Long-Term Outcomes of Cervical Cancer Patients Treated With Definitive Chemoradiation Following a Complete Metabolic Response.


Journal

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))
ISSN: 1433-2981
Titre abrégé: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9002902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2021
Historique:
received: 10 10 2020
revised: 11 01 2021
accepted: 20 01 2021
pubmed: 15 2 2021
medline: 26 11 2021
entrez: 14 2 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

A complete metabolic response (CMR) on early post-treatment Patients who received curative-intent chemoradiation from 1998 to 2018 for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB1-IVA cervical cancer and had a CMR on post-treatment FDG-PET within 5 months of treatment completion were included. Cox proportional hazards models determined factors associated with locoregional and distant failure. Kaplan-Meier estimates of freedom from any recurrence (FFR) of patient subgroups were compared with Log-rank tests. There were 402 patients with a CMR after chemoradiation on FDG-PET. Initial T stage was T1 (38%)/T2 (40%)/T3 (20%)/T4 (2%); initial FDG-avid nodal status was no nodes (50%)/pelvic lymph nodes (40%)/pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes (10%). After a median follow-up of 6 years, 109 (27%) recurred. The pattern of recurrence was locoregional (27%), distant (61%) or both (12%). No factors were associated with locoregional failure. Distant recurrence was more likely in patients with T3-4 lesions (hazard ratio = 2.4, 95% confidence interval 1.5-3.8) and involvement of pelvic (hazard ratio = 1.6, 95% confidence interval 1.0-2.7) or para-aortic lymph nodes (hazard ratio = 2.7, 95% confidence interval 1.4-5.0) at diagnosis. The 5-year FFR rates for T1-2 patients with no nodes, pelvic nodes alone or para-aortic nodes at diagnosis were 85, 76 and 62%, respectively (P = 0.04, none versus para-aortic nodes). The 5-year FFR for T3-4 patients with no nodes, pelvic nodes alone or para-aortic nodes at diagnosis were 68, 56 and 25%, respectively (P = 0.09, none versus para-aortic nodes). T3-4 tumours and para-aortic nodal involvement at diagnosis are poor prognostic factors, even after a CMR following chemoradiation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33581976
pii: S0936-6555(21)00010-8
doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.01.010
pmc: PMC8453338
mid: NIHMS1736851
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 0Z5B2CJX4D

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02635360']

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

300-306

Subventions

Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : K08 CA237822
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA136931
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA181745
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R21 CA223799
Pays : United States

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Références

JAMA Oncol. 2020 Jan 01;6(1):92-99
pubmed: 31774464
Anticancer Res. 2020 Jan;40(1):451-458
pubmed: 31892600
J Clin Oncol. 2011 May 1;29(13):1678-85
pubmed: 21444871
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Nov;155(2):224-228
pubmed: 31500891
Nat Cancer. 2020 Feb;1(2):176-183
pubmed: 34505064
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Jan;46(1):341-350
pubmed: 32638077
JCO Precis Oncol. 2018 Nov;2:1-8
pubmed: 35135145
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Nov 15;90(4):794-801
pubmed: 25245584
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 Nov;29(9):1351-1354
pubmed: 31473660
Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Jan;112(1):104-9
pubmed: 18929403
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 1;38(25):2830-2838
pubmed: 32484754
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Jan;17(1):91-97
pubmed: 30659133
Cancer. 2020 Sep 15;126(18):4168-4176
pubmed: 32639597
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Feb;37(2):431-4
pubmed: 23023940
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Apr 1;103(5):1088-1097
pubmed: 30445171
J Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Jul;30(4):e82
pubmed: 31074236
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Oct 1;102(2):362-372
pubmed: 29920324
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 10;13(10):e0204334
pubmed: 30303986
Semin Nucl Med. 2019 Nov;49(6):493-500
pubmed: 31630733
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Nov;127(2):303-6
pubmed: 22902917
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014 Jul;41(7):1336-42
pubmed: 24562649
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 May 1;83(1):185-90
pubmed: 22014958
Br J Cancer. 2018 Jan;118(1):72-78
pubmed: 29112685
J Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Sep;30(5):e66
pubmed: 31328452
JAMA. 2007 Nov 21;298(19):2289-95
pubmed: 18029833

Auteurs

A J Lin (AJ)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. Electronic address: alexanderlin@wustl.edu.

F Dehdashti (F)

Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Division of Nuclear Medicine, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

L S Massad (LS)

Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Division of Gynecology Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

P H Thaker (PH)

Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Division of Gynecology Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

M A Powell (MA)

Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Division of Gynecology Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

D G Mutch (DG)

Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Division of Gynecology Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

J K Schwarz (JK)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

S Markovina (S)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

B A Siegel (BA)

Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Division of Nuclear Medicine, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

P W Grigsby (PW)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; Division of Nuclear Medicine, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH