve the "well below 2°C" commitment across a range of regional and economic contexts.
FUNDING
This work was in part funded through an unrestricted grant from the Wellcome Trust (award number 209734/Z/17/Z) and supported by an Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council grant (grant number EP/R035288/1).

Identifiants

pubmed: 33581069
pii: S2542-5196(20)30249-7
doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30249-7
pmc: PMC7887663
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Air Pollutants 0
Greenhouse Gases 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e74-e83

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/K023187/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 209387/Z/17/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 205212/Z/16/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 209734/Z/17/Z
Pays : United Kingdom

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : ErratumIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Références

Lancet. 2009 Dec 12;374(9706):2006-15
pubmed: 19942282
Lancet. 2009 Dec 5;374(9705):1917-29
pubmed: 19942273
Lancet. 2009 Dec 19;374(9707):2091-2103
pubmed: 19942276
Lancet. 2017 Mar 18;389(10074):1151-1164
pubmed: 27856085
Science. 2001 Aug 17;293(5533):1257-9
pubmed: 11509711
Lancet Planet Health. 2018 Oct;2(10):e451-e461
pubmed: 30318102
PLoS Med. 2018 Jul 31;15(7):e1002622
pubmed: 30063716
Prev Med. 2016 Jun;87:233-236
pubmed: 27156248
Prev Chronic Dis. 2020 Jul 09;17:E59
pubmed: 32644919
Lancet. 2009 Dec 12;374(9706):2016-25
pubmed: 19942280
Nature. 2018 Oct;562(7728):519-525
pubmed: 30305731
Lancet. 2018 Feb 3;391(10119):462-512
pubmed: 29056410
Lancet Planet Health. 2018 Mar;2(3):e126-e133
pubmed: 29615227
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Jun 15;627:388-402
pubmed: 29426161
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2020 Oct 30;378(2183):20190331
pubmed: 32981437
Lancet. 2009 Dec 5;374(9705):1930-43
pubmed: 19942277
BMJ. 2020 Mar 30;368:l6758
pubmed: 32229476
Lancet. 2015 Nov 7;386(10006):1861-914
pubmed: 26111439

Auteurs

Ian Hamilton (I)

UCL Energy Institute, University College London, London, UK. Electronic address: i.hamilton@ucl.ac.uk.

Harry Kennard (H)

UCL Energy Institute, University College London, London, UK.

Alice McGushin (A)

Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.

Lena Höglund-Isaksson (L)

Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Programme, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.

Gregor Kiesewetter (G)

Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Programme, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.

Melissa Lott (M)

Center on Global Energy Policy, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

James Milner (J)

Centre on Climate Change and Planetary Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Department of Public Health, Environments and Society, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Pallav Purohit (P)

Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Programme, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.

Peter Rafaj (P)

Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases Programme, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.

Rohit Sharma (R)

Centre for Diet and Activity Research, MRC Epidemiology Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Marco Springmann (M)

Oxford Martin Programme on the Future of Food, Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Centre on Population Approaches for Non-Communicable Disease Prevention, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

James Woodcock (J)

Centre for Diet and Activity Research, MRC Epidemiology Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Nick Watts (N)

Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH