Quality of Life After Bladder Cancer: A Cross-sectional Survey of Patient-reported Outcomes.
Bacillus Calmette-Guerin
Bladder cancer
EQ-5D
Health-related quality of life
Patient-reported outcomes
Quality of life
Radical cystectomy
Journal
European urology
ISSN: 1873-7560
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 7512719
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2021
05 2021
Historique:
received:
07
10
2020
accepted:
25
01
2021
pubmed:
15
2
2021
medline:
10
2
2022
entrez:
14
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Little is known about health-related quality of life (HRQOL) following treatment for bladder cancer (BC). To determine this, we undertook a cross-sectional survey covering 10% of the English population. Participants 1-10 yr from diagnosis were identified through national cancer registration data. A postal survey was administered containing generic HRQOL and BC-specific outcome measures. Findings were compared with those of the general population and other pelvic cancer patients. Generic HRQOL was measured using five-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30. BC-specific outcomes were derived from EORTC QLQ-BLM30 and EORTC QLQ-NMIBC24. A total of 1796 surveys were completed (response rate 55%), including 868 (48%) patients with non-muscle-invasive BC, 893 (50%) patients who received radiotherapy or radical cystectomy, and 35 (1.9%) patients for whom treatment was unknown. Most (69%) of the participants reported at least one problem in any EQ-5D dimension. Age/sex-adjusted generic HRQOL outcomes were similar across all stages and treatment groups, whilst problems increased with age (problems in one or more EQ-5D dimensions: <65 yr [67% {95% confidence interval or CI: 61-74}] vs 85+ yr [84% {95% CI: 81-89}], p = 0.016) and long-term conditions (no conditions [53% {95% CI: 48-58}] vs more than four conditions [94% {95% CI: 90-97}], p < 0.001). Sexual problems were reported commonly in men, increasing with younger age and radical treatment. Younger participants (under 65 yr) reported more financial difficulties (mean score 20 [95% CI: 16-25]) than those aged 85+ yr (6.8 [4.5-9.2], p < 0.001). HRQOL for BC patients (for comparison, males with problems in one or more EQ-5D dimensions 69% [95% CI: 66-72]) was significantly worse than what has been found after colorectal and prostate cancers and in the general population (51% [95% CI: 48-53], all p < 0.05). HRQOL following BC appears to be relatively independent of disease stage, treatment, and multimodal care. Issues are reported with sexual function and financial toxicity. HRQOL after BC is worse than that after other pelvic cancers. Patients living with bladder cancer often have reduced quality of life, which may be worse than that for other common pelvic cancer patients. Age and other illnesses appear to be more important in determining this quality of life than the treatments received. Many men complain of sexual problems. Younger patients have financial worries.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Little is known about health-related quality of life (HRQOL) following treatment for bladder cancer (BC).
OBJECTIVE
To determine this, we undertook a cross-sectional survey covering 10% of the English population.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
Participants 1-10 yr from diagnosis were identified through national cancer registration data.
INTERVENTION
A postal survey was administered containing generic HRQOL and BC-specific outcome measures. Findings were compared with those of the general population and other pelvic cancer patients.
OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Generic HRQOL was measured using five-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30. BC-specific outcomes were derived from EORTC QLQ-BLM30 and EORTC QLQ-NMIBC24.
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS
A total of 1796 surveys were completed (response rate 55%), including 868 (48%) patients with non-muscle-invasive BC, 893 (50%) patients who received radiotherapy or radical cystectomy, and 35 (1.9%) patients for whom treatment was unknown. Most (69%) of the participants reported at least one problem in any EQ-5D dimension. Age/sex-adjusted generic HRQOL outcomes were similar across all stages and treatment groups, whilst problems increased with age (problems in one or more EQ-5D dimensions: <65 yr [67% {95% confidence interval or CI: 61-74}] vs 85+ yr [84% {95% CI: 81-89}], p = 0.016) and long-term conditions (no conditions [53% {95% CI: 48-58}] vs more than four conditions [94% {95% CI: 90-97}], p < 0.001). Sexual problems were reported commonly in men, increasing with younger age and radical treatment. Younger participants (under 65 yr) reported more financial difficulties (mean score 20 [95% CI: 16-25]) than those aged 85+ yr (6.8 [4.5-9.2], p < 0.001). HRQOL for BC patients (for comparison, males with problems in one or more EQ-5D dimensions 69% [95% CI: 66-72]) was significantly worse than what has been found after colorectal and prostate cancers and in the general population (51% [95% CI: 48-53], all p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
HRQOL following BC appears to be relatively independent of disease stage, treatment, and multimodal care. Issues are reported with sexual function and financial toxicity. HRQOL after BC is worse than that after other pelvic cancers.
