Long-Term Outcomes of Cervical Cancer Patients Treated With Definitive Chemoradiation Following a Complete Metabolic Response.
Cervical cancer
FDG-PET
chemoradiation
complete metabolic response
prognosis
recurrence
Journal
Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))
ISSN: 1433-2981
Titre abrégé: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9002902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2021
05 2021
Historique:
received:
10
10
2020
revised:
11
01
2021
accepted:
20
01
2021
pubmed:
15
2
2021
medline:
26
11
2021
entrez:
14
2
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A complete metabolic response (CMR) on early post-treatment Patients who received curative-intent chemoradiation from 1998 to 2018 for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB1-IVA cervical cancer and had a CMR on post-treatment FDG-PET within 5 months of treatment completion were included. Cox proportional hazards models determined factors associated with locoregional and distant failure. Kaplan-Meier estimates of freedom from any recurrence (FFR) of patient subgroups were compared with Log-rank tests. There were 402 patients with a CMR after chemoradiation on FDG-PET. Initial T stage was T1 (38%)/T2 (40%)/T3 (20%)/T4 (2%); initial FDG-avid nodal status was no nodes (50%)/pelvic lymph nodes (40%)/pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes (10%). After a median follow-up of 6 years, 109 (27%) recurred. The pattern of recurrence was locoregional (27%), distant (61%) or both (12%). No factors were associated with locoregional failure. Distant recurrence was more likely in patients with T3-4 lesions (hazard ratio = 2.4, 95% confidence interval 1.5-3.8) and involvement of pelvic (hazard ratio = 1.6, 95% confidence interval 1.0-2.7) or para-aortic lymph nodes (hazard ratio = 2.7, 95% confidence interval 1.4-5.0) at diagnosis. The 5-year FFR rates for T1-2 patients with no nodes, pelvic nodes alone or para-aortic nodes at diagnosis were 85, 76 and 62%, respectively (P = 0.04, none versus para-aortic nodes). The 5-year FFR for T3-4 patients with no nodes, pelvic nodes alone or para-aortic nodes at diagnosis were 68, 56 and 25%, respectively (P = 0.09, none versus para-aortic nodes). T3-4 tumours and para-aortic nodal involvement at diagnosis are poor prognostic factors, even after a CMR following chemoradiation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33581976
pii: S0936-6555(21)00010-8
doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.01.010
pmc: PMC8453338
mid: NIHMS1736851
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
0Z5B2CJX4D
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02635360']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
300-306Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : K08 CA237822
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA136931
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA181745
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R21 CA223799
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Références
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Jan 01;6(1):92-99
pubmed: 31774464
Anticancer Res. 2020 Jan;40(1):451-458
pubmed: 31892600
J Clin Oncol. 2011 May 1;29(13):1678-85
pubmed: 21444871
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Nov;155(2):224-228
pubmed: 31500891
Nat Cancer. 2020 Feb;1(2):176-183
pubmed: 34505064
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Jan;46(1):341-350
pubmed: 32638077
JCO Precis Oncol. 2018 Nov;2:1-8
pubmed: 35135145
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Nov 15;90(4):794-801
pubmed: 25245584
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 Nov;29(9):1351-1354
pubmed: 31473660
Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Jan;112(1):104-9
pubmed: 18929403
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 1;38(25):2830-2838
pubmed: 32484754
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Jan;17(1):91-97
pubmed: 30659133
Cancer. 2020 Sep 15;126(18):4168-4176
pubmed: 32639597
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Feb;37(2):431-4
pubmed: 23023940
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Apr 1;103(5):1088-1097
pubmed: 30445171
J Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Jul;30(4):e82
pubmed: 31074236
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Oct 1;102(2):362-372
pubmed: 29920324
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 10;13(10):e0204334
pubmed: 30303986
Semin Nucl Med. 2019 Nov;49(6):493-500
pubmed: 31630733
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Nov;127(2):303-6
pubmed: 22902917
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014 Jul;41(7):1336-42
pubmed: 24562649
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 May 1;83(1):185-90
pubmed: 22014958
Br J Cancer. 2018 Jan;118(1):72-78
pubmed: 29112685
J Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Sep;30(5):e66
pubmed: 31328452
JAMA. 2007 Nov 21;298(19):2289-95
pubmed: 18029833