PATIENT SUMMARY
Patients living with bladder cancer often have reduced quality of life, which may be worse than that for other common pelvic cancer patients. Age and other illnesses appear to be more important in determining this quality of life than the treatments received. Many men complain of sexual problems. Younger patients have financial worries.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33581875
pii: S0302-2838(21)00073-7
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.01.032
pmc: PMC8082273
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
621-632Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Références
Eur Urol. 2019 Nov;76(5):639-657
pubmed: 31443960
Br J Cancer. 2013 Apr 16;108(7):1534-40
pubmed: 23481180
Cancer. 2018 Aug 1;124(15):3136-3144
pubmed: 29727033
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Mar;20(3):436-447
pubmed: 30713036
Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36
pubmed: 21479777
Eur Urol. 2015 Mar;67(3):357-8
pubmed: 25454610
J Health Commun. 2016;21(sup2):99-104
pubmed: 27661137
Qual Life Res. 1996 Dec;5(6):555-67
pubmed: 8993101
BJU Int. 2002 Sep;90(4):386-90
pubmed: 12175394
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Feb 20;33(6):616-24
pubmed: 25559806
Urol Oncol. 2019 Jul 16;:
pubmed: 31324457
Health Policy. 1990 Dec;16(3):199-208
pubmed: 10109801
Cancer. 2006 Jun 1;106(11):2355-62
pubmed: 16649218
J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 20;30(15):1871-8
pubmed: 22529264
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 17;9(6):e030850
pubmed: 31213456
BMC Cancer. 2020 May 20;20(1):455
pubmed: 32434491
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 21;15(10):e0239338
pubmed: 33085669
Cancer. 1996 Sep 1;78(5):1089-97
pubmed: 8780548
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Dec;1(9):1282-90
pubmed: 26448641
Health Econ. 2018 Jan;27(1):7-22
pubmed: 28833869
J Cancer Surviv. 2017 Aug;11(4):453-461
pubmed: 28213769
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Jan 20;39(3):202-214
pubmed: 33332191
Eur Urol. 2007 Aug;52(2):510-5
pubmed: 17306446
Urology. 2010 Sep;76(3):671-5
pubmed: 20451964
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76
pubmed: 8433390
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Jan 31;20:100269
pubmed: 32300733
Int J Urol. 2003 Aug;10(8):423-9
pubmed: 12887363
Br J Cancer. 2018 May;118(11):1518-1528
pubmed: 29755116
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun 1;34(16):1945-52
pubmed: 27001593
Eur Urol. 2020 Feb;77(2):223-250
pubmed: 31753752
Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Sep;4(5):725-730
pubmed: 28753772
Bladder Cancer. 2016 Apr 27;2(2):139-149
pubmed: 27376136
Eur Urol. 2018 Oct;74(4):531-534
pubmed: 29793815
J Immunother Cancer. 2017 Aug 15;5(1):68
pubmed: 28807024
Eur Urol. 2014 Dec;66(6):1148-56
pubmed: 24612661
Eur Urol. 2018 Dec;74(6):784-795
pubmed: 30268659
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2015;24(1):85-98
pubmed: 25327713
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Mar;41(3):295-9
pubmed: 24913090
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2015;:e616-20
pubmed: 25993231
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jul 10;35(20):2299-2305
pubmed: 28410011
Urology. 2015 Nov;86(5):974-9
pubmed: 26291